Quote from: holydarkness on January 15, 2025, 04:51:02 PM

Quote from: Horsbyname on January 15, 2025, 02:34:10 PM

When Kirito89 was asking me repeatedly to give him permission to post those emails and conversations publicly, why didn’t anyone stop him or point out that such information shouldn’t be requested publicly? Why didn’t anyone remind him that this kind of data shouldn’t be shared so casually?

I had initially refused because I knew the risks involved, but it felt like if I didn’t comply, people__perhaps even you_might be the first to consider me a cheater, blackmailer, or accuser.

You do realize he asked for this permission more than four times, don’t you? Yet I don’t think you’ve reviewed those exchanges thoroughly.

Umm... actually, I can't find the other instances where he asked permission to publish the data, other than on #94. Unless I am wrong? Do you mind to point us out to the other --at least-- three other instances?

Quote from: Horsbyname on January 15, 2025, 02:34:10 PM

That said, I’ll ask you directly, Holydarkness: Do you personally believe his accusation that I blackmailed them is true? If you believe his claim is true, I would respect your decision to oppose my flag against Duckdice. But if you believe his accusation is false, Support my flag against them until they address and clear everything publicly.

Given that question directly entailed by a term, where if I believe his accusation is true then I have to oppose the flag and if I believe it's wrong then I have to support the flag, I will refrain from giving my opinion for the time being, thank you.

Your flag is based on the whole issues as depicted on your thread, and to support the flag I'll have to affirm to the best of my knowledge that what transpired is true, while what transpired and the reason of the flag is not just about the multi-acc. Or... is it?

So, without further context to validate/invalidate that part of the situation, I don't think I can pull a definitive answer.

Anyway, I realized we had an unfinished discussion about your review that got deleted, I understand correctly that it's against TP's policy to post a review about an experience that happened more than a year ago? Granted, I can find a mention that they prefer a fresh review that is not older than 12 months, but not about they'll delete it as it's against their policy.

https://talkimg.com/images/2025/01/15/OxJ7I.jpeg

Just to keep us assured, did they send you an email about the removal and explained to you that it got deleted due to the reason you specified to us?

When Kirito89 was asking me repeatedly to give him permission to post those emails and conversations publicly, why didn’t anyone stop him or point out that such information shouldn’t be requested publicly? Why didn’t anyone remind him that this kind of data shouldn’t be shared so casually? I’m sure you’ve read this part as well, and I’d like to hear your thoughts on it.

Was Kirito89 not that professional, or was he unaware of his site’s terms, What should we call this? Was he trying to silence me? oR was he attempting to publicly label me a scammer by asking me to give him permission so that he could post the emails he claimed to have received from a blackmailer? I don't believe they actually received any emails from scammers; it could be them creating this drama to discredit my thread against them.

You mentioned that you couldn't find instances where Kirito89 asked for permission to publish the data aside from one. Here are the screenshots again for your reference: https://imgur.com/a/6yTLgbm https://imgur.com/a/17vZu5H https://imgur.com/a/SZHEeZK

If you take the time to read through his responses thoroughly, you’ll notice how many times he has changed his narrative throughout this issue. But honestly, I don’t expect you to point out any of his inconsistencies or mistakes.

Meanwhile, you’ve never asked Duckdice.io representatve to prove their accusations or claims against me. Why is that? Like this one: https://imgur.com/a/pCGawpm

Have you ever asked Kirito89 to prove his claim that I said it’s a coincidence that the blackmailer’s email and mine are similar but different by one letter?

Did you also read where Kirito89 claimed that he found out from his support team that my account was deleted by me? Link: https://imgur.com/a/zBKH7c7

While in another instance, he stated: “We don’t actually delete accounts until it’s user-requested.” Link: https://imgur.com/a/Uj6F1nl

This clearly indicates that a user can’t delete their account independently—it has to be done by support. Doesn’t this contradiction point to another one of his inconsistencies?

Let’s not forget, it was Kirito89 who initially accused me and then shifted the narrative multiple times to align with his convenience. Isn’t it worth questioning?