First, there are many points at the website that are not listed in the OP. There are several short videos, as well.

Quote from: Hispo on July 29, 2024, 10:21:56 PM

I have got some question about this alledged list on the political characteristics on Kamala Harris, who is seeking for the presidency. For example, it mentions she is a election denier, who come she is one? I don't remember a single instance in which she denied the outcome of an election. are we talking about back then when Trump got elected in 2016 or something? - I have the same question. People talk. This might have simply been some talk that slipped out. Or the guy might want to make her look bad in a lot more ways than are truthful.

Also, what is wrong with a country having access to high quality and universal healthcare? Most of the countries in Europe do and even Japan, who happen to have very high standards of living. In general people are happier when they can count on having access to healthcare. - There is nothing wrong with the idea of good, universal healthcare. The points against what is going on are several:
1. What looks like good healthcare is not. Many hospital practices leave people in a downward spiral, so that once they leave the hospital, they are bound to go back, or are hooked on drugs that ovr the long term wreck their health.
2. Healthcare is the same thing that created Covid, and then created a vaccine for it that might be 5 times worse than Covid itself.
3. Who is paying for universal healthcare? Loads of people never need it, don't want it, and would never use it if they had their freedom from it. Why should they pay for it? Let the people who use it pay for it. And if somebody says that it is too expensive, it's the same as any other 'product'. Supply and demand. Can't afford it? Don't use it, and the price will come down. In other words, it is universal healthcare itself that is bolstering the high price of healthcare. Besides, nutritional and alternative medicine are better.
4. Universal healthcare needs directors to direct it. These directors are often free to dip their hand into the funds that have been appropriated for the healthcare, and to walk off with these funds. Universal healthcare is open to fraud in the stealing of funds. Knowing about human nature, it's happening all over the place.

Also, what is the meaning of "supporting open borders"? I have a friend who explained to me that he personally wanted borders to be open in the sense that anyone can enter and exit The USA without paperwork, I tried to explain to him that would be impractical and could translated onto increasing human trafficking and drug smuggling.
It seems to me different people have different understandings of the concept.

Open borders is a big point. There is much that can be said both ways.

Remember Ellis Island. People were welcome in the past to come into the USA.

This changed... especially since the formation of the Federal Reserve Bank. It has taken 100 years to convert America from a free country into one run by the banking system. This is evident from the fact that people think that Democracy is the best form of government. But America was formed as a Constitutional Republic. It took 100 years of bank control to propagandize the people into faulty thinking about open borders, and about Democracy.

If borders had remained open all along, the Constitutional Republic that would have been required for this openness, would have gradually spread to other countries. Possibly the whole world would become free rather than under the control of the bankers as it is now.

Cool