Quote from: JustAnotherBitcoinFan on December 01, 2014, 05:44:51 PM

Quote from: Bitcoins101 on December 01, 2014, 05:35:08 PM

Quote from: JustAnotherBitcoinFan on December 01, 2014, 05:22:22 PM

Quote from: Tomatocage on December 01, 2014, 03:38:14 PM

JustAnotherBitcoinFan, I'm curious why you left me negative feedback? Do you have reason to believe that I've scammed somebody as indicated in your comment, or did you leave me negative feedback purely out of retaliation? If the latter, that's blatant abuse of the Trust system. The reason I left you negative feedback is because your account went dark a year and a half ago and now it has suddenly come back online selling BTC. Prior to your resurrection you had never set foot in Currency Exchange. If you can demonstrate ownership of the 36+ BTC that you claim to have, or use a trusted escrow (not me, because this would clearly be a conflict of interest), I'll remove the negative feedback. However, I strongly suspect you'll do neither.

As stated before I left you negative feedback cause you fit a trend of what some escrow scammers have done and try to do to scam people. It's my right apparently to leave you negative feedback if I feel you could merely be at risk of scamming people...right? I have also asked about 30 other members who have stayed active here since the last time I was here (their post as well as trust is pretty high now a days) to check you out as well and leave feedback if they feel your scamming people as well. I have fought business's who tried to screw bitcoin users and you will be no different to me. (see bitinstant as example)

It's your right, but that doesn't mean you're right. Do you think TomatoCage would have a good reputation if he scammed people?

Sending unsolicited PMs is actually against the rules.

A screenshot doesn't prove much.

It is obviously right to leave bad feedback to people you only suspect...tomato does it all the time. He has been wrong a great many times about people too. If you go out and arrest 30 people nearby a bank robbery...1 might end up being the robber but you locked away 29 innocents in the process. He don't care about the innocents ones he screws cause either way it goes good for him.

The issue is, for every 30 guys making a post like this, there may be 29 scammers and 1 guy who is legitimately trying to trade. Do you kind of see where he is coming from, now? I'm sure he'll remove the negative trust after he sees that you've completed a transaction with a real member, have funded an escrow address, or have signed an address containing the coins.