Quote from: iCEBREAKER on August 23, 2014, 01:42:10 AM

Quote from: darlidada on August 22, 2014, 11:55:29 PM

Zoidberg, no offense you are a great coder but - and im sorry i've to be harsh - your autism is killing your own coin. You need to hire a team of people with vision about the future of bbr and who are able to create a community around it. Otherwise its gonna die and you'll be the sole responsible.

At the very list change the name. People started buying when there were talk about rebranding. Now there is nothing and every day we hit a new low.

I've proposed names already. "Rings" was liked by I know you dont like them but you have a strange sense of taste. Let the community come up with a name.

Boolberry is a cool name and a refreshing change from the usual *coin convention. There is no reason to change the quirky yet memorable name; the project will succeed or fail based on (market reaction to) its utility. Plus we already have a sweet logo!

The Benevolent Dictator For Life schema works for Linux, so BBR's pristine cathedral may turn out better than Monero's chaotic baazar.

It's far too early in the life of CryptoNote to declare winners and losers. Give it at least 6 months to a year before playing CZ's armchair psychologist.

Block rewards are decreasing every hour. These are the days of cheap and easy Boolberries we will look back on, and wish we'd bought more.

I don't think he falls for it Wink

Also some posters have publicly posted they consider this a "red flag project" and or have announced they have "dumped BBR", yet they keep passively trying to steer thoughts on what is needed for this coin or what somebody should think about this coin. I suggest we go past these charades please.

I agree that this is a good phase to collect cheap BBRs for those looking at CN. It can and should co-exist with XMR and should not be viewed as a threat.