Quote from: nutildah on Today at 02:00:29 PM

Quote from: Free Market Capitalist on Today at 08:57:39 AM

It is nice that I make you laugh but what happens here is the opposite, that those hands for someone who doesn't know much about poker may look like collusion but if you know poker you see that they don't prove anything.

I tend to favor taking their word over OPs, independent of anything outside of this thread.

Why? OP showed several hands that show normal results. He is open to share everything. SWC on the other hand just put out words, without 1 single proof. It would be SO EASY to defend their actions, yet just ignoring questions about proof remain unanswered.
So in your opinion the word of a site is worth that much? They refuse to share the hands in question, even having the possibility to black out names of the player involved they are claiming to "protect", talking about privacy and such nonsense.

I distrust SWC for a very long time already, long before this case. When I reported collusion the did absolutely NOTHING. They kicked me out of the telegram group for even mentioning it. That's behavior of people that are trying to hide something.

There is a reason why their player count doesn't even surpass 200 people at the same time, because nobody trusts this site, even though they are around for such a long time.
Right now only, 146 people playing on 6 active tables with more than 1 player sitting. Thriving business huh.

My suspicion, they just want to keep one of their "highrollers" happy, the one that lost some money and then complained, just to keep him around. With a tiny player base of course they do something like this. Just blame some newbie accounts because the other guy lost.
By the way, why haven't we seen 1 suspicious hand shown here form LastcallS, he was the one the made the report, so he has the hand history as well. Show some suspicious hands. You must have some samples that you sent SWC, or not?