As I think I've made my opinion about this case very clear, by an --IMO-- exhaustively long and repetitive explanation, I somehow think that instead of a real curiosity and a query for my stance for this case, the question is more to fish or stir something. So, I'll try a different approach to answer to your question:
By what percentage would you say OP is guilty?
By what percentage would you say OP is guilty?
That’s easy, 0%.
Then the exact same percentage is the number of Rollbit's guilt.
I've explained it in what I believe more than extensive. I am not interested to repeat my long explanation of "wearing OP's shoes and seeing through Rollbit's glasses". I'll suggest you to re-read all of OP's thread and his interaction with me if you can't see why I think the exact same percentage is the number of Rollbit's guilt.
As an arbiter, shouldn’t you also focus on holding these platforms to higher standards instead of consistently shifting blame onto users who may not have been fully aware of the risks?
Fortunately, I am not an arbiter. Is that fact lost to you somehow? But yes, I am focusing on having the platforms on this forum to a better [not necessarily higher] standard, that's why I diligently chasing them to get things resolved.
This seems to be a recurring pattern, and I’m not just referring to this case.
Anyways, I was hoping for a genuine answer and wasn’t setting a trap or whatever. You can choose to respond or not.
Anyways, I was hoping for a genuine answer and wasn’t setting a trap or whatever. You can choose to respond or not.
Oh? A recurring pattern? Of me "shifting blame onto users who may not have been fully aware of the risks"? Dare I assume, as you write on this thread, that you consider OP's case is also one of that recurring pattern?
Let's suppose for a second that I consistently shifting blame to users [with OP's case included], it's rather interesting, is it not, that as someone who tries to blame the users instead of attempting a better situation and resolution, I seemingly go to an extensive length to get a middle way by keep on nagging Razer?
[...]
As I mentioned on the earlier paragraph, though, it does not translate as me closing my eyes. I simply wait [and ignore all of the jabs you throw at me] for Rollbit compliance team's conclusion. After that...
[...]
As I mentioned on the earlier paragraph, though, it does not translate as me closing my eyes. I simply wait [and ignore all of the jabs you throw at me] for Rollbit compliance team's conclusion. After that...
[...]Now, as a rebuttal from me, do you mind to do us all a favor and show this concrete proof of me having this recurring pattern of shifting blame? Like you, I am hoping for a genuine answer, but unlike the text that followed, I insist on the answer instead of having you choose to respond or not, as I perceive your words as a libel.
So, certainly, to make it a fact instead of libel, it will be extremely wise to provide evidences to support the statement.