Quote from: espringe on November 30, 2014, 08:03:38 PM

Quote from: luckybtccasino on November 30, 2014, 07:46:55 PM

espringe the words uneducated kid have not been used.

You're right, I paraphrased a little.

Quote

I am amazed at how much time you are willing to spend trying to provoke me with name calling ect

You're misreading the situation incredibly. I took the time to explain what's wrong with your scheme, and why it allows cheating. So you didn't think I was full of hot-air, I even offered you a 100 BTC wager using the exact scheme you do. You continue to argue your scheme is provably fair, but refuse to take my wager -- which leaves me with the inescapable conclusion that you know it's not really provably fair and wish to leave it that way.

And more offensively than any name calling, you just provide a link to a thread on provably fair and act like I don't understand it.

Quote

The most valuable thing to me is time, this may not be the case for you. But for this reason I will not be responding to your post in less you have anything of value to say which some of your posts do but most do not.

You probably have a point there. I guess someone pointing out your dishonestly contributes no value to you.

Give me an example of how he could cheat. The man told you the formula. Explain how he can use the formula that he gave to cheat in a card game.

Quote from: espringe on November 30, 2014, 08:10:12 PM

Quote from: luckybtccasino on November 30, 2014, 07:56:44 PM

Please check the site and Provably fair system before you make your decision.

and also see where he refuses to eat his own dog food. I have repeatedly offered to play him in a game of heads or tails, using his own provably fair scheme, with fully escrowed funds. If he wins, I'll give him 100 BTC. If he loses, he only has to pay 10 BTC.

He allows people to attempt to win 180 (?) BTC on his site in a single bet, at a tiny house edge. But refuses to play against me, with insanely advantageous odds. I'd honestly like to give him the benefit of the doubt, and assume he's incompetent rather than dishonest, but it increasingly seems unlikely.

A champion does not accept the challenge of all challengers. A challenger must climb a ladder to challenge the champion. Same thing here ... if every newbie from a forum would doubt a system just because they can, it would mean to waste 9999999 hours to reply to each and one of them and they will still doubt the system. In this case, espringe, you are doing it out of pure evil. The man game you the formula and it is clear that he cannot cheat if the player can set a client seed AFTER the deck was hashed and sent to the player and if he told you how he uses the client seed to influence the initial deck.

Quote from: espringe on November 30, 2014, 07:09:11 PM

Quote from: elm on November 30, 2014, 04:31:43 PM

but I dont understand why You want to teach/help someone who doesnt want to learn and accept Your opinion? isnt it a waste of time?

If you look at my first post, I was genuinely trying to help him out -- but instead he replied with nonsense and rudeness. A more level headed person than my self, would walk away -- but instead I've decided to prove a point. The guy keeps calling me an uneducated kid, and yet with minimal effort I've been able to play +EV and successfully cash out over a bitcoin in net profit so far.

If anyone's interested and willing, PM me and I'll tell you one way to play his casino with an EV of +61.749% [1]

[1] I can't guarantee that number, as it's based on the games being fair. If he's undetectably cheating, the EV is around -70% (we can't tell as the games aren't provably fair). If he's overtly cheating, the EV is -100%. If he's not cheating, the EV should be 61.749%. I can't tell what he's doing, but so far he's honored all cash outs and I've netted a reasonable profit.

So I can make a profit of 61.749% from his games? That means he has an RTP of 161.749%. Teach me master how you do it (PM ME).