Quote from: Stepstowealth on January 02, 2025, 11:26:27 PM

As someone who is exposed to gambling and the casino ecosystem, I like to know if you would prefer to be a game owner or provider who has his game on different casinos or you prefer to be a casino owner who has different games featured on your casino?
Which of them do you think there will be more profit in?

I think that being a game owner is more profitable than being a casino owner.

A game owner has more users. He gets different types of users from different parts of the country. These users invest a large amount. This makes a game owner more profitable. Users have some doubts about the payment of games. Many game owners do not pay users. Due to this many new games cannot enter the market.

On the other hand, the casino owner does not have the opportunity to commit such fraud. The casino owner collects a certain amount of money as a toll at a certain rate from the games that the casino owner runs in his casino. In this, the more games are played in his casino, the more income he will have.

The casino owner basically earns income on the number of rounds played in his casino. The rounds of these games are different on each board.

So I would say, that if someone wants to do a risk-free business, it is better for him to do a casino business. If he does business legally, he will be profitable. On the other hand, if someone wants to become a banana tree overnight by devouring the property of others, then it is better for him to own the game. But he has to do this very cleverly.