Quote from: ilostmyface on October 03, 2014, 12:15:44 PM

Quote from: RedOakCoin on October 03, 2014, 03:08:50 AM

How would you and others feel about a Kimoto Gravity Well hard-fork?

I am for it! Look into newer coin's code if you plan to implement KGW, their are some known exploits with KGW. DarkGravityWave is another option.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=505243.20

Yes, I am familiar with some security issues, good call! This looks like the route that will benefit ROC the most!
Edit: I skimmed over the DarkGravityWell Source -> It looks promising. We may have to go with the DGW

Quote from: motorhead89 on October 06, 2014, 02:19:11 AM

If the developer fixed/changed the difficulty re-target issue with a hard fork.....then would that mean a hard fork would make current coins we hold invalid?? Huh

Do not worry -- All Coins Will Be Okay!:

We Keep Several Backups of the Blockchain in Cold-Storage
Handwritten Checkpoints Ready To Be Indexed
We Have A Functioning ROC-TestNet Network -> Will be used to test and analyze the KGW Hard-Fork
On TestNet we each have over several million ROC. We will ensure that no-coins are lost
I spoke with Dr. Kimoto several months back and was graciously helped out to ensure ROCs parameters best reflect the main goal and primary directive of RedOakCoin
If anyone is interested in helping out; We will post the TestNet-Testing Time's! It will be cool, I would like to show people how our Decay System actually works

Just wanted to thank everyone for keeping up with ROC even though we have hit a small difficulty bump.

--Aetheros
--Vulcan