Quote from: Lucius on Today at 01:03:26 PM

User : Joy- maker

Quote from: Joy- maker on August 22, 2025, 09:07:18 AM

First of all it makes no sense whereby the government of your country are now starting to impose Draconian measures to control any financial transactions or holdings, although the people who will be targeted are those guys transacting huge amount. but In this case I will say that since the government of your country are now starting to impose Draconian measures to control any financial transactions or holdings for me since a lot of people out there prefer privacy I think it will increase the use of p2p trading that are just between the two people who are carrying out the transaction, but kept away from exchanges and government control.

Quote from: Jet Cash on August 22, 2025, 08:54:46 AM

I'm in the UK, and our current government is intent on sucking money out of any savings or assets that we own. They are starting to impose Draconian measures to control any financial transactions or holdings. I believe that this could lead to an increase in the use of P2P transactions that are kept away from exchanges and government control. Do you believe that this will lead to an increase in transactions between members of fora such as Bitcoin Talk, or will such transactions be a rich grazing ground for government investigations?

It's not 100% plagiarism, but it's clearly paraphrasing where parts of the text are copied, obviously the user doesn't have time to write something original. I haven't checked his post history, but it's possible there's more.

Maybe @Hhampuz will be interested since it's in one of his sig campaigns.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5556289.msg65720686#msg65720686

topic=5556289.msg65720686#msg65720686
@Jet cash created a thread where he said "that his government are starting to impose Draconian measures to control any financial transactions or holdings".
So when I saw the thread I decided to reply him based on what he said and I replied that it makes no sense whereby his government are now starting to impose Draconian measures to control any financial transactions or holdings.
My reply was based on what he said and I only said it according to his writing so as not to miss things up especially since it was an information or news without a source.

And the second one was just a reply to the question he asked, I only gave him a direct answer based on what he said. Which is not exactly word to word, I wrote in order to use his idea to answer his question and I'm sure a lot of people also do that here.
I'm the second person to reply and I know people will see my reply I don't see my reply as plagiarism and I don't plagiarize.