Quote from: m2017 on Today at 06:02:09 AM

Quote from: welovebit on August 15, 2025, 04:12:25 PM

Maybe my community will stand against me after this thread but still I want to ask from community what is point of merit source and if someone is having no time then why we have merit source like him in last 7 months just 7 posts and once came online is this ok or just waste of sources hopefully someone will give better update about this issue.

I agree with your opinion that a user who has received a merit source and is absent for a long time (or shows extremely low activity) should be deprived of this privilege of being a merit source. In the interests of the forum, another user who meets the requirements will be appointed to this position.

Quote from: Hazink on August 15, 2025, 04:31:28 PM

I have also searched, and I could not find anything in relation to inactive merit sources. As far as I know, they will continue to be merit sources until the admin decides to replace them or remove them entirely, just as he did last time when he approved more than 15 new merit sources and replaced old inactive ones. You just have to be patient until the admin has time for the merit source update.

I believe that instead of sitting and waiting, it is necessary to inform the administration about such cases. So that they are aware of the changes, because the administration has other tasks, therefore, these moments may be outside their field of vision. Addressing them will serve as a reminder.

To show, so to speak, your ~~civic~~ user position.

In the case of the user discussed above, how much longer should we wait if 7 months have passed? 7 years?

If I could remembered vividly those who were removed or demoted from merits source was a reason of being inactive, so what sense does it make of giving someone who is not active on forum a merit source? Knowing too well that they aren't active to do the free will task they assigned for. To me it would be best another user from Same local board applied as merits source then he should be removed and move to the active users since forum is not accommodating any form of inactiveness or holding positions without being active and even though it's a self willingness, there should be a form of dedication to the entire system to show the needs for accepting such positions. Therefore, I support your opinion to remove him to give active users who would be that willing to carry out the task correctly without being inactive anymore.