I tried to raise awareness about this in regards to bc.game in this thread however members did not understand the point that the presence of complaints also is an indicator of victims who do not speak, instead my trust rating was impacted for making the thread by the campaign manager of bc.game, who claims that I am "spreading charlatan ideas under the guise of snake oil".
This issue isn't about you... And you're still going on about how the absence of something is evidence of anything. It's not.
It is reasonable to assume that out of the dozens of cases that bc.game have on this forum, that there are others who did not voice their problem on the forum (due to language barriers, unwillingness to comply with KYC, no hope, and so on). The assumption that 100% of those who have issues will use the forum to fight to get their funds back against a large casino is an unreasonable assumption. The proof is in the fact of how many cases there are against them. This applies also to other casinos.
the Curacao Gaming Control Board is very likely to be a deeply corrupt entity or at the very least, has been negligent to a lot of corruption, fraud and malpractice in relation to the licensing scheme which a lot of these casinos in this forum rely on to operate, and those who are using curacao licenses.
The casino being advertised in your signature has a Curacao license.
I've said it plenty of times before, if I don't wear the ad, a degenerate gambler who will wear the ad will give it back to casinos. Just because I don't believe in casinos, does not mean I'm not entitled to the advertising deals that they offer everyone on the forum. I could not care less about what is in my signature as long as they do not blatantly scam. I do not see any betfury scam accusation threads at rates in comparison to bc.game or stake, and if there are cases popping up anywhere near as often, I will stop wearing the campaign and talk to Royse about it.
I don't find it particularly coincidental that a user who is making posts in relation to casino malpractice to have the worst reputation on the forum.
When you find yourself siding with game-protect, its time to take a long, deep period of introspection and perform an evaluation of what exactly are you doing with your time here and your life in general. Its not my fault you don't know who they are or what they did to become the least trusted account ever. Take a few minutes to educate yourself.
I've done enough reading to know game-protect and I am not speaking about that controversial account. I am definitely not going to say that 100% of what game-protect said was untrue, and I am definitely not going to say that the casino establishment did not have any involvement in tarnishing their account. What I will say, is game-protect is one of the accounts that are symbolic of the existence of shady casino practices and the members of the forum that directly or indirectly protect them, your post is a perfect example of that.
What happens if one day you find a thread with proof of all of what I am speaking about, including quotes of of all of your posts, all of which begging the question: did nutildah know all along and was nutildah covering up the truth. Are you going to deny it, and say, "how could I possibly have known?". Or will you own it? If the answer is "how could I possibly have known?" then I ask you - what is your motivation for posting so certainly that nothing shady is going on? Do you see the contradiction?
There is nothing to verify "65,000 to 70,000 people online" or that 235,246 people participate in the daily race. There is nothing to disprove that 50,000+ of these are inflated or controlled by stake themselves to inflate activity and credibility (which is a common thing for corrupt entities t do) and there is nothing to prove that they are real.
Once again, when you make claims like this, its on you to provide the evidence to back them up, not on us to disprove them. Stake gets 55.44 MILLION visits a month. They are blowing the competition out of the water in that regard. So it doesn't seem totally irrational that their numbers would reflect 235,246 active daily participants, or more. This also means that they will have a lot more complaints than the average casino, both present and non-present. Does this mean they are completely clean in every way imaginable? No, it doesn't. But you haven't ever once provided proof or even evidence of jack shit.
The case will be posted eventually. I am not a man of unlimited free time and resources. My research is a low priority hobby with little to no incentive to complete. For all I know, once this monolith of a case is posted, I could be banned, defamed, the thread could very well be deleted. So I'm not in any rush to complete it.
Your post and that statistics/theory within it is weak at best.
Again... You are incapable of doing the slightest bit of introspection.
And you are a 100% honest, upstanding member of the forum who defends nothing but the good of and for the community, who is transparent and does not hide or post in attempt to cover up any damning information about his corrupt and disgusting peers whenever such information starts to seep