I am snipping the rest of your post as they're a false narrative. Addressing the point above as well as explaining [yet again] of what happened:
They are not false at all, the post I posted is all your statements and Kirito89 statements, how you can call it false? You have violated your own rules, there wasn’t any new agreement at all.
This is an excuse that you can’t share the evidences- Still you are making conclusion base on it, You don’t have any evidences at all.
You have abandon many of your statements time to time just to defend duckdice.io, Here are few that you abandoned already:
You Stated earlier that there is no data on earth which can show the details of my bets. And if duckdice.io provide one its mean they are cheating and it will a suicide situation for duckdice.io
The fact that they can't make a rebuttal of you having 158 losing streak because they can't look at it on your betting history in their database, would indicate that the history itself is, indeed, no longer exist.
Why is it no longer exist? Because it's removed.
Why is it removed? Because of the right to be forgotten.
Where's the proof of it? Nothing. Not from their side. It's being forgotten. Burned.
It's a really simple situation that I am sure everybody reading this case can easily understand. I hope you can understand the situation that applied now too.
DuckDice wrote all of your information. Your name, DoB, address, other KYC related things, your deposit and withdrawal history, your betting log, your bonuses, your chat, your complaints, your email, every single thing tha happened to a "horsbyname" during his stay in DuckDice.
So, the book burned.
If they can provide it, it means the data was not erased and their statement that your data is no longer exist is false, thus, a lie, and logically they will not say this as it'll be a reputation-suicide. Thus, even if they have it as you never asked for removal, they will not provide it.
Now as you already stated above regarding GDPR how come you got the bets results? Is this enough to disprove all your statements? Did duckdice.io now committed suicide?
Of Provable Fairness due to Losing Streak
The spreadsheet given to me was not like the previous attempt made in collaboration with Khaled0111 where the list shows the longest losing streak in under or over. The spreadsheet that is in my possession, however, is basically the betting history of the player itself, his winning and his losing. 0 and 1. A yes and a no. A win and a lose.
With about thousands of entries that made my eyes water just to scan them, not only that the statement of playing in 15.5% chance is unfounded as the bets were made with 33% chance, the more important point that I think is better to be pointed out rather than the 33% v. 15.5% is that I can not find a losing streak of 158 times. Not even a 50 losing streak in a row.
With this, I believe I can safely say that the claim of 158 losing streak at 15.5% is unproven to be true.
Remember those are all your statements not mine, don’t you call it false anymore, Instead address it why you changed itNow let’s see what you have stated earlier-and for what you were going to be a bridge
And oh, perhaps give your consent for FJ DuckDice to share your email? To prove or disprove their rebuttal about similar email address with the scammer? If you feel uncomfortable with your account being publicly disclosed, I'd like to offer an option where they send it to me, for-my-eyes-only basis, and I'll reproduce a screenshot of that proof they have me, with several characters of the email being censored. I'll give my best to find a balance where it's enough to maintain privacy yet also prove [or disprove] the similarities.
I will leave you in no state to call it false againKirito89, I've got a written consent through PM from OP to validate the situation of similar email account. It came with several terms, but after mulling over it the entire day, I think the best approach is to actually leave both parties in the blind, so, simplified, kindly provide me [through PM, not here publicly] the evidence of those email similarities, and I'll take it from there, if you don't mind.
Regarding the Agreement don’t forget it’s still there on the thread- Ummm I will quote it here to let you know what the agreement was based on actually
Anyway lets come to the proofs point.
Kirirto89 you have to show your evidences of me Sending blackmailing emails for 0.01btc
2. Trustpilot link- that my review was posted from the same email you was blackmailed from for 0.01 btc.
3. That I didn’t played on 15.5% chances but 33% chances.
4. You have provide evidences that the blackmailing email you have received is from the same email similar to mine but different with one later.
We are at the point where Kirito89 gotta back his accusations. I’ve accepted your deal, gave consent already Now the ball’s in his court.[/b][/color]
I hope you will Understand now that what we were agreed on is not covered-actually none of them, you didn’t act as bridge, the evidence you claimed you have is all from me, I was the one who posted it 3 months earlier in this forum to disprove Kirito89 accusationsNow your tricky question
Let me ask again, since you seemingly keep avoiding it, so we can get it clear: A fair offer for what, if I may ask? I thought all you seek is transparency? A clarification of DuckDice Provable Fairness. So, what offer is that?
Please help us all understand that before you start with your new argument. Though I am not sure what else to argue, since the provable fairness and transparency issue is already cleared.
Why I asked for my loses back? What was the “Fair offer”?
This is what the fair offer was based on :
https://imgur.com/a/8wSxYM9 . You already tried your best to make me look like a scammer.
There is no new arguments, the new arguments are coming from you and kirito89, Posted above are the evidences of your narrative changes.
When you are going to ask kirito89 for the proof of his accusations? Even thought it was supposed to be done earlier but……