Quote from: ryzaadit on Today at 12:45:59 PM

Quote from: memehunter on February 19, 2025, 07:50:21 AM

I second this. This is a really good suggestion that will not only boost the credibility of the casino in question's claim but also remove a big part of the doubt. You (the casino in question) have to do this otherwise, there will be more reasons that you cant be trusted.

BK8 doing these for someone faked the KYC and sent to holydarkness

IMO, casino could share information like the list of multi-accounts, faked documents, IP access to some trusted member like DT. But, for how the provider caught some arbitrage stuff or these... I really doubt they will share how they caught the user. The reason: can be used for a loophole to avoid detection by the user.

This could be reason, why CG (Casino Guru) doesn't want to handle any Sportbet case. It's just to complicated, perhaps you can also try to search up any sportbet case regarding robots, or arbitrage. Did the casino share how they detect those... In my experience reading sportbet case, not a single casino want to share it.

That is why it is not what I suggested to be shared with me. If you read carefully, what I suggested to be shared, either publicly or through private eyes, were the instruction from their provider to initiate the action against OP, to prove that it is indeed the provider's request instead of WE88 abusing their ToS and ban players as they wished.