Quote from: Betpanda on Today at 09:54:15 AM

Quote from: philipma1957 on February 19, 2025, 04:49:32 PM

I like the claim that the op committed fraud justifies the confiscation of all the op's funds. yet they offer zero proof that he did fraud.

We have provided all the necessary proof to justify the actions we have taken.

what proof?
you provided absolutely zero proof or justification other than your words that he committed fraud, and that you are keeping his deposit because you are only following your terms.

Quote from: Betpanda on Today at 09:54:15 AM

Quote from: Zwei on February 19, 2025, 09:34:23 PM

you say he committed fraud, so for sure you can at least tell us what kind of betting fraud he did? right?
was he part of a betting syndicate? was he involved in match fixing, arbitrage, value betting, court siding? what fraud did he do exactly?

Our terms and conditions are not “scammy”, but quite the opposite. They are perfectly aligned with the prevailing regulations of the jurisdiction where we are registered.

We are not obligated to reveal this information publicly, nor would it change the outcome of the situation.

i'm sorry, but having terms that gives you the right to confiscating deposits with no valid reason is scammy.

why not share it if it's not going to change the outcome?
i'm sure everyone here would like to know. and wouldn't that give your claim more credibility?
so why are you hiding this info?