Quote from: Rating Place on Today at 03:42:29 PM

Quote from: Shishir99 on Today at 01:18:22 PM

Quote from: Rating Place on July 22, 2025, 05:00:26 PM

I’m a player’s advocate and these cases are easy. The casino accuses a player of breaking a rule. Holy asks the rule broken. Then the player refutes the claim. Proof is given to holy and he makes a decision.

You are just an asshole trying to make yourself look important. But you have failed to prove yourself important in every case. You appear to be someone of a God-like Nature, and you can help people with your logical thinking. But I don't remember seeing any cases that you were able to solve. You are just pinching holydarkness in every case and triggering him with stupid questions. Why don't you open your mediation service and help people?

I am bored seeing scam accusations against BC game every week. It would be better to open a portal for BC game victims so they can report it to you. Be a man and do something better instead of poking people.

I'm in very few cases but don't let the facts get in the way. Sometimes you have to be an asshole. holy ruled against the XYes players. By being an asshole in multiple threads it helped get a player paid. He ruled against the $300,00 Bet Fury player. He's wrong there too. When a case pops up where a player is going to wrongly lose his money, this asshole will be there.

The fact? LOL. Again, the misleading narrative, huh? It grows upon your pile of unaddressed points I kindly ask you to clarify, and the reason why I don't put you on ignore, but rather manually ignoring you and treat your post like a toothless dog barking: because you have tendency to spin narrative.

XYes cases got paid despite the violation is no thanks to you, it happened after a thorough talk with their representatives and as a gesture of their good will. Your assholeness, as proven, lead them to leave the forum for good as few days after you "help with the case", the casino withdrawn themselves completely from the forum. And only god knows what this "disagreement" you have with them is, that prompt them to leave the forum. I was fine talking with them for few weeks, and in couple of days, after you offer your "help", they leave. Mysterious, huh?

I'll add this to point 6 of questions that I'll repeat each time you try to mislead people and smear me, to put light into who you really are. Point 6: what disagreement is this that made them think the forum is not for them?

Next, holy ruled against the 300,000 case against BetFury? holy simply lose interest in going back and forth between the player and the casino and interested in getting them into a number to settle instead. holy said and holy quote:

Quote from: holydarkness on July 22, 2025, 07:15:32 PM

Quote from: dplay on July 22, 2025, 07:05:01 PM

[...]

I believe there is a misunderstanding from your side here. I am not in interest to discuss further whether your accusation is valid, their counter-accusation is valid, ToS was broken, a combo was wrongly voided, a combo was rightfully voided, or anything else. I am here simply to bridge you both to a number.

I don't want to sound rude, and I am not trying to be rude, I simply state plainly what I have in mind: it's either you take what they offer, counter-offer with something reasonable from the range they offer so I can ask them to reconsider [I don't think they will], or find someone to adddress all of those paragraphs you write above.

Anything beyond that, is out of my hand.

So, apparently holy ruled against the player when he doesn't interested on the whodunnit and chase a number to settle instead? Hmm... interesting.

Oh, while I am addressing your post, I certainly not the only one missing the irony here, right? Though at this point, it's rather moot as IIRC you've proudly declare your stance on cases on numerous time:

Quote from: Rating Place on July 22, 2025, 05:00:26 PM

I’m a player’s advocate and these cases are easy. The casino accuses a player of breaking a rule. Holy asks the rule broken. Then the player refutes the claim. Proof is given to holy and he makes a decision.

Everyone else does it this way. Don’t go outside of the accusation. If you do, then you are taking a side. Most of these books are crooks, don’t help them.
[...]

You are taking side, so what are you doing here? On a section of the forum that requires neutrality?

Don't bother to answer that, it's a retort. Focus your brainpower on addressing the points below the line instead, it's the list that'll grow more and more as you tried to steer a narrative and put me into certain color, and I point out the discrepancies and your shameless attempt.

Quote from: holydarkness on June 26, 2025, 09:56:06 PM

[...]
So to summarize, kindly clarify these:

1. You advised people to avoid casino detection. As an owner of a thread which rate casinos, what then? If players do your advise and avoid detection and got caught by whatever ToS violation? What do you expect us, as the forum, do?
2. Show us prove that I make up things and posting rules that's not from XYes page and adding CLV on my own.
3. You'll bet whatever I want to bet that I can or can not prove that XYes has proof or arbitrage betting or you don't care about the stuffs because things got too hot and too real and your tails suddenly tucked?
4. Point us to the things I made up both darwstall's and ziportans's thread.

Quote from: holydarkness on June 26, 2025, 10:23:55 PM

I'd like to add point 5 though: show me where in this thread that holy changing the rules saying that value betting was illegal.

Point 6: what disagreement is this that made a casino think the forum is not for them and leave for good just couple days after you "help with the case" because you "don't see eye to eye" with the casino?