Re: Incorrect Feedback?

Well, does that mean that op deserved the given feedback from your own judgement?
If yes! then do you know if they tried exchanging pm to resolved it internally, and they both didn't aligned?

Neither did he ~~sent me a message~~, respond to the report in the thread where it was made, nor did he correct his post. He didn't even accept responsibility at all and has instead shifted the blame for his actions onto me. Does this not tell you enough? Undecided

So now you even started to tell lies? I responded in the reported thread itself [1],[2]

1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5482297.msg65482294#msg65482294
2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5482297.msg65483077#msg65483077

In both replies I explicitly asked why I am wrong and I am happy to learn if I wrong here.

Whops, my bad. I don't remember that post because it was useless. I retract that part of my statement.

Quote from: Bitcoin Smith on Today at 01:34:47 PM

Quote from: LoyceV on Today at 10:04:02 AM

Quote from: Perfectbaby on Today at 09:20:13 AM

Well, does that mean that op deserved the given feedback from your own judgement?

Like I said, he was claiming LN-transactions happen offline. That's not true, which makes the feedback factually correct.

That's new low, now community don't see the difference between terminology mixup and in what context it's been told but I think that's not the reason why he tagged, it is because I said the trail breaks with LN and he said NO, it doesn't but he is someone who explain things in detailed didn't gave me anything much other than this.

Quote from: Satofan44 on June 11, 2025, 10:31:49 PM

No, this is not true. The link is not broken and there are many ways you can be tracked. Please don't give incorrect information here.

The answer is in the same post that you quoted and cut off, you are just a very lazy spammer. Worse, there is also an answer in a previous post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5546439.msg65473020#msg65473020.

Quote from: Satofan44 on June 11, 2025, 10:31:49 PM

I hope that you have understood that my answer applies pretty much directly to LN as well. Just think about it, starting with the address reuse example. In addition, there are probably some LN specific concerns. Reading a paper such as this one could be interesting to you: https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.12470.

Please stop wasting everyone's time, you are clearly wrong and are not interested in learning much or taking responsibility.