Quote from: Bram24732 on Today at 10:42:31 AM

I literally proposed a protocol to separate what's true from what isn't and you outright dismiss it, without even challenging it.
Who's the verbalist, really ?

You didn't even tell us how to find John. Designing your own protocol is cheating. Cheesy

You have such high-level equipment. Did you do what I said? No.
Then you expect me to come to your fraudulent protocol?

Quote from: kTimesG on Today at 10:49:08 AM

I wonder what one Believer would do if they stumble upon a 68-bit (or longer) prefix, or whatever has a less than 1 in 2**68 chances of being observed relative to their probability "rules".

Queue up the whole range as the next best option, to find the next 68+ key, or...? Maybe skip it? =))

Cheesy

PS: I forgot, this definitely can't happen. Sorry guys, my bad.

Still a joke, pretending to be knowledgeable.
They really messed up most of the things you memorized. (I guess you're one of those who said old MD5, SHA1 is unbreakable.) lol

I don't even pay attention to you with your sarcastic attitude that is not based on any data. Child (Old Child).. Cheesy