Quote from: rfcdejong on June 16, 2014, 11:20:16 AM

Quote from: bitspender on June 16, 2014, 10:53:36 AM

Quote from: sandor111 on June 16, 2014, 10:52:31 AM

Don't be selfish, it was agreed upon that we will relaunch the coin at block 16000. There is about 5k coins lost in my pool due to this.

It was agreed by those 2 forum members, the only two on this planet that can benefit from this.
Where is the official announcement from the dev about this?

I have no idea if it was just 2 forum members, there aren't many others posting on this forum.. but the network was crumbled and only the pool was finding blocks. slimcoin dev asked if more agreed to it, noone else gave feedback.

see post
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=613213.msg7325049#msg7325049

The problem is that there are only a handfull of people active in this thread, primer being one of them, but he should be a bit less negative Wink

I don't mind that much if it goes to block 16100 or 16200 because i kept 1 miner to the pool, because it was 32 bit anyway and else it wouldn't do much..

Block 16000 is just more fair to others, it will cost me around 300 SLIM as well.

I wasn't very active here but I also agreed to stop at 16000 though I let my miners running on the pool and I'm also loosing 200-300, and I'm not mad at anyone. Even primer was less negative than it used to be

.
The idea of this coin is a good one, the implementation wasn't so good and it was clear from the beginning. So anybody investing in this coin should know that it's a risky one.
More important now is to fix the wallet and "relaunch" or continue with the same blockchain. The developer probably doesn't have enough time to fix it. I'm also a developer and if I would have the time probably I would be able to rebuild the wallet form a stable codebase. Anyway I'm checking the options in the little free time I have.