Quote from: Wakate on July 22, 2025, 11:34:11 PM

Quote from: Ronsbit on July 22, 2025, 01:35:12 PM

Quote from: Wakate on July 21, 2025, 10:06:02 PM

Some service providers do charge up to 20% while some do charge lower depending on what could be available on the wallet. To me charging more than 20% is too much for a service retrieval to collect as fee. The fee can be stabled, not tagged to percentage of what could be on the wallet. If fee is determined by what is in the wallet, then there will be some retrieval services that will be earning close to $100k or more depending on what's available on the wallet address. This also might be lesser when fund in the wallet is below $1k.

It is okay to charge on percentage on what is available on the wallet but i will agree with you here that charging above 20% is way too high for the client to deal with irrespective of the fact that it is a recovery services. If the client did not seek their services, would they have had such opportunity to have such a percentage pay? In terms of a stable fee, that would be quite alright when not tagged to a particular percentage, it could be a fixed price based on standard and not too exorbitant to start with. All things being equal, the price for charges should be moderate and if it will be cool to say this that the possibility of having a price range would be alright based on what is in the wallet.

Eg;

Amount Range Fee(%)
$100 - $1000 10%
$1000 - $10,000 8%
$10,000 - $20,000 6%

Maybe something like the above example could be a good one to start with.

Your explanation is pretty cool since the interest rate is based on the value that is available in the wallet. Although I have seen some wallet retrieval services that collect a fee of 20% flat rate without negotiating on whether the amount on clients wallets can be huge or not.
I think crypto wallet retrieval services need to be flexible and relate with clients in a comprehensive way in case some might want to give their own rate which might still be adjustable. In a case when the wallet recovery procedures are simple and easy, slicing the price can attract more clients since service rate should not be fixed and less affordable.

Not disputing the fact that some service providers indeed charge really high but price compilation is a sure way to build trust for the clients
This estimation to me it's fair enough but what if one just needs a wallet back probably it was used for something in the past and currently does not have any holdings or probably less than a 100$ what would be a subsequent charge for such a service
I think however he the case it should be captured in the analysis