Quote from: FinneysTrueVision on August 23, 2025, 11:02:02 PM

Alex077

The results I got for this user were inconsistent due to them likely using a humanizer to methodically insert minor errors into their posts. It should be obvious to anybody who sees their profile that they are using AI to post in every sports thread to meet the high quota for their campaign. It’s unrealistic that anybody is organically interested in so many different leagues and sports.

Good catch. The account looks like it was purchased but it has been owned by a Russian since the beginning so its difficult to say for sure. Their post history is chock full of AI posts, however. Here's a few more.

Quote from: Alex077 on August 23, 2025, 06:19:01 PM

Yeah, Fundora looked like a monster against Tszyu — he used his reach perfectly and even in close exchanges he was the one dictating the pace. Tszyu just couldn’t figure him out, and that says a lot. If Fundora comes in with the same sharpness, I agree, Thurman’s in serious danger.
The biggest issue for Thurman is that inactivity. Three years without a real fight at the elite level is no joke, and ring rust is almost guaranteed. Add to that the fact he’s facing a tall, awkward, high-volume fighter like Fundora — it’s a nightmare matchup for someone making a comeback.

Unless Thurman can land something huge early and disrupt Fundora’s rhythm, I don’t see him winning this. Personally, I’m leaning the same way as you: Fundora by late KO or a wide unanimous decision. Thurman’s name is big, but his timing couldn’t be worse for this fight.

Sapling: 100% Fake
GPTZero: 100% AI generated

Quote from: Alex077 on August 22, 2025, 11:09:27 AM

As for the matchup, I respect Crawford for stepping up. Moving up in weight against someone like Canelo is no joke, and it shows Bud isn’t afraid of the risk. But styles make fights – Canelo’s power and size advantage are real factors here, while Crawford has speed, accuracy, and IQ on his side.
If it goes to the scorecards and it’s tight, history tells us judges tend to lean Canelo’s way. That’s why Crawford probably needs to win rounds very clearly or even go for a stoppage.

Sapling: 99% Fake
GPTZero: 95% AI generated

Quote from: Alex077 on August 21, 2025, 06:10:38 PM

Honestly, that Osasuna game wasn’t great from Madrid, but let’s be real — it’s only the first round. Mbappé missed a sitter, Vinícius tried, and yeah, without the penalty they probably drop points.
But people already crying that “Madrid is finished” are overreacting. Xabi Alonso just landed, give the man some time to settle in. You can’t expect peak chemistry in game one.
Barça smashing in their opener means nothing, it’s a marathon, not a sprint. Madrid’s squad is stacked, and once things click, they’ll be scary again.
Just my opinion, but I wouldn’t write Madrid off yet.

Sapling: 100% Fake
GPTZero: 100% AI generated

Quote from: Alex077 on August 21, 2025, 01:17:11 PM

I get your point — F1 has ,,always,, been about innovation, and sure, not every regulation or tech update was a success. Some things stuck, others were rolled back. That’s natural for a sport that evolves as fast as F1.

But honestly, I think what a lot of fans miss isn’t ,,just,, the noise. It’s the whole package — the rawness, the edge-of-your-seat unpredictability, and yes, the engine sound was a big part of that. Fake noise might technically be possible, but it won’t bring back the same feeling.
People loved F1 because it was an authentic mix of speed, danger, and pure racing spirit, not just a show. You can’t really fake that, even if technology allows you to. But hey, that’s just my personal opinion — some fans might feel differently, and that’s what keeps the debate alive.

Sapling: 100% Fake
GPTZero: 100% AI generated

Sapling and GPTZero see through the "humanization" but Copyleaks and ZeroGPT do not, interestingly enough.