Quote from: poornamelessme on August 29, 2014, 06:04:23 PM

Quote from: NULLthefuture on August 29, 2014, 05:47:44 PM

C-CEX is taking the required measures to guarantee everyone's investment. ICO will be held for three days after its over, and proper identification will be done by our entire team. What can we do to get members of this community to take a look at our plan? I am not asking everyone to get involved, but to offer constructive criticism.

I find it sort of interesting how people react to icos. So many people have been burned, be it from bittrex/polo/regular escrow or on c-cex, I guess they simply want a place to vent their anger. Some folks honestly may be just trying to warn others.

I don't view all icos as scams, but of course many are. I'll also add I have little interest in this coin and simply posted because I found the choice of 'null' as a name so bizarre. Same way as if you saw a headline that read 'Invalid -- Invest in the Future' ... my curiosity led me to read this thread.

As for constructive criticism, see if c-cex will agree to revise their ico rules so the team doesn't get all the funding immediately. Or see if polo will take the coin in conjunction with c-cex, as you can use their icd rules, and they will hold the funding until it is needed. That is the biggest risk of course ... devs get their money, then bail.

There are a number of red flags here, even overlooking the ICO stuff. The choice of the coin's name (you must have realized the meaning of the word Null, right?), the first page states that you won't do pod, then beneath it states you will (maybe update that), the whitepaper isn't out yet, mobile apps aren't available until after you are paid, and honestly, what is so special about the coin or plan? You don't need a whitepaper to outline why your coin is unique in some way, or why people should invest in it at all.

That's a lot of keystrokes to put my post in your own words, a simple +1 would have been easier/quicker.