Quote from: teukon on May 03, 2014, 01:50:18 PM

Quote from: discobean on May 03, 2014, 12:20:32 PM

Quote from: Aditya on May 03, 2014, 05:28:21 AM

Actually we have MicroBitcoin (μBTC) already. Why change it to Bits?

I prefer μBTC (spelled: uBit)

Why change it to bits? Because you just explained the same thing in 3 different ways, μBTC, MicroBitcoin and uBit.

You're right. 3 ways is simply not enough. We must introduce a 4th!

can we all realise mBTC and uBTC are not FUTURE PROOFING.. they are just temporary. we need to think about FUTURE-PROOFING

so please get with the program.. the mbtc and ubtc arguments are futile and repeated to death, move on and evolve passed the old stuff and think of the future..

so lets think about RELEVANT names for 100sat's that have NOT been used, but show some relevance to bitcoin ecosystem