Quote from: segvec on December 06, 2014, 02:43:12 AM

Quote from: ACCTseller on December 06, 2014, 02:03:35 AM

Quote from: segvec on December 06, 2014, 01:28:38 AM

Seen that coming from 5 miles away.

What exactly did you "see coming"?

Does the OP want to offer any proof of his claims? The burden of proof is on the accuser. I can say that the majority of his claims are not true.

Account is hacked.
That alone is enough proof.

Right......"hacked"

Quote from: BadBear on August 16, 2014, 02:59:03 PM

This is a perfect example of why I don't want to restore accounts (for the most part). While bayuo obviously did control the Zedicus account at one point, and is probably the original owner, there appears to be a pretty good reason he doesn't anymore (I won't elaborate for privacy reasons). Though there really is no way to be positive either way.

Exemplifies perfectly what I was saying the other day about signing addresses not being conclusive proof that the person signing *should* be in control of that account.

Quote from: pissedoff on August 16, 2014, 02:02:55 PM

Can we get any conformation from staff if they check ip logs in case of hacked accounts.

Yes, but it isn't conclusive proof anymore than signing an address is, just a piece of evidence.