Quote from: Jake Humphrey on December 10, 2014, 09:51:58 PM

Quote from: Hanover on December 10, 2014, 07:29:12 PM

Quote from: comerciante on December 10, 2014, 06:39:27 PM

Quote from: Ozymandias The Third on December 10, 2014, 04:44:22 PM

Good ideas so far. Of course whether this will later be implented depends on the limits of the ICG team as they are already busy with their current tasks. Although I'm sure that they will focus on these concepts later.

There was already an earlier post of the possibility that the ICG team would be split into two sections. One could focus on wallet improvements while the other tries to add services through the ICG network.

I think that wallet features will have a higher priority at first and later expand into network services. It's too early to say exactly how future development will work with Incognito coin.

It wouldn't necessarily need to run on the ICG network directly. A separate app using ICG for transactions would suffice while still providing the same services across multiple platforms.

If that's the case then it should likely be easier to implement as adding a network protocol with ICG would likely be time-consuming. A separate application will allow faster production and possibly more features. The app could even incorporate a QR scanner for use at Generalbytes ATMs to withdrawal and deposit Incognito coins.