Quote from: goldkingcoiner on Today at 05:33:40 PM

Quote from: OgNasty on Today at 05:09:03 PM

Quote from: goldkingcoiner on Today at 04:21:42 PM

Quote from: JimboToronto on Today at 04:15:44 PM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on Today at 09:12:40 AM

Ross who?

Some guy serving multiple life sentences for creating a website to fill public demand.

You forgot the part where he willingly tried to hire a hitman (who was an undercover agent) to kill someone.

He was not convicted of this as far as I’m aware, making it just a talking point that should not be repeated. He was convicted of running a website that let people sell things. The fact an undercover cop tried to extort and entrap him, eventually stealing, then lying to his bosses until he found himself in jail, shouldn’t be held against Ross.

Quote from: JimboToronto on Today at 05:15:22 PM

Quote from: goldkingcoiner on Today at 04:21:42 PM

Quote from: JimboToronto on Today at 04:15:44 PM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on Today at 09:12:40 AM

Ross who?

Some guy serving multiple life sentences for creating a website to fill public demand.

You forgot the part where he willingly tried to hire a hitman (who was an undercover agent) to kill someone.

He wasn't charged or convicted of those allegations, even if they might of been true.

He was not charged for it, and yes he was entrapped by the undercover agents. But the evidence that he was willing to go for it speaks for itself and I do not think that should be excusable, even if he did not get convicted for it because of technical legal mumbo jumbo reasons.

do you realize the crooked DEA agent busted an underling of Ross. Then stole all the coins the underling was in charge of kept the coins. Then asked Ross if he wanted revenge on the underling. So all the heavy duty crimes were done by the DEA agent. not the naive moron Ross.

This is beyond entrapment. This is a frame up beyond belief no mombo jumbo.