This account isn't in a signature campaign, nor do they seem to be gunning for a rank-up. Over half their posts are complaining about DuckDice, and despite not getting a resolution of their issue they've decided to stick around and engage. Which is fine. The only problem is most of the time they are using ChatGPT or Grok to write their posts for them.

I'm not actually reporting these posts because they aren't really spam, but adding them to this thread for a neutral tag reference.

Horsbyname

#1

Quote from: Horsbyname on January 23, 2025, 01:08:58 PM

It’s clear now that you’re completely lost in your own web of accusations and contradictions. Just admit it: you’re busted, and you have nothing left to support your baseless claims. Your attempts to shift the narrative and blame others are painfully obvious at this point.

You initially said the connection was based on blackmailer emails, then it shifted to Trustpilot reviews. Now, you’re trying to twist timelines and invent "interesting coincidences" to distract from the fact that you have no evidence to back your accusations.

There are hundreds, if not thousands, of users who have publicly claimed that Trustpilot has deleted their reviews, even when those reviews were verified. This isn’t some groundbreaking “coincidence” you’ve uncovered—it’s a well-known issue with the platform.

You asked me in your previous reply to provide the email from Trustpilot confirming that my review was deleted by them and not by me. I’ve done that, yet now you’re conveniently closing your eyes to it. Why are you ignoring your own request for evidence now that it doesn’t align with your narrative?

For you ref I you permission on January 1st, and this was even confirmed by user Holydarkness in the thread. Your claim about January 3rd is a complete fabrication.

At this point, I’ll let the other users, including Holydarkness, weigh in on your behavior and shifting stories. I’m curious to see what they’ll say about how you’ve handled this situation so far.

I’m still waiting for you to provide the proof you claimed to have. If you can’t, then it’s time to publicly apologize for your accusations.

Despite all this back and forth, you have still not provided a single piece of proof—literally zero evidence—to support your accusations against me. Nothing.

Sapling.ai: 100% Fake
Copyleaks: 100% AI-generated
GPTZero: 100% probability AI generated

#2 (I added the close-parenthesis in bold and the detection rate went from 100% by 2 detectors to all 3 detectors)

Quote from: Horsbyname on January 20, 2025, 10:20:30 AM

You repeatedly asked for my permission to post the emails and conversations publicly to prove your claims. Despite my initial hesitations (due to concerns about privacy and your intentions), I eventually gave you explicit permission to share them publicly. Instead of acting on this, you disappeared from the forum without providing any of the evidence you claimed to have.

Now, you’re returning to ask whether I’m disagreeing with sharing these emails. This is extremely confusing because I had already granted you the permission you sought. Why didn’t you act on it back then?

Earlier in this thread, you stated that you received emails from a blackmailer asking for a ransom, and you claimed these emails were sent from an address identical to mine but differing by one letter. You said you were about to post this evidence publicly after receiving my permission.

Now, however, you’re changing your narrative, claiming that the alleged connection is based on the email address I used for my trustpilot review. Why the sudden shift in your story? If the earlier claims about receiving emails from a blackmailer were true, why are you now attributing this connection solely to a tRustpilot review? Was the blackmailer story fabricated, or are you deliberately shifting the narrative to avoid accountability?

You’re asking me to provide confirmation from trustpilot regarding the review’s removal. I will, but why should the burden of proofs fall on me? Duckdice.io yOU (Kirito89) made the accusations and claimed to have evidence. It’s your responsibility to provide the proof, not mine.

If you genuinely had evidence, why didn’t you secure it back when you first made your accusations? Blaming the removal of the review on your "big mouth" feels like an excuse to cover up the lack of actual proof.

Furthermore, you know exactly what I wrote in that review because you had responded to it. So, why are you now asking me for confirmation from Trustpilot? You were fully aware of the content and context of my review before it disappeared.

Let me be very clear: I did not delete my review. It was removed by Trustpilot.

Sapling.ai: 100% Fake
Copyleaks: 100% AI-generated
GPTZero: 100% probability AI generated

#3

Quote from: Horsbyname on January 11, 2025, 02:05:02 PM

I am writing this to shed light on the deceptive and unethical behavior of Duckdice.io's representative, Kirito89. Over the past several days, I have been falsely accused, misled, and subjected to tactics that seem designed to tarnish my reputation.

False Accusations of Blackmail
Duckdice.io's representative accused me of being a blackmailer, claiming that I sent them emails demanding money. Here is the link to his baseless accusation: https://imgur.com/a/f1771CL
https://imgur.com/a/mlK1XrF

To make matters worse, for the 3rd time, he asked me for permission to share the email in a disrespectful and strongly worded manner, as you can see here: https://imgur.com/a/o4cjb4H

When I asked for proof of this claim, Kirito89 requested my permission to post the emails conversations they received publicly. Here https://imgur.com/a/6yTLgbm

When Duckdice's representative first asked me for permission to post the emails publicly, I ignored the request as I was concerned about my privacy. However, he kept asking persistently, leaving me with no other option. I gave him explicit permission to share the email to clear my name. Here: https://imgur.com/a/tkXAOS1

I have already shared my email address publicly, where you can view the conversation between me and their team. Here is the link: https://imgur.com/a/tvK4qIA.

Since I gave him permission on December 28 (if I am not mistaken), instead of posting the emails as agreed, Kirito89 started a private conversation with user Holydarkness. He then called this a "technical issue," "platform reputation," and "customer love"—terms that seem deliberately vague and avoid addressing the core matter.

After these excuses, he disappeared from the forum, while still remaining in touch with Holydarkness privately. Despite this, he has not returned to address the accusations or provide the evidence publicly.

Meanwhile, my main issue—resolving the fairness of my bets—has been completely dismissed, overshadowed by the baseless accusations he made against me.

There have also been numerous changes in his statements, which I will outline further in subsequent posts to highlight the inconsistencies and lack of transparency.

Account Deletion After Public Post

Duckdice.io deleted my account after I made a public post against them. It appears they took this action to prevent my data from being revealed in public, which raises serious concerns.

To make matters worse, Kirito89 from their support team has been dishonest regarding the account deletion. Initially, he claimed that my account was deleted by me. Here’s the screenshot proving this: https://imgur.com/a/zBKH7c7.

Later, he changed his statement and claimed: “We don’t actually delete accounts until it’s user-requested.” Here’s the screenshot: https://imgur.com/a/Uj6F1nl .

It’s clear that Duckdice.io is trying to cover up something, and they’re not being transparent with their users. I strongly urge anyone using their platform to be cautious, as their claims about account deletion are inconsistent and unreliable.

I asked them: To resolve this issue, I believe Duckdice should publicly apologize here for falsely accusing me and leave a neutral post on my profile acknowledging their mistake. Once that’s done, we can move forward and focus on the main issue that I’ve been consistently raising: the accurate and fair resolution of my bet results.

While user Holydarkness commented on this matter, saying:
"Will skip this as this is none of my business, I don't need this headache, and fully at theirs and your hand."

Additionally here is the link to the specific questions I raised: https://imgur.com/a/pMrYiYL.
I believe Duckdice is playing with users and blaming them when they raise their voices against them in forums. However, with me, they need to act professionally and honestly. Only honesty can save them and resolve this situation fairly.

I would appreciate your support in backing my flag against them until they come forward with a fair and clear resolution.
Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3350

Sapling.ai: 100% Fake
Copyleaks: 100% AI-generated
GPTZero: 67% probability AI generated

Most of this user's posts have at least traces of some AI use in them... I dunno why people just can't write using their own brains, what's the big deal.