Quote from: ABCbits on Today at 08:32:38 AM

I wonder whether the result would be different if the poll thread created by highly-reputable member (have lots of positive feedback, received merit and posts) who don't use chatbot/AI. Based on neutral tag date and thread date, IMO that user create that thread in frustration after other member caught him using chatbot/AI.

When you base your argument on what would have happened if what actually happened had not happened, you are philosophizing, which is more or less the same as bullshitting. Want another example? Here you go:

Quote from: MysteryMiner on February 21, 2025, 07:46:01 AM

There is no legitimate use of generative AI as there is no legitimate use of flooder scripts outputing random garbage on this forum.

And if you want it from one with more reputation here you go:

Quote from: nutildah on February 21, 2025, 11:16:46 AM

As much as I am in general agreement with your sentiment, I can think of one legitimate use: Entertainment! (its all AI-generated based on the image prompt "Fake Image"... and then I also gave it a little instruction for lyrics and music style)

It is clear that there are many more and I have made it clear, and I will not give you more examples because I am tired of it.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:51:53 AM

Your quote below is wrong. It's assigned to my name, but I didn't say that. You did. I am talking about this one:

Fixed.

Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 08:51:53 AM

I don't keep track, no. But I have seen complaints by users who claim that they reported clear AI use and plagiarism in post creation on the forum but the reports were never handled accordingly. Hence my initial reply in your thread.

Check nutildah's thread and you will see that many reports are acted upon.

Quote from: memehunter on Today at 03:18:13 PM

Nice trick,

You can prove me wrong by quoting the post/s from the poll discussion.

No trick, on the contrary you are not going to trick me. I don't have to prove that the bullshit you say is bullshit, if you want to prove otherwise start bringing here quotes from reputable members defending the use of AI in the forum. Or open threads defending its use by those reputable members, because that saying that if threads were opened in this respect as ABCbits says, the outcome would be favorable is a giant mountain of bullshit. I say this from experience because I am the only one who opens threads about it and it has only been after quite a while because the initial general reaction was totally negative.

Quote from: memehunter on March 13, 2025, 11:31:57 PM

No, and I have already explained my reasons in this thread in a 100% similar case.

So what bullshit were you saying about forum policy? If the forum rules considered plagiarism using an AI to present your business the OP would have been banned long ago and the thread trashed.