Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 1
Last scraped
Scraped on 20/04/2025, 11:22:55 UTC
I literally proposed a protocol to separate what's true from what isn't and you outright dismiss it, without even challenging it.
Who's the verbalist, really ?
Who's the verbalist, really ?
You didn't even tell us how to find John. Designing your own protocol is cheating.
You have such high-level equipment. Did you do what I said? No.
Then you expect me to come to your fraudulent protocol?
I wonder what one Believer would do if they stumble upon a 68-bit (or longer) prefix, or whatever has a less than 1 in 2**68 chances of being observed relative to their probability "rules".
Queue up the whole range as the next best option, to find the next 68+ key, or...? Maybe skip it? =))
PS: I forgot, this definitely can't happen. Sorry guys, my bad.
Queue up the whole range as the next best option, to find the next 68+ key, or...? Maybe skip it? =))
PS: I forgot, this definitely can't happen. Sorry guys, my bad.
Still a joke, pretending to be knowledgeable.
They really messed up most of the things you memorized. (I guess you're one of those who said old MD5, SHA1 is unbreakable.) lol
I don't even pay attention to you with your sarcastic attitude that is not based on any data. Child (Old Child)..
Original archived Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
Scraped on 20/04/2025, 11:17:48 UTC
I literally proposed a protocol to separate what's true from what isn't and you outright dismiss it, without even challenging it.
Who's the verbalist, really ?
Who's the verbalist, really ?
You didn't even tell us how to find John. Designing your own protocol is cheating.
You have such high-level equipment. Did you do what I said? No.
Then you expect me to come to your fraudulent protocol?
I wonder what one Believer would do if they stumble upon a 68-bit (or longer) prefix, or whatever has a less than 1 in 2**68 chances of being observed relative to their probability "rules".
Queue up the whole range as the next best option, to find the next 68+ key, or...? Maybe skip it? =))
PS: I forgot, this definitely can't happen. Sorry guys, my bad.
Queue up the whole range as the next best option, to find the next 68+ key, or...? Maybe skip it? =))
PS: I forgot, this definitely can't happen. Sorry guys, my bad.
Still a joke, pretending to be knowledgeable.
They really messed up most of the things you memorized. (I guess you're one of those who said old MD5, SHA1 is unbreakable.) lol
I don't even pay attention to you with your sarcastic attitude that is not based on any data. Child (Old Child).. lol