Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 20 results by 0x00usa
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
I think you cannot do it that way. You should fork the original code and then push your changes in order to respect the user's contribution and the license.
https://github.com/Dookoo2/Cyclone/blob/main/LICENSE
@nomachine Yeah, your copy of that repo really needs to have a copy of the original license (with copyright/attribution) in order to be compliant with the licensing agreement... Easy to forget when you're only dealing with a portion of the original code (looks like just the AVX2 folder, and the license file is at the root), but still necessary...
Of course. Here you go.
https://github.com/NoMachine1/Cyclone
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
Thank you very much for this as well - that's enough 
Here is the Git repository from my folder:
https://github.com/NoMachine1/Cyclone.git
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
1MVD14nafRFEHGSYgbup1GeF8wtYcmHpvZ - DB09BA36C67BDAC17
1MVDYgVaSN6iKKEsbzRUAYFrYJadLYZvvZ - Target
Probability. 1MVDYgVaSN6iKKEsbzRUAYFrYJadLYZvvZ - Target
Please explain. Write me a private message. ad4c09cf1bc9e47a0 1MVDYgVaU5BkYUCBLCkrec5jAW1pP7MfvZ
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
<<<cut>>
Look, this long answer really confuses you and shows that you are trying to show different results correctly.
How can you say that scanning the entire range with the work I did will take the same time?
I will ask you a question that you will answer very briefly.
You have 10m/key power.
ABC1234567890 - ABC9875643210
to find a wallet between these 2 hexes.
The result of the calculations;
ABC31-ABC32
ABC45-ABC47
ABC58-ABC60
ABC6B-ABC6D
ABC7F-ABC83
ABC90-ABC91
1- Scanning these ranges takes less time? (Even if you know the probability of skipping the wallet.)
2- Or the entire range or the random search result?
Give a very short answer, which one would you approve? 1 or 2?
Don't confuse people by writing long sentences.
Edit;
By the way, I don't think Bram will spend that much money again. Because his team has problems, I guess.
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
<<<cut>>
Look, this long answer really confuses you and shows that you are trying to show different results correctly.
How can you say that scanning the entire range with the work I did will take the same time?
I will ask you a question that you will answer very briefly.
You have 10m/key power.
ABC1234567890 - ABC9875643210
to find a wallet between these 2 hexes.
The result of the calculations;
ABC31-ABC32
ABC45-ABC47
ABC58-ABC60
ABC6B-ABC6D
ABC7F-ABC83
ABC90-ABC91
1- Scanning these ranges takes less time? (Even if you know the probability of skipping the wallet.)
2- Or the entire range or the random search result?
Give a very short answer, which one would you approve? 1 or 2?
Don't confuse people by writing long sentences.
Edit;
By the way, I don't think Bram will spend that much money again. Because his team has problems, I guess.
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
[цитата автора=bibilgin ссылка=topic=1306983.msg65153710#msg65153710 дата=1741632628][цитата автора=0x00usa ссылка=topic=1306983.msg65153689#msg65153689 дата=1741632322]Спасибо г-ну Бибилгину [/цитата]Добро пожаловать, удачи.[/цитата] Mr. Bibilgin write me telegram please @zb1hQ
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
As I wrote before,
I will give a reward when I win the reward for exchanging the prefixes 1MVDYgVaSN and 1MVDYgVaSN6 or for information.
I wish everyone good luck and a good life.
I couldn't send you a private message. Send me a telegram or mail please, I'll give you the SN.I will give a reward when I win the reward for exchanging the prefixes 1MVDYgVaSN and 1MVDYgVaSN6 or for information.
I wish everyone good luck and a good life.
On your own profile, in the personal message options, check Allow beginners to send you private messages (PM).
Then try PM again or let me know and I will PM you.
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
As I wrote before,
I will give a reward when I win the reward for exchanging the prefixes 1MVDYgVaSN and 1MVDYgVaSN6 or for information.
I wish everyone good luck and a good life.
I couldn't send you a private message. Send me a telegram or mail please, I'll give you the SN.I will give a reward when I win the reward for exchanging the prefixes 1MVDYgVaSN and 1MVDYgVaSN6 or for information.
I wish everyone good luck and a good life.
On your own profile, in the personal message options, check Allow beginners to send you private messages (PM).
Then try PM again or let me know and I will PM you.
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
As I wrote before,
I will give a reward when I win the reward for exchanging the prefixes 1MVDYgVaSN and 1MVDYgVaSN6 or for information.
I wish everyone good luck and a good life.
I couldn't send you a private message. Send me a telegram or mail please, I'll give you the SN.I will give a reward when I win the reward for exchanging the prefixes 1MVDYgVaSN and 1MVDYgVaSN6 or for information.
I wish everyone good luck and a good life.
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
Thank you. You wrote above C0 now everyone is looking above. But still thanks for the answer.
Here is another good information for you, it remains under E2. 68th wallet
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
This is commendable of course. In your opinion, where is 68 in what range? And you can publish several 1MVDYgVaSN.
Unfortunately, my friend, I do not want to share this information.
Or rather, I want to share what I have with people who give me another prefix in return.
I can only give a little information about the 68th wallet range. It is located above C0.
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
I already told him he wasted his time, energy & electricity. I think he finally got a reality check now 😂
I never got answer to this question @ bibilgin & Mcdouglasx after reading your comments i believe you guys are expert in this so can please explain how come probability come into this if there's no connection in any shape or form?
It's called coincidence and not a probability
It's called coincidence and not a probability
After writing the first article, I don't understand how you wrote the second article?
First of all, let me say this, KTimesG said there were 2 of us.
But for the last 2-3 days, I have been receiving questions and messages from many people in my mailbox. This proves that there are people who respect or believe in my work.
Now, I have actually proven your question many times before.
1- I have repeatedly stated the range of the 67th wallet = between 6D and 77
2- I gave 1 example of a decimal value difference. =
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1306983.msg64873290#msg64873290
3- I proved what KtimesG said was impossible or didn't believe.
4- Let me even prove it. Now, do a range scan. Determine the range yourself.
Send me the wallets that come up in that range. I will tell you where the wallet with the prefix 1MVDYgVaSN is on AVERAGE PROBABILITY. After proving this, I hope you will be convinced.
I will not do more because.
Another topic;
KTimesG - As its name says, it has spent years reading, archiving and gaining knowledge on K, N and G. It has acquired serious information on creating EC, Kangaroo, mixed and BTC wallets.
In fact, the reason for its research was to search for a clue, a vulnerability in the system. It spent years on this subject, but could not find any vulnerability.
My work is on the calculation of the COMPOSITE PROBABILITY of encryption systems. The result tells me in which direction I am really looking for.
About 6 hours ago, I found the 19th 1MVDYgVaSN prefix. Has anyone been able to find 19 1MVDYgVaSN prefixes in this amount of time with the power of my hardware? I also have 1 prefix, 1MVDYgVaSN6. (2 pieces as given by Zahid888.)
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
If someone can solve bit 100 quickly with kangaroo, they can solve 135 in record time using a little ingenuity.
So you went from prob. stat. 90% reduction achievements straight to breaking the DLP sqrt(N) bound theorem, which is proven for 40 years?
The public keys are nothing more than labels, unless one actually breaks the EC math itself. In a N-bit set / interval / whatever, there are 2**N colors. Or 2**N emojis. Or 2**N fruits. Using any kind of binary logic on their index / value / counter has exactly zero relevance, because it is totally relative and can always be rebased to some other base value. This is like saying you have telepathic capacities and can read someone's mind when they think of a color / emoji / fruit.
And it would be a stupid idea to solve 135 using a 100-bit solver, it just increases the complexity terribly, no matter how you approach the problem (splitting to 2**35 100-bit solve steps, introducing statistical non-sense, mixing unicorn algorithms, etc.). Because it would defy the laws of nature to find something that goes below sqrt(N) (on long-term average, not on a lucky hit exception).
Your brain, with all due respect, does not allow for intuitive solutions. That is why some of us believe your responses are based on AI. Without knowing what I'm referring to, you complain and attack. You assume too much without understanding what I'm talking about.
That's why Bibilgin humiliated you, you assured that he didn't have the key and he slapped you. You don't give anyone the benefit of the doubt, that's being arrogant, and the most ignorant person is always the one who thinks they know everything.
Next time you want to refute something, at least ask what I mean because I made an assertion but not the how. That way you don't reveal your frustration and need to stand out; you only make yourself look ridiculous. How can someone who considers themselves moderately intelligent refute an idea they don't know? It's like if I said that your ultra-fast Kangaroo code that you promised is impossible, I would never say that because I haven't seen it, nor do I know what your futuristic Kangaroo does to jump to a conclusion.
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
Finally, 3 attempts later (after getting step by step guides, scripts, and pictures) of what was being asked.
So yeah, I guess I can now apologize for thinking you don't have the private key to that address.
I also guess you could have done this way earlier instead of engaging in e totally useless emotional roller-coaster. But I forgive you - you had no idea how to generate the hash, or of what to generate it. Or even why I asked it, lol. It's ok, bib.
But since you needed like several people to help you understand something so basic, it shows your extensive skills in hash functions, and more generally in how Bitcoin works. I mean, for the love of God, I fear you fail to understand what exactly you are searching in these puzzles, and why. You are just using some tools made by other people, without even knowing how they work.
So yeah, I guess I can now apologize for thinking you don't have the private key to that address.
I also guess you could have done this way earlier instead of engaging in e totally useless emotional roller-coaster. But I forgive you - you had no idea how to generate the hash, or of what to generate it. Or even why I asked it, lol. It's ok, bib.
But since you needed like several people to help you understand something so basic, it shows your extensive skills in hash functions, and more generally in how Bitcoin works. I mean, for the love of God, I fear you fail to understand what exactly you are searching in these puzzles, and why. You are just using some tools made by other people, without even knowing how they work.
Apology accepted. (You don't seem to like apologizing.
)My friend, the problem here is that since my English is weak, I didn't understand why you wanted the sha256 converted version of the public key. lol
As I said, I know the hashing process.
My work is on hex and decimal.
I can calculate the AVERAGE PROBABILITY of which hex range the wallets are in with their prefixes.
For example; I found the 18th 1MVDYgVaSN prefix 45 minutes ago.
It would take months or years to scan all the ranges with my hardware.
That's why I'm focusing on the 1MVDYgVaSN prefixes. After it comes out in the range I calculated, I move on to the next one. To save time.
I already told him he wasted his time, energy & electricity. I think he finally got a reality check now 😂
As I wrote above, as a result of misunderstanding (because of my bad English)
KTimesG wanted - Sha256.Publickey
What I understood - Public Key, Sha256 converted version.
Also, I said it before. I don't have any costs, the hardware works in the office I work in. The company accepting the work and calculations I do = cost-free work.