Quote from: Don Pedro Dinero on Today at 07:53:40 AM

Quote from: Die_empty on Today at 07:46:24 AM

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on Today at 06:58:21 AM

Whatever AI program that was used to assist you in writing this insipid nonsense, OP, it sucks. I'm not buying that these are your words for a single minute--this pseudo-blog style of writing is exactly what the output would be after a shitposter input a load of flyblown horse dung..

Except the OP is using other tools to humanise his posts, but I checked this original post in three different AI detectors from the AI Spam Report Reference Thread:
GPTZero
Sapling
Quillbot
And the results were that it was written by a human. Maybe OP should clarify how he wrote the post.

Apart from those, I have also passed it through copyleaks. With those results I don't see that the OP has to explain anything. The Sceptical Chemist probably didn't like the OP's style at all, which is very respectable, and confused it with generated AI.

On the issue in question, I would not like to see the issue so politicised, but if it were not, it probably would not have gained the importance it has today. It seems to me that I am in a catch-22 situation.

I am struggling to get it right here pls. Are these positions of ai used tool taking center stage in the post because it is from a new? Am not dumped in real life for a newbie in the forum. I am glad you had to check the post for ai because I have before now gone through most of the rules in the forum before starting to drop contributions. Can we go back to the main topic pls?