Quote from: JollyGood on March 04, 2025, 12:02:48 AM

These are the campaigns I found that were/are managed by icopress and you asked to join. You cite Betnomi as a scam yet you yourself asked to be enrolled with the words "Hi. Can I please enter this campaign?". Does this not embarrass you?

eXch: https://ninjastic.space/post/63153170
Webmixer: https://ninjastic.space/post/62914497
eXch: https://ninjastic.space/post/62730290
0xBET: https://ninjastic.space/post/62711173
MixTum: https://ninjastic.space/post/62698826
MixTum: https://ninjastic.space/post/62688851
MixTum: https://ninjastic.space/post/62658980
AgoraDesk: https://ninjastic.space/post/62563061
MixTum: https://ninjastic.space/post/62399331
MixTum: https://ninjastic.space/post/62358636
Betnomi: https://ninjastic.space/post/61460878 (Hi. Can I please enter this campaign?)

It seems somewhat incomprehensible for you to be pushing an agenda about lack of trust towards icopress/Betnomi/Jambler in a thread about you not trusting BC.Game. I doubt anybody reading actually believes this thread is about BC.Game. On the contrary, it seems to be about your sentiments towards icopress ever since he overlooked you when you wanted to participate in several campaigns he managed.

What part of it is embarrassing? That before I dug and learnt more about icopress, I applied to his campaigns? This is just like your whirlwind manipulation all over again. You are failing to acknowledge the time in which things happen. All of what you posted was prior to being more informed. Applying to betnomi was before the fact it was a scam and before I suspected involvement by icopress. Everything else were just normal signature campaign applications, which you could compile for anyone on the forum. Since digging and learning more about icopress and shadow information about the community, I stay away from icopress campaigns and I don't trust icopress as well as a growing list of others. After betnomi, after other red flags that I have found and may one day post about (when there's a air tight case, if ever), I learned he was likely to be a suspicious character and not a good force for the community.

Quote from: CLS63 on March 04, 2025, 08:46:24 AM

I wanted to stay away from this troll here even though my name was mentioned in this subject a few times but I want to answer from now on. What is the exact reason that you added me to this topic?

Do you think there is a mistake about the information on this image?

I'm not a troll.

The mistake in that information is that they gave you money then you gave them a trust rating. You nor the pool risked anything to receive that money, therefore no trust was actually involved. The trust rating was essentially purchased through their sponsorship, a transaction in which you or the "Fantasy Premier League" risked nothing to be a part of. If entities can sponsor groups or members for trust, that is dangerous and will enable those with capital resources to increase their trust by throwing their money around, just as has happened here.

Once could argue the "Fantasy Premier League" risked advertising bc.game for no payment, though that is highly unlikely that any entity would instantly destroy their brand by taking a free ad and then not paying, and this also does not consider if it was paid before the advertising or afterward (if before, there was truly no risk or trust involved here, if anything, bc.game trusted "Fantasy Premier League" to apply the advertisement, which then bc.game leaving trust for "Fantasy Premier League" is more appropriate.