Quote from: bibilgin on Today at 07:13:05 PM

Quote from: kTimesG on Today at 06:13:14 PM

I said it will take more time, not the same time.

Yes, I'd scan the range (in some amounts of distributed different subranges, in some whatever order), with 100% confidence of finding the key along the way, at some point.

Ok master, everyone understands you now. lol

Everyone understood that it is more logical to start with the ranges you calculated and search for other ranges as you said. (except you)

It will start with the calculated ranges, how many people do you think there are here?

Remember;
1- You have many competitors, their hardware, software or money power is more than you.
2- Everyone has their own special thoughts and strategies.
3- After all these talks, I understood that the people who will agree with you are only those who make decisions because you give information about the kangaroo system and do not really understand what you wrote.

Do you have any work on this subject? Have you guessed any range? Or have others asked you for the prefix? Have you ever proven yourself on something? Have you won a bet?

The Swiss army knife showed the truth. But you lost. Now accept this.

If we were to vote here, you would not be able to get many votes for the idea of scanning the entire range as you said.

WTF...

I'm not looking at neither any address puzzles, nor the 135 puzzle. They will be solved long before I even have 1% chances of success, because:

1. RetiredCoder has a much faster ECDLP solver than anything that was ever made public. He's also a millionaire, you know? He'll solve 135 by end of this year for sure.

2. A retired cryptographer with a seed recovery business, that he owns, wrote this silly brute-force key cracker, that's also faster than anything that was ever made public. All of his investors made up a 125% profit in 67 days, you know?

These guys are your competition, not me. They are busy writing and improving their code, not fighting on a forum. If I would be in their position, trust me, you wouldn't even need to read my replies, as they would no exist - I'd be busy with actual work, you know.

Have you ever, ever, ever thought about WHY neither of those two guys have made public their software? Their actual software, not proofs of concept. I'll give you a hint: because those programs would have a value in hundreds of thousands of dollars, and millions of dollars in long-term.

Skills are valuable, but they must be met with actual results, not fantasies. I could very easily prove to you that your CUDA apps that you use are so slow, that they are laughable. And I an also show mcdouglasx that my kangaroo speeds are also very impressive, but neither of these things would help anyone with anything, except some dudes that would use them on vast.ai to produce some profit. This is, I can guarantee you, the main reasons you won't see RetirecCoder's or Bram's code anywhere near soon.