Quote from: OgNasty on Today at 03:00:07 PM

I am not in favor of mixers, predicted their demise here, and laughed at the clowns who were defending them for a paycheck. That being said, mixers can’t be replaced with non-KYC exchanges. The thing about non-KYC exchanges is that when they get enough user funds, they turn into KYC exchanges and then steal everyone’s money. If this hasn’t happened to you yet, it will if you keep using them.

Getting weekly fat pay checks from mixers clouded some users judgement. I too noticed that too but me being right wasn't going to change anything so I didn't say it too often (I think i did it once or twice at least though) and I didn't have to. It would only upset the people who were carrying the mixer signatures even more.

Those mixing services were centralized and nobody knew what data they were logging. It could be anything. As far as I know none of them were open source even if they were, it still wouldn't make any sense to use them because you still wouldn't know the actual code they were running on their servers. To function, they needed other people's coins so them being open source wouldn't make any difference.

If you need privacy, use monero. Bitcoin mixing services never made any sense to begin with. I guess it is all resolved now. I don't think anybody would argue otherwise because nobody is getting paid by any mixers around here anymore Cool

That said, if you go to shitcointalk forum, keep talking the same stuff and they will pitchfork you. How dare you say that to our employers! Heretic.

-Mixers are fiiinee privacy privacy come and buy some privacy buy 2 and get 1 free privacy I'mma sellin the best privacy special offer-