Quote from: JollyGood on February 28, 2025, 03:22:42 PM

Quote from: BenCodie on February 27, 2025, 11:59:58 PM

"Narcissism is a self-centered personality style characterized as having an excessive preoccupation with oneself and one's own needs, often at the expense of others."

On the lines of your egotistic attitude that I have already alluded to.

"Addicted to, or manifesting, egotism; having an exaggerated view of one's own importance or good qualities. "

I don't make much effort to exaggerate my own importance or my own good qualities. I naturally am who I am, I don't amplify that. I definitely amplify suspicious traits of others who wield power, for obvious reasons. That's still my perspective even after looking back at a lot of my posts.

Quote from: JollyGood on February 28, 2025, 03:22:42 PM

Quote from: BenCodie on February 27, 2025, 11:59:58 PM

I am very concerned with malpractice and corruption about the forum, and asking the questions/saying the things no one else will always expense people who don't want to talk about those topics. Though, it is not out of being self-centered or preoccupied with myself. I am simply disappointed with the forum and how it has turned into a community that is not completely in-line with Bitcoin and its values, and yet succeeds and feeds unaligned people on the back of Bitcoin's name.

You (just as every other member) have a right to ask as many questions as you would like because if questions and debate are cast aside there is not much left in the forum.

Many others share your disappointment with the forum as far as the lack of migration to new software is concerned but probably for other reasons too for example distribution of merits and account rank system to name a few. On this, I can understand any frustration that manifests because members that care about the forum do not like the direction of certain aspects but the manner in which that frustration is channelled is extremely important.

If you are concerned with malpractice and corruption, you should articulate your case in a manner that does not alienate others and is designed to generate a welcomed debate. If you do not trust BC.Game that is your prerogative and of course you have a right to your opinion. Now, if I disagree with your opinion you might suggest I am participating in their signature campaign therefore am biased. I could apply the same logic and state you have an agenda against BC.Game because you are being paid by a competitor casino to participate in their signature campaign. The cycle continues.

It does not change the fact BC.Game have some resolved and some unresolved scam accusations but many casino/gaming websites are the same therefore we can come to our own judgment about them (just you did). Nor does it change the fact BC.Game paid out $7 million to a single winner therefore those that like/support/trust it whether participating in a signature campaign nor not, also have a right to their views.

It seems in the OP you alluded to the view of certain members running giveaways and adding BC.Game to their trust inclusions are effectively corrupt therefore are biased and will defend BC.Game. You then struck it out and that is a positive move. As for your personal grudge against icopress (most if us that recall the incident) are aware it coincided with you making multiple attempts to join his campaigns and refusal to hire you. On that basis it seems (as I am giving the benefit of the doubt) your dislike and distrust of BC.Game is more about your sentiments towards icopress.

A lot of what you said here is fine. I don't have much of a problem with it nor do I have any comments. If there's something you want me to address that I didn't then quote it and I will respond.

Quote from: JollyGood on February 28, 2025, 03:22:42 PM

Quote from: BenCodie on February 27, 2025, 11:59:58 PM

You have called me a narcissist and someone with OCD in a single post...Though being that you are clearly a manipulative person, your comments don't particularly bother me. I believe that a good chunk of the forum who have interacted with you are aware that you are the true narcissist, and either use you as an asset in their power game, or fear getting on your bad side (otherwise attacks just like the one's you follow me with would likely ensue).

I will not seek details of how/why you have concluded I am a manipulative person, instead it is reassuring to know my words did not (and will not) bother you. Having said that, I will try to refrain from using certain words and I will try to engage with you.

Regarding your distrust of BC.Game, it has been noted therefore what remains to be discussed here?

The details involve your purposeful ignorance of the dates in which I began to see red flags with whirl wind - when you claimed that I applied for their campaign despite having red flags, when the truth was that I had noticed red flags many months after I applied for their campaign. You created and locked threads, created walls of text, and even left an invalid neutral trust rating based on this information that you made up or misunderstood.

There's not much else to be discussed, I'm only responding to people in this thread at this point. If I have something to add, I will add it down the track. Time will tell if bc.game are good for this community or not.

Quote from: LoyceV on March 01, 2025, 01:27:17 PM

Quote from: LoyceV on February 25, 2025, 03:33:04 PM

Quote from: BenCodie on February 25, 2025, 02:18:35 AM

Below are the DT users who I have excluded from my trust list for giving positive feedback to BC.Game:

Lol. Last week, you removed me from your Trust list after I called you out on your baseless accusations.
Instead of excluding good users, you should ask yourself why only 1 inactive user included you on him Trust list, while 10 others excluded you.

Lol. Big surprise:

Quote

Trust list for: BenCodie (Trust: +3 / =3 / -1) (558 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2025-03-01_Sat_04.28h)
Back to index

BenCodie Distrusts these users' judgement:
1. ~nutildah (Trust: +18 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (22) 7913 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. NEW ~LoyceV (Trust: +33 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (56) 17222 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. ~JollyGood (Trust: +19 / =2 / -0) (1648 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. NEW ~CLS63 (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (1691 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. ~icopress (Trust: +64 / =0 / -0) (10058 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. ~1miau (Trust: +6 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (11) 7174 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. NEW ~BC.GAME (Trust: +22 / =1 / -0) (177 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. ~Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1443 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. ~Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2463 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. Removed ~~~EarnOnVictor (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (668 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)~~

So how's that power play working out for you OP:

Quote

~BenCodie's judgement is Distrusted by:
1. Timelord2067 (Trust: +23 / =16 / -1) (1281 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. suchmoon (Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (8206 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. nutildah (Trust: +18 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (22) 7913 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. NEW klarki (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (~~DT1~~ (-2) 3313 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. JollyGood (Trust: +19 / =2 / -0) (1648 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. icopress (Trust: +64 / =0 / -0) (10058 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. 1miau (Trust: +6 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (11) 7174 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. Stalker22 (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1443 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. BlackHatCoiner (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (8652 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. Free Market Capitalist (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2463 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. NEW paid2 (Trust: +9 / =1 / -0) (DT1! ( Cool

3354 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. PowerGlove (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (5571 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

There were multiple things that you said and didn't say in our previous conversations that lead to my conclusion that I no longer trust you. I am happy to share the quotes and reasons if you like.

Quote from: LoyceV on March 01, 2025, 02:47:13 PM

Quote from: Don Pedro Dinero on March 01, 2025, 02:34:16 PM

That doesn't sound to me like thick skinned leader behaviour to be honest. I mean, if it were someone else I would see it as normal, but to throw that in his face sounds to me like being upset that he has excluded you and wanting to get in his face.

I'm not upset, it's just funny he did exactly what I expected. Excluding him in retaliation would be bad, and I see no reason to do so.

Quote

Now all you can get is another one of his wall of text in response.

Lol.

I don't need to post a wall of text.

Quote from: BenCodie on February 16, 2025, 01:25:56 AM

LoyceV, I trusted you despite believing your tools should be open source so that they can be self-hosted instead of reliant on your server (and wondering for what reason they aren't), and despite this, still had you as someone I would trust...and while it means nothing in this broken trust system, you are off my trust list. Nutildah, you've always been questionable and I never knew if I trusted your general existence or not, and even though you were quick to put ~BenCodie on your list...now, I officially do not trust you...because you're right, our values are different, and on a personal level I don't believe yours are morally a high enough standard to be trusted.

I lost my trust for LoyceV here and after a pattern of behavior of intentionally ignoring parts of posts that would provide key details to a topic (which I find untrustworthy) I added LoyceV and nutildah to my distrust list.