Quote from: Horsbyname on Today at 11:03:52 AM

Quote from: holydarkness on March 17, 2025, 06:42:23 PM

I am snipping the rest of your post as they're a false narrative. Addressing the point above as well as explaining [yet again] of what happened:

They are not false at all, the post I posted is all your statements and Kirito89 statements, how you can call it false? You have violated your own rules, there wasn’t any new agreement at all.

This is an excuse that you can’t share the evidences- Still you are making conclusion base on it, You don’t have any evidences at all.

I am failed to see the connection between my inability to share the evidence due to my capacity as a third party that has no right to the data sharing, with the ability to make a conclusion based on the said evidence, that I've seen with my eyes.

Quote from: Horsbyname on Today at 11:03:52 AM

You have abandon many of your statements time to time just to defend duckdice.io, Here are few that you abandoned already:

You Stated earlier that there is no data on earth which can show the details of my bets. And if duckdice.io provide one its mean they are cheating and it will a suicide situation for duckdice.io

[...]

Now as you already stated above regarding GDPR how come you got the bets results? Is this enough to disprove all your statements? Did duckdice.io now committed suicide?

Marble indeed. Marble indeed.

It's been explained, I believe more than once. If you're truly looking for transparency, you'll read every post carefully and won't miss this explanation, so I am not sure why you still failed to understand that part.

Initially, there were not any possible way to retrieve your betting history, until you gave the screenshot of your betID, that can be used to "replicate" [not sure if "replicate" is the right term here] your betting session. As done by khaleed, and you later add more info that made the compiled data unusable.

Later though, as can be witnessed from the date-stamp of my post that I snipped from your post so it won't be a tangle of pyramid-quote, months later, DuckDice realized that the betID did not just enable them to replicate the betting session. Upon being matched with their internal data, of which has no name and ownership as the player who used to own the data has enacted the rights to be forgotten, a simple series of number, it enabled them to get the server seed, the data that is theirs; the server's, as in DuckDice's.

The server seed itself was previously impossible to be fished out and be associated with you, since it has no ties to any player, they're nameless data stored in their RAM or SSD, or whatever storage they use. But with your provided betID, that still took DuckDice months to realize that it also serves such purpose, it was made possible: to enable them to identify to whom did the server's seed used to be assigned to.

The data is basically still nameless, a series of bets made by an unknown. But, again, thanks to your betID, they can tie it to you, as the server's seed and the series of seeds that follows or preceeded it matched the server seed in your betID.

Is it still hard to be understood?

Quote from: Horsbyname on Today at 11:03:52 AM

[...]
Now let’s see what you have stated earlier-and for what you were going to be a bridge

Quote from: holydarkness on December 31, 2024, 04:12:36 PM

[...]

I will leave you in no state to call it false again

Quote from: holydarkness on January 01, 2025, 03:21:53 PM

[...]

I'll deliberately leave my quoted post still kinda quoted this time, just to show the timestamp. That's kinda the beauty of the forum, isn't it? All is timestamped, properly well documented without much effort.

If it's hard for you to understand, let me spell it out: as can be seen, it was quotes from December 2024 and January 2025, those whole convoluted entanglement of accusations from both sides that was ultimately impossible to unravel, the red bar of steel, the whole proof me wrong and prove me being the sender, etc etc etc. of which, later, in 26th February, I offered to metaphorically forget everything, to start a clean sheet and leave those unravelable things behind and get to the root of everything that you insist is your true goal: the provable fairness and the transparency, of which, I asked you both to enter a new agreement and consent

Quote from: holydarkness on February 26, 2025, 09:03:28 PM

[...]
But, let's cross all of them. Frankly, I got exhausted by you and your antique. So let's metaphorically forget everything for a minute, let's start a whole new page, [...]

Timestamp, date, pay very close attention to it, because it is indeed very beautiful and useful to explain things to you and show the overseers what chronologically happened. And especially useful to thwart your attempt to mess with the timeline as shown below. Again, pay attention to the date and timestamp:

Quote from: Horsbyname on Today at 11:03:52 AM

Regarding the Agreement don’t forget it’s still there on the thread- Ummm I will quote it here to let you know what the agreement was based on actually

This is a repeated quote of what's already quoted above, sans the content as it's just to show the timestamp where I offered you both and asked for the consents for the newest attempt to get things resolved and proven, 26th of February, 2025:

Quote from: holydarkness on February 26, 2025, 09:03:28 PM

[...]

This is you and your words upon agreeing and giving your consent, 4th of March, 2025:

Quote from: Horsbyname on March 04, 2025, 09:19:02 AM

[...]
I am going to trust holydarkness for something that I am sure of, and let’s see what come out.

@holydarkness you have my consent.

This is DuckDice through Kirito89 entering the agreement with their terms as well as their consent, on March 5th, 2025, 10:44:09

Quote from: Kirito89 on March 05, 2025, 10:44:09 AM

Hi there, I agree with this

. Will send you all relevant information. 1. Showing OP has lied about his bets, 2. Emails from him asking for money.

Kirito89,

Duckdice Support.

Those "terms" you said is yours, was not the clause of the term you wrote upon giving your consent, it was added later on, by 5th of March 2025, 09:57:29, with no agreement or even acknowledgement from anybody.

You agreed to trust me to be the third party who will review evidences that DuckDice will give, that I will be on neutral ground and conveyed what I see. If which I did, and DuckDice did, and you did not. Again, the "clause" you added later by 5th of March, was not in the agreement, though I am sure Kirito89 still addressed the matter somewhere.

I hope you understand now that what we were agreed on is completely covered. All of them. In details. You asked about the transparency and fairness, DuckDice provided a betting log that got reconstructed from the server seed extracted from one's betID, I verified that there were not any 158 losing streak. Not even 20, if we rely on the data being processed by the AI when I asked to summarize the longest win/lose streak.

With this proven, the case should be enough to be cleared and marked as resolved.

Quote from: Horsbyname on Today at 11:03:52 AM

I hope you will Understand now that what we were agreed on is not covered-actually none of them, you didn’t act as bridge, the evidence you claimed you have is all from me, I was the one who posted it 3 months earlier in this forum to disprove Kirito89 accusations

Nope, what I see was thousands of entries of betting log of someone. Did you provide that to the forum three months earlier?

Quote from: Horsbyname on Today at 11:03:52 AM

Now your tricky question
[...]
Why I asked for my loses back? What was the “Fair offer”?

This is what the fair offer was based on : https://imgur.com/a/8wSxYM9 . You already tried your best to make me look like a scammer.

Still doesn't explain how threads which aim is to look for transparency and prove the provable fairness of DuckDice contain a "fair offer" for DuckDice to pay you. Mind to explain it again? Because that two, I think, can't coexist. They're an either-or. Either you're looking for transparency [which you emphasized several times that transparency is your priority, and that you do not want DuckDice to pay anyone a single penny, that you stand by that] or asking for funds as "fair offer".

While we're at it, how does the fair offer come, again? From someone who stand by the word that they don't want DuckDice to pay a single penny?

Quote from: Horsbyname on Today at 11:03:52 AM

There is no new arguments, the new arguments are coming from you and kirito89, Posted above are the evidences of your narrative changes.

When you are going to ask kirito89 for the proof of his accusations? Even thought it was supposed to be done earlier but……

Nope, the arguments come from you, when you backed down from your own word that you gave upon your consent, that binds you both on the new agreement. Always from you, we're here just tying the loose end that you failed to understand, repetitively explaining the points that you'll yet again failed to understand, as you choose not to, because if you admit that you understand the findings and the situation, you'll admit that the case can be closed now, since the transparency and the provable fairness is proven: there were not any 158 losing streak.