Quote from: LoyceV on Today at 10:04:02 AM

Quote from: Perfectbaby on Today at 09:20:13 AM

Well, does that mean that op deserved the given feedback from your own judgement?

Like I said, he was claiming LN-transactions happen offline. That's not true, which makes the feedback factually correct.

That's new low, now community don't see the difference between terminology mixup and in what context it's been told but I think that's not the reason why he tagged, it is because I said the trail breaks with LN and he said NO, it doesn't but he is someone who explain things in detailed didn't gave me anything much other than this.

Quote from: Satofan44 on June 11, 2025, 10:31:49 PM

No, this is not true. The link is not broken and there are many ways you can be tracked. Please don't give incorrect information here.

Quote from: LoyceV on Today at 10:04:02 AM

Quote

To me, I don't see any reason to be given such feedback as I believe that op can be corrected.

OP hasn't even bothered to correct his post, even after he realized it was wrong.

I didn't edit the post but in the following replies on the same thread I explained why I think it is untraceable.

Quote from: Bitcoin Smith on June 15, 2025, 03:53:51 PM

~
My knowledge about bitcoin and it's technical knowledge is limited to bitcointalk only not go to an extent of making my research paper, so every time if I have a query I simply refer The Lightning Network FAQ and in this case I used

Quote from: Rath_ on June 26, 2019, 09:36:04 PM

Are Lightning Network payments more anonymous than on-chain transactions?

Yes, Lightning Network payments are more anonymous. They use onion routing. In short, when a payment is being routed, an intermediary node knows only the previous and the next node in the path. It is impossible to tell who initiated the payment and what the final destination is.

If what I said is false information then the guide which received hundreds of merit have wrong information too or I am reading things differently? Well anyways to prove it technically I only used "almost impossible" ≠ "impossible" which is not anything but agreeing with Sato's opinion of there are ways it can be done but I don't want to hide under that, I even responded to him that I am happy to learn if you say how it's done and change what I have told.

Quote from: Satofan44 on Today at 12:05:32 PM

Quote from: Perfectbaby on Today at 09:20:13 AM

Well, does that mean that op deserved the given feedback from your own judgement?
If yes! then do you know if they tried exchanging pm to resolved it internally, and they both didn't aligned?

Neither did he ~~sent me a message~~, respond to the report in the thread where it was made, nor did he correct his post. He didn't even accept responsibility at all and has instead shifted the blame for his actions onto me. Does this not tell you enough? Undecided

So now you even started to tell lies? I responded in the reported thread itself [1],[2]

1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5482297.msg65482294#msg65482294
2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5482297.msg65483077#msg65483077

In both replies I explicitly asked why I am wrong and I am happy to learn if I wrong here.

Quote from: Bitcoin Smith on June 14, 2025, 11:20:00 AM

I am happy to learn though cause that's what this place is about.

Quote from: Bitcoin Smith on June 14, 2025, 04:09:00 PM

~ I am not dismissing that as long as it's valid with clear explanation.

I didn't send a PM regarding this because I thought we can't come into any mutual agreement. I am not sure what I can discuss further, do you think the tag isn't necessary if I edit the post?