Quote from: holydarkness on March 07, 2025, 10:52:44 PM

Quote from: kingbj21 on March 07, 2025, 09:36:59 PM

Quote from: holydarkness on March 07, 2025, 08:35:33 PM

Quote from: kingbj21 on March 07, 2025, 08:17:39 PM

[...]

HolyDarkness once said people here are just “bots posting the same things.” Seems like that applies perfectly to you—just another Stake PR account responding only when it’s convenient.

Remind holydarkness again exactly what holydarkness said, where, and when?

Because, far as holydarkness's memory served him, he don't think he ever said people here are just pots posting the same things. So... kindly quote holydarkness's post referenced above, here, to make it clear. Lest people think you manipulate statements and mislead with misinformation?

@HolyDarkness – Oh, so now you wanna talk? The ignore button was working just fine until your name got called. Now suddenly, you need “exact quotes” like this is some courtroom drama? Nah, let’s not play games—you walked straight into this one.

🎭 The Act is Over – Time to Answer for Real

🕵️ 1️⃣ If you have NO contact with Stake, why do you constantly insert yourself into their cases?

You claim neutrality, yet you always show up when Stake is being exposed.
Why don’t I see you mediating for users scammed by other casinos? Why does your “independent curiosity” only trigger when Stake is the one under fire?
⚡ 2️⃣ My case was escalated to Eddie & the tech team in DAYS through YOU—now you suddenly have “no influence”?

You had no problem getting my case to the top of Stake’s chain of command. Now you expect people to believe you had nothing to do with it?
Either you have pull with Stake, or you’re lying—which one is it?
🔎 3️⃣ Why is Syztmz handling Stake customer accounts if you’re all just “independent mediators”?

If you’re neutral, how does someone from your circle end up handling Stake customer issues?
Are we supposed to believe this is just another coincidence? That a casino being exposed for fraud just happens to have “independent” people managing accounts?

🚨 You’ve walked right into the real trap.

💡 You demand proof from victims but never ask why Stake refuses to release full betting history under GDPR.
💡 You claim neutrality but have never once outright called Stake a scam.
💡 You act uninvolved, yet you’ve escalated cases faster than Stake’s own support team.
💡 You expect everyone else to provide full transparency—except Stake.

📢 So, tell us, HolyDarkness—what’s the truth? Because you can’t keep playing both sides. If you really have no stake in this game, then why are you acting like a referee for a team you don’t play for?

🎤 Clock’s ticking. Let’s see you talk your way out of this one.

About how the ignore button worked, it's been explained somewhere on your multi-thread. I ignore you, so your post won't show to me by default and I, as stated numerous time too, have to click the "show/hide" adds-on button to read your hidden posts every now and then so I can get the gist of the development without having to dive into the drama.

About the ignore button worked until my name being mentioned, yes, this has also been explained. As I use TG bots, when my name being mentioned, it still notifies me, though I usually just glanced at it and upon realizing that certain names are the one who mentioned me, I either straightly ignore it or [if I have some time to spare and wanted to be amazed] click on it, click the show/hide button, and get myself ready to be perplexed by reading the content, much like what I did to your post above.

This has been explained several times, I am not sure how this concept is still hard to penetrate your understanding of how certain things work.

Now, I address matters that I deemed important enough that it needs to be addressed and clarified, like a smear campaign of my reputation. So, I'll ask again for you to point out where and when did I say such words, "people here are just “bots posting the same things.”". Otherwise, it can be perceived by a lot of overseers as an attempt to paint certain color to my reputation.

Interestingly, at a later post you said,

Quote from: kingbj21 on March 07, 2025, 09:36:59 PM

[...]🚨 You’ve walked right into the real trap.[...]

It is safe to assume you with above statement that you deliberately fabricated the statement? You made a completely false statement, with full awareness, to push certain agenda?

Quote from: kingbj21 on March 07, 2025, 09:36:59 PM

📢 So, tell us, HolyDarkness—what’s the truth? Because you can’t keep playing both sides. If you really have no stake in this game, then why are you acting like a referee for a team you don’t play for?

Nope, I am not playing both sides, I've withdrawn myself. I simply didn't play and only take the spectator seat, jumping in every now and then when certain statements needs to be clarified [like this one].

@HolyDarkness – Withdrawn? Now that’s interesting timing. Is it because Stake is closing down and you see no point in defending them anymore? Or is it just easier to step away quietly now that the exposure is reaching critical levels?

For someone who claims to be a "spectator," you sure spent a lot of time jumping into Stake-related discussions, questioning victims, and defending the house. Now that everything is collapsing, suddenly you’re just an observer?

📌 Let’s get this straight:

🔹 You never called Stake a scam when it mattered.
🔹 You questioned victims instead of questioning the casino.
🔹 You had direct influence when cases needed escalation, but now you act like you were never involved.

And now? Now you "withdraw" because you suddenly don’t care? That’s a classic exit strategy when things are about to go downhill.

🚨 Sorry, but you don’t get to rewrite history. If Stake was still thriving, would you be “withdrawing”? Or is it just that your role isn’t needed anymore now that the house of cards is falling?

Clock’s up. No more PR, no more deflections. You played your part, and now you're trying to vanish before the final crash. Too late.