⭐ Merited by vapourminer (1)
Do not worry too much, it never said not at all and if reporters starts getting paid one needs to be worried 
It also says "one accurate report is worth many inaccurate reports" which could be interpreted that being below 70% shoulnd't be a problem at all. Below 70% accuracy is not a problem until the badge/incentives requirements says one must be at least 95% to be eligible.
Print : Sometimes low accuracy % does not reflect one reporting skills - sometimes they just have loads of good reports unhandled unfortunately.
I think that as soon as people are motivated by payments for reporters, the moderators will resign . Imagine how long it will take them to go through all the reports from people who at some point decided to "make money" on reports, but never figured out how to do it right. In the words of Chymist, here on the forum, everything that could be abused will be abused 
.
. Imagine how long it will take them to go through all the reports from people who at some point decided to "make money" on reports, but never figured out how to do it right. In the words of Chymist, here on the forum, everything that could be abused will be abused . Mods are forever ready!!!!
You must have certain X number of total reports + certain accuracy % score to be eligible ( speculations)- this way the system can separate organic reporters from joblers who just want to make money.
Passion>>>>> money
