Re: Beware of DuckDice.io – My Disappointing Experience and Fairness Issues🚨
May I know if the bets result you have now is showing Wining chances? If not how you calculated 33% chances losing streak instead of 15.5%?
As you forget things very quickly when it is a bit against casinos, I will remind you again your statements and Kirito89 Statements upon which we were agreed to make you a BRIDGE between us.
Please read it this time don’t dodge it holydarknees, you have to be a bridge not representative of a casino, if kirito89 has sent you the evidences of his accusations please share it.
As you forget things very quickly when it is a bit against casinos, I will remind you again your statements and Kirito89 Statements upon which we were agreed to make you a BRIDGE between us.
Please read it this time don’t dodge it holydarknees, you have to be a bridge not representative of a casino, if kirito89 has sent you the evidences of his accusations please share it.
I am snipping the rest of your post as they're a false narrative. Addressing the point above as well as explaining [yet again] of what happened:
As stated, it is not under my purview to share the evidence. You can ask DuckDice or Kirito89 if you want to see them, but it not under my right to share any of it as I am --as you write yourself-- just acting as a bridge.
Moreover, I am sure that the agreement is for DuckDice through Kirito89 to share to me, not publicly.
But it seems you forgot the real arrangement of which you both gave your consent. Let me remind you the agreement that you and DuckDice through Kirito89 agreed, since you seemingly "forget" them, because... certainly you did not deliberately trying to twist the narrative by snipping here and there and re-write the scenario:
The whole post of mine, which start the agreement can be found on #8, of which, the snippet that exactly speaking about the point of the agreement is as below:
[...]
But, let's cross all of them. Frankly, I got exhausted by you and your antique. So let's metaphorically forget everything for a minute, let's start a whole new page, let's say I can get Kirito89 to show me what's allowed by DuckDice to be seen by a third party [me] that will prove beyond doubt that you do tried to extort the casino, that you're not as clean and a poor victim of DuckDice as you try [and failed] to portray, do we [the public here is the witness] have your consent to let DuckDice release that info to me, as well as your words that you trust that I'll stand on neutral ground and reported to the public what I see 100% based on what I see, be it in favor of you or to DuckDice?
But, let's cross all of them. Frankly, I got exhausted by you and your antique. So let's metaphorically forget everything for a minute, let's start a whole new page, let's say I can get Kirito89 to show me what's allowed by DuckDice to be seen by a third party [me] that will prove beyond doubt that you do tried to extort the casino, that you're not as clean and a poor victim of DuckDice as you try [and failed] to portray, do we [the public here is the witness] have your consent to let DuckDice release that info to me, as well as your words that you trust that I'll stand on neutral ground and reported to the public what I see 100% based on what I see, be it in favor of you or to DuckDice?
Of which, you gave your agreement on #21, quoted below:
[...]
I am going to trust holydarkness for something that I am sure of, and let’s see what come out.
@holydarkness you have my consent.
But, let's cross all of them. Frankly, I got exhausted by you and your antique. So let's metaphorically forget everything for a minute, let's start a whole new page, let's say I can get Kirito89 to show me what's allowed by DuckDice to be seen by a third party [me] that will prove beyond doubt that you do tried to extort the casino, that you're not as clean and a poor victim of DuckDice as you try [and failed] to portray, do we [the public here is the witness] have your consent to let DuckDice release that info to me, as well as your words that you trust that I'll stand on neutral ground and reported to the public what I see 100% based on what I see, be it in favor of you or to DuckDice?
I am going to trust holydarkness for something that I am sure of, and let’s see what come out.
@holydarkness you have my consent.
But, let's cross all of them. Frankly, I got exhausted by you and your antique. So let's metaphorically forget everything for a minute, let's start a whole new page, let's say I can get Kirito89 to show me what's allowed by DuckDice to be seen by a third party [me] that will prove beyond doubt that you do tried to extort the casino, that you're not as clean and a poor victim of DuckDice as you try [and failed] to portray, do we [the public here is the witness] have your consent to let DuckDice release that info to me, as well as your words that you trust that I'll stand on neutral ground and reported to the public what I see 100% based on what I see, be it in favor of you or to DuckDice?
Of which, DuckDice through Kirito89 gave their consent that seal the deal on #25:
[...]
Hi there, I agree with this
. Will send you all relevant information. 1. Showing OP has lied about his bets, 2. Emails from him asking for money.
Kirito89,
Duckdice Support.
Hi there, I agree with this
. Will send you all relevant information. 1. Showing OP has lied about his bets, 2. Emails from him asking for money.Kirito89,
Duckdice Support.
As can be seen, the new deal you both entered is fulfilled from DuckDice's side, as do me from my side. Yours though, was not fulfilled; to trust me that I am standing on neutral ground when reviewing what's given to me and reported 100% based on what I seen. In fact, we can safely consider [beyond doubt, if I may add] that you violated it not long after [in #42] I gave my findings which was based on the evidence given,
[...]
Now Let’s see why I doubted you that you are not neutral at all
[...]
Now Let’s see why I doubted you that you are not neutral at all
[...]
The findings itself validate what Kirito89 said about the bets, that in my findings, there were no losing streak that much, that I even use the help of AI to process the thousands of entries shown to me. And that you indeed emailed them to ask for refund. Standing alone, IMO, that was not a smoking gun itself, a bit hot at the nozzle, but the smoke was not there. But then, you pressed the trigger, and now the gun is smoking and your hand is red:
[...]
It was not a blackmailing attempt at all it was a fair offer
It was not a blackmailing attempt at all it was a fair offer
And this is why you go with your crusade, snipping posts and replaying words and words in an attempt to twist the narrative that got revealed upon the proof given by DuckDice.
Let me ask again, since you seemingly keep avoiding it, so we can get it clear: A fair offer for what, if I may ask? I thought all you seek is transparency? A clarification of DuckDice Provable Fairness. So, what offer is that?
Please help us all understand that before you start with your new argument. Though I am not sure what else to argue, since the provable fairness and transparency issue is already cleared.