Quote from: Agbamoni on August 23, 2025, 02:06:24 PM

Quote from: Justbillywitt on August 23, 2025, 01:47:35 PM

I don't really think that his definition of greed is totally wrong, I think you saying he's completely wrong is a bold statement as there are people who can see his definition and still Mark him good with his definition of greed. You know this thing call greed can be viewed differently by different scholars. That's why a wise man once said; where ones greed end's, that's where another man's greed starts. That's being said, greeds are in levels, he's right with his definition of greed, and you are also very much correct with your own definition as well.

What you are insinuating is that I am wrong and he is right. You should have come clean instead of beating around the bush.
Well, I wasn't trying to prove him completely wrong or right, I only wanted to make my obvious observations. And also make him to understand that people's views on things can differs. Many folks will accept his definition because that's what they do. While a lot of folks will agree with me because our view of greed is totally different.

You should at least take time to read through my post, I never in anyway said you were wrong. It was you that said the Op was wrong, and you gave further explanation to back your claims. I went through the op post and went through yous and I found out that neither your explanation nor the op own was wrong about the subject matter, of which I said that in my previous post. There was a place in your previous post were you said the Op was wrong with his definition of greed, but you now saying you weren't trying to prove him completely wrong or right is what I don't understand. Someone can either be wrong or right at a time. You can't turn around and want to sit on the fence, you have to make your position known, because I think you are the person now beating around the bush that you were accusing me of.