Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 2,357 results by Alone055
Re: [OPEN] bet105.ag | Global Crypto Sportsbook | Signature campaign | Sr. Member+
Bitcointalk Username: Alone055
BTC Address (should be SegWit): bc1qj2d86v0hcx3myszrlmckpusmmtapm5sz6yr69e
BTC Address (should be SegWit): bc1qj2d86v0hcx3myszrlmckpusmmtapm5sz6yr69e
Reapplying for the slots that are left open by @shashan and @Hyphen(-)
Am I the only that can't open the spreadsheet link? It points to a sign-in window. I would like to check it without a gmail account.
No, the manager has changed its settings so that not everyone can see it. Only those whose emails are added will be able to see the spreadsheet.
Re: Is Saint-loup cheating LiveCasino.io signature campaign? What do you think?
By the way, If you do these is because the threshold signature campaign 25 post/weeks are hard for you. The decision is on you too, you can leave the campaign and joined a campaign with paid-per-post without threshold post to be paid. You have a free time to post anytime you want, and you still getting paid what you post without any pressure at all from the minimum post to be qualified you getting paid.
The campaign in question doesn't have and never had a minimum post threshold:
3. There is no minimum number of posts that need to be written. We will pay up to 25 posts per week. Cut-off time is Sunday at 7 PM forum time.
Also cleared by @Trofo here:
We don't even have minimum post requirements in our campaign. 5 good posts per week would be fine by us but that means just 20$ payment instead of 100$.
Even though this topic has been discussed a zillion times, I'll offer my two cents on the subject anyway.
The majority of people who invest money that isn't extra for them, which means that they either take loans, sell some property, or invest their life savings into Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, because they've the impression that they are going to get guaranteed profit. When we talk about Bitcoin and see its history, we see that what they think isn't wholly wrong because those who had invested in Bitcoin, most of them, had been, at some point, in profit. However, there is another aspect to this. You might be able to get some profit when you invest in Bitcoin, but there is no guarantee about when that's going to happen. So, if someone invests money that they can't have locked for an unspecified amount of time, they can face problems.
Thus, it's important for anyone, whether a new investor or not (mostly only new investors do such things), to understand everything before they make a decision. The money one invests in this space shouldn't be needed, both in the present and in the near future, because the amount of time it's going to take for it to turn profitable is unknown, and this market is highly unpredictable.
The majority of people who invest money that isn't extra for them, which means that they either take loans, sell some property, or invest their life savings into Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, because they've the impression that they are going to get guaranteed profit. When we talk about Bitcoin and see its history, we see that what they think isn't wholly wrong because those who had invested in Bitcoin, most of them, had been, at some point, in profit. However, there is another aspect to this. You might be able to get some profit when you invest in Bitcoin, but there is no guarantee about when that's going to happen. So, if someone invests money that they can't have locked for an unspecified amount of time, they can face problems.
Thus, it's important for anyone, whether a new investor or not (mostly only new investors do such things), to understand everything before they make a decision. The money one invests in this space shouldn't be needed, both in the present and in the near future, because the amount of time it's going to take for it to turn profitable is unknown, and this market is highly unpredictable.
Re: 🎰 Dragon Slots Casino | Round 4 USDT Sig-Campaign | Promo Code: BITCOINTALK 🐉
Reserved
Re: [OPEN] bet105.ag | Global Crypto Sportsbook | Signature campaign | Sr. Member+
@Upgrade00, nothing major, but I noticed a small mistake in the spreadsheet. The line where it says "Sr/Hero/Legendary: $60 per post", it should actually be "$60 per week". 
Just wanted to point that out.
Just wanted to point that out.
Anyway waisy ik Baat Kisi ny note ki ha abhi duniya Israel boycott ko thoora serious ly rahy ty aur especially Pakistan Mai but jo hi yeh India Pakistan ka scene start hogaya Palestine ko sab Bhool gai toh ap nahi smajaty kafi na kafi Israel ny duniya ki nazry apny ap Sy hatany ky Liya India ky through yeh drama rachaya
as abhi woh mukamal gaza ko hamwaar Karny ky mission pa ha so zyada duniya ka un par focused hona unky Liya tek nahi toh yeh scene start Kiya ap Kya samajty ha aisa Kuch ha ya just mujy lag raha ha
as abhi woh mukamal gaza ko hamwaar Karny ky mission pa ha so zyada duniya ka un par focused hona unky Liya tek nahi toh yeh scene start Kiya ap Kya samajty ha aisa Kuch ha ya just mujy lag raha ha
Mere bhai aaj kal dunya men ziada tar jitne bhi hamle hote hain khas kr tab jab wo begunah awaam ko marne k liye ki jati hain unke peeche koi na koi political agenda hota hi hai qk sochne wali baat hai k kisi bhi adaare ko ya kisi bhi liberation army ko begunaah logon ko maarne se kuch nahin milega aur wo yeh cheez karte bhi nahin hain bhale jitni zalim party ho bhale apni azaadi ki jang larh rhe hon ya koi mulki dushmani ho, jab bhi is tarha k hamle hote hain aur aam logon ko maara jata hai, uske peeche koi political chaal hoti hai.
Lehaza, yeh jo hamla hua hai ismen koi na koi chaal toh zaror hai, ab is hamle se kisko kia mafad mile hain wo toh hum yaqeeni tor par nahin keh skte lekin yeh baat toh wazeh hai k yeh koi aesa hamla nahin hai jismen muslmanon ne ya kashmiri liberals ne hinduon ko mara hai qk wo agar maarna chahte toh forces ko maarte na k begunah awaam ko.
Jo samajhdar log hain wo is cheez ko samajhte hain, baqi India ki jo awaam hai wo intehai bewakoof hai qk unko lagta hai yeh Pakistan ne kiya hai jb k yeh ho b skta hai lekin ismen koi logic wali baat nai hai qk Pakistan ka ismen koi khas faida nai hai.
While I'm typing this post, there's a Subject: field above it. That's the Subject of my post. If anything, you should wonder why most people don't use it, and why there's a default filled in already. I know the answer: it's quite convenient to leave it as is. But if I create a new post Subject, and you quote my post, you'll get the same Subject again (unless you change it).
It's a feature, not a bug.
It's a feature, not a bug.
Okay, makes sense, but then, isn't it better for posters to essentially stick to the same subject selected by the OP instead of changing it for each post? That's basically why most people don't change it, but if someone wants, they can abuse this feature just like how the guy I mentioned did.
I understood what you suggested initially and we may disagree, that's totally fine. I simply oppose your suggestion that the Subject of a topic should remain unchangeable for anybody else except the OP. You asked for opinions, you got mine. We don't need to find consensus.
Agreed, we're just discussing, no one needs to agree with each other in everything being said or proposed, and that's totally fine.
Let me add another thought regarding consequences of your suggestion:
If the OP is the only one to define the Subject for the whole thread, I would assume that the Subject should change for every post in a topic when the OP updates the topic's Subject, no? (Of course, the Subject for any other poster could remain unchanged but does this makes sense when you allow the OP to update the Subject and nobody else can change the Subject?)
If the OP is the only one to define the Subject for the whole thread, I would assume that the Subject should change for every post in a topic when the OP updates the topic's Subject, no? (Of course, the Subject for any other poster could remain unchanged but does this makes sense when you allow the OP to update the Subject and nobody else can change the Subject?)
That's how I believe it should be. If a topic is created, it should be discussed with the given title, and everyone should have the same subject when they are making their posts. Only because you are responding to someone else within a thread, you don't need to specifically change the subject line for it. As long as you are and the person you are responding to are on-topic, it shouldn't be a problem, imo.
Now think about the following potential of abuse:
An OP posts a topic with some agreeable or interesting Subject. Other users chime in and post: Yay, I like your topic... totally agree... whatever...
Later the fictional malicious OP changes Subject to something really nasty and/or offensive and above assumed update mechanics is imprinted on any poster of the topic/thread. I definitely wouldn't want this.
An OP posts a topic with some agreeable or interesting Subject. Other users chime in and post: Yay, I like your topic... totally agree... whatever...
Later the fictional malicious OP changes Subject to something really nasty and/or offensive and above assumed update mechanics is imprinted on any poster of the topic/thread. I definitely wouldn't want this.
A good poster/user wouldn't do that, and if someone does, which is usually very rare because in all the years I've spent in this forum, I've not seen that happening much, but, even if someone does abuse it, we can report the thread to the mods and they will take care of it.
Your change of Subject here is only visible in your post, not in the topic listing of Meta.
P.S. Had to edit the Subject when I quoted you, because my quote reply inherited your change of Subject and I overlooked it first.
I don't like your proposal, as I sometimes "fix" the Subject deliberately when the OP has chosen a really bad Subject or I want to add an additional emphasis. I rarely do this, though.
The idiot who applied to a lot of signature campaigns by trying to fake them as [OPEN] is just plain stupid and earned his spot on every campaign manager's blacklist.
Frankly, I don't really see a point to disallow a change of the Subject by any poster when this change is limited to the user's own post, unless he's quoted and the quoter keeps the change. This doesn't update the Subject of the topic in the topics listing, this can only do the OP or moderators/admins.
P.S. Had to edit the Subject when I quoted you, because my quote reply inherited your change of Subject and I overlooked it first.
I don't like your proposal, as I sometimes "fix" the Subject deliberately when the OP has chosen a really bad Subject or I want to add an additional emphasis. I rarely do this, though.
The idiot who applied to a lot of signature campaigns by trying to fake them as [OPEN] is just plain stupid and earned his spot on every campaign manager's blacklist.
Frankly, I don't really see a point to disallow a change of the Subject by any poster when this change is limited to the user's own post, unless he's quoted and the quoter keeps the change. This doesn't update the Subject of the topic in the topics listing, this can only do the OP or moderators/admins.
Bro, I know that this doesn't change the title of the thread as a whole, and my suggestion wasn't about that. I suggested that no user other than the OP should be allowed to make any changes in the subject, even in their own post, because they are posting in someone else's thread, and they shouldn't have the right to make that change. The area that says "Re: Little things that bug you/me about the forum" is to show us the title of the thread we are in, and the thread is created by someone, so why should I be allowed to choose a different subject line for the same thread only in my post when that area is specifically to show the title and has nothing to do with my post at all since my post is show in the body?
You, or anyone, might not like it, but I don't think it should be allowed. If you are posting in a thread, you should only be allowed to post, you shouldn't be allowed to make your post have a different subject than the one OP has chosen. If someone doesn't like a title, they can write about it in their post and ask the OP to change it.
Re: Little things that bug you/me about the forum (By: PowerGlove)
⭐ Merited by Halab (2)
Hi @PowerGlove.
I have a suggestion. I don't know if this has been suggested before or not, but I'm still going to go ahead and suggest it. If you and others feel it's good, it should be implemented.
So, I recently created a thread in the Reputation board about a user who had applied in almost every single signature campaign in the Services section, even when they were all either CFNP or PAUSED. However, that's not the point here; the point is that the user who did that was actually changing the titles of most of the threads where he was applying by changing "[CFNP]" to "[OPEN]" to make his applications valid.
Similarly, right now, when I'm writing this post, I'm also adding some extra text "(By: PowerGlove)", in the Subject of this thread that you can see when I post this.
Now, I wonder why a poster is allowed to make changes in the Subject of a thread? I mean, if I have created a thread and chose a subject line for it, it should be only be who should be allowed to change that if I ever want to and not those who are going to post in my thread.
So, my suggestion is that when a poster is about to post something in a thread, or if they want to modify a post, the textbox in front of the "Subject:" should be closed for them, so that they don't get to make any changes in the subject when they are making a post. That textbox should only be available for the creator of the thread so that if the creator wants to make a change in it, they should be able to do it, but posters shouldn't be allowed to do that.
That's it. Let me know what you guys think.
I have a suggestion. I don't know if this has been suggested before or not, but I'm still going to go ahead and suggest it. If you and others feel it's good, it should be implemented.
So, I recently created a thread in the Reputation board about a user who had applied in almost every single signature campaign in the Services section, even when they were all either CFNP or PAUSED. However, that's not the point here; the point is that the user who did that was actually changing the titles of most of the threads where he was applying by changing "[CFNP]" to "[OPEN]" to make his applications valid.
Similarly, right now, when I'm writing this post, I'm also adding some extra text "(By: PowerGlove)", in the Subject of this thread that you can see when I post this.
Now, I wonder why a poster is allowed to make changes in the Subject of a thread? I mean, if I have created a thread and chose a subject line for it, it should be only be who should be allowed to change that if I ever want to and not those who are going to post in my thread.
So, my suggestion is that when a poster is about to post something in a thread, or if they want to modify a post, the textbox in front of the "Subject:" should be closed for them, so that they don't get to make any changes in the subject when they are making a post. That textbox should only be available for the creator of the thread so that if the creator wants to make a change in it, they should be able to do it, but posters shouldn't be allowed to do that.
That's it. Let me know what you guys think.
Should it be that all the campaigns that were applied for had open slots, I wouldn’t find that unusual although, desperation could be a better term to tag it but, nothing unusual about that. Just a user looking for slots where ever there is one.
I wouldn't have created a thread or called that unusual behaviour if the campaigns had open slots. If you had read this whole thread, you would find the answer in @The Cryptovator's post where he explained how he changed the titles of the threads to "[OPEN]" himself when submitting his applications.
Also, being a hero member, it’s also possible that all of them open campaigns would have slots for hero members so, that too can go.
I don't know if you didn't read the OP or what, but it clearly says and shows (in the screenshot) that the campaigns he applied for were all either CFNP or PAUSED.
When I was updating my 2-factor authentication I noticed something - It's very possible that account sellers are now using 2FA to trade accounts. There's no recording of 2FA changes, so if a member logs in with the same password as the last owner, and changes the 2auth, that is potentially a way to trade accounts now. I already asked Vod if it was possible to record that data on bpip, as that could share a lot of light on if the theory is true.
As for the member, it does seem desperate, though I don't think it's unusual. If someone wants to get into a campaign it only makes sense to apply for all that's available. Applying for CFNP campaigns though just shows that they not only do not know how the forum works, and has made no effort to read before they start applying.
As for the member, it does seem desperate, though I don't think it's unusual. If someone wants to get into a campaign it only makes sense to apply for all that's available. Applying for CFNP campaigns though just shows that they not only do not know how the forum works, and has made no effort to read before they start applying.
I also had the thought that the account might have changed hands and is being controlled by a new owner after changing or possibly enabling 2FA without changing the password or email, since we don't get to know if an account had a change in 2FA or when it was enabled/disabled. However, this is only possible if someone gives the access of the account to someone himself, either through a deal or just to use it, because if someone hacks an account and enable 2FA without changing the email, the original owner can reset it using the email attached as far as I know, unless the original owner didn't have a valid email address attached to the account which is a very big security flaw from his side.
Re: Why it is sometimes possible to take out a bank loan to buy BTC
Some of you talk about bitcoin as a high-risk investment, when in fact you've probably invested in bitcoin yourself (otherwise you probably wouldn't be on this forum). High-risk perhaps, but over time it was less high-risk than a simple savings account whose interest failed to keep up with inflation.
Many people borrow to buy a car, but for me a car is not an asset but a liability. Except perhaps a classic car. Sometimes it's better to lease a car than to buy one, depending on your needs. But in any case, a car is a liability, depreciating over time and costing a lot to maintain.
I'd rather invest in btc than in a car, for example.
Many people borrow to buy a car, but for me a car is not an asset but a liability. Except perhaps a classic car. Sometimes it's better to lease a car than to buy one, depending on your needs. But in any case, a car is a liability, depreciating over time and costing a lot to maintain.
I'd rather invest in btc than in a car, for example.
Just because all or most of us have invested in Bitcoin doesn't mean it's not a risky investment asset. We understand that Bitcoin is rewarding in the long run, but let's not forget that reward comes with risk, and even if someone doesn't lose their money unless they buy high and sell low, but the fact that Bitcoin's price depreciates as well due to its volatile nature doesn't make it a suitable option for taking a loan and investing in it because you need to repay the loan within a specified time while you don't know how long Bitcoin's price will take to make you profitable once it goes down from where you've bought.
So, my friend, even though you are right that it's a good investment and those who have funds that they own and know aren't needed now or won't be needed in the near future should invest in it, but it is absolutely not recommended to take a loan and invest in Bitcoin because the market is unpredictable and you never know what might happen next. The only exception could be if a person has a stable and high-paying income source which can help them repay the loan over time.
Re: AI Spam Report Reference Thread
⭐ Merited by JayJuanGee (1)
Yes, the whole problem lies with the punctuation in English grammar. I used Google to get good grammatical formatting, which makes it look like it was written by AI.
This is a problem because most members here are not native English speakers, and therefore a large portion of them use grammar checking tools or automatic text formatting. This is unfair. AI detection tools should be smart enough to detect the content of the text, not the formatting. Do you get the idea?
This is a problem because most members here are not native English speakers, and therefore a large portion of them use grammar checking tools or automatic text formatting. This is unfair. AI detection tools should be smart enough to detect the content of the text, not the formatting. Do you get the idea?
I disagree with your reasoning. A post that has been refined using a tool that corrects grammatical or punctuation errors isn't detected as AI-written by the tools, and I say this because I use Grammarly myself for the same purpose, it helps me detect and correct the mistakes that I make in my writing, and you can go ahead and check some of my posts using the tools and you will see that they won't be detected as AI-written texts.
The problem doesn't only lie in punctuation but also in the writing style and formatting, etc. If you write a text yourself, but then use a tool to correct punctuations or other small mistakes, it doesn't change the writing format or style unless you make it do so, and that's why, you can't say that using tools or even Google to have correct punctuation and grammar makes your texts detected as AI-written.
That being said, it's really unnecessary to try to write in perfect English because no one is going to judge you based on the small mistakes you make when you write in English. I do it because I know my grammar isn't bad, but I still don't want many mistakes. You can do that too if you do it in a legit way and you wouldn't face problems because of it. If you think you are using a tool or a translator that is making your texts detectable then you should avoid using that and write with mistakes which is still better than being marked as a user who uses AI to write their posts.
Thanks for compromise me, publictalk, GbitG brothers.
AP Bhaio ka bohat bohat shukria apny muje Dil SE congratulations de or muje Sachi me bohat Khushi hui ha KY itni mehnat KY bad me finally select ho gia or us SE bar kr muje ye bi khusi ha KY mery Bhai mery Sath meri Khushi me shamil Hoye ha. Or muje appreciate bi kr rahy ha or muje hosala de rahy. Sachi Dil SE bohat hi Khushi hui ha KY AP meri kamyabi KY Sath jury ha or meri is selected SE AP bi khush. Apka bohat bohat shukria AP NY muje speacial Mubarak de ha. Love you brothers
AP Bhaio ka bohat bohat shukria apny muje Dil SE congratulations de or muje Sachi me bohat Khushi hui ha KY itni mehnat KY bad me finally select ho gia or us SE bar kr muje ye bi khusi ha KY mery Bhai mery Sath meri Khushi me shamil Hoye ha. Or muje appreciate bi kr rahy ha or muje hosala de rahy. Sachi Dil SE bohat hi Khushi hui ha KY AP meri kamyabi KY Sath jury ha or meri is selected SE AP bi khush. Apka bohat bohat shukria AP NY muje speacial Mubarak de ha. Love you brothers
Wah bhai, boht mubarak ho.. Maine abi notice kiya k aap campaign men accept hogaye hain aur yeh waqai aek achievement hai aap k liye aur isse yeh bhi zahir hota hai k aap kitni mehnat kr rhe hain qk yeh aapke mehnat ka pal hai..
Humne Unknown OP bhai k stats se yeh b dekha k aapne community men is mahine sbse ziada posts kiye hain toh yeh aapki mehnat hi hai qk itni activity k baad aapka haq banta hai k aapko us cheez ka sila mile aur waqai aapko uska sila mila hai campaign ki shakal men. Lehaza aapko boht boht mubarak ho aur isi tarha mehnat jari rakhiye. Re: Can the MODs nuke this user really quick? He's messing up!
Could it be that the user is testing their bot?
Maybe, but he's surely testing the patience of the moderators at this point with what he's doing in the whole gambling section.
Re: Users who spread false/fake/unhelpful information on technical board
He's been on my Ignore list for a while. Even though he earned 55 Merits, at least his English posts aren't worth reading.
Wait, did he just give you a merit for saying you have him on ignore, and his English posts aren't worth reading? I bet his AI translated your post differently, and he thought you were supporting him for some reason.
P.S.: Sorry for the off-topic post, @ABCbits, but I couldn't hold back.
Understanding the nature, of course if someone has been frustrated most of them do not care what he is doing, the important thing is his anger can be released, we understand that at this time the sig campaign is the main requirement of 5-10 merit 120 days, I am sure that is what makes @bitcoinsummononer running down.
He did all that without ignoring the CFNP campaign, finished, at the break and so on, the important thing was his anger towards the Sig Campaign was released by submitting all the applications, that was my view.
He did all that without ignoring the CFNP campaign, finished, at the break and so on, the important thing was his anger towards the Sig Campaign was released by submitting all the applications, that was my view.
It could be anger, frustration, or desperation, but it can also be a change in ownership, or maybe the account getting hacked/compromised. We are still unsure, and I don't think he will show up in this thread to at least explain himself or give a reason behind what he did or is doing.
Re: Can the MODs nuke this user really quick? He's messing up!
⭐ Merited by SatoPrincess (1)
No way those posts were made from his head, AI effect.
Yep, I just checked and he is using an AI text generator to generate and post those responses, and that's why he's able to do it this quickly. I checked a couple of his posts, and below are the results:
It’s tough for Arsenal, especially after losing at home in the first leg. The pressure is now on them to perform in the second leg at PSG’s stadium, where it’s going to be even more difficult. Arteta will need to come up with a solid strategy to overcome PSG’s defense, and they must take advantage of any chances they get. If Arsenal can’t turn things around, it will be a major blow to their season, especially after losing the Premier League. The stakes are high for them, and fans will be hoping for a miracle in the second leg.
(Archived)
Quillbot: 100% AI-generated
GPTZero: 100% AI-generated
ZeroGPT: 100% AI/GPT
Arsenal were indeed unlucky not to come away with a better result, especially after showing dominance in the second half. PSG's missed opportunities could come back to haunt them if they fail to qualify for the finals. For Arsenal, the one-goal deficit isn't insurmountable, but they need to play with more intensity and focus in the second leg to have any hope of turning things around. It’s going to be a tough challenge, but the game is far from over. We'll see how it unfolds in the second leg.
(Archived)
Quillbot: 100% AI-generated
GPTZero: 79% AI-generated
ZeroGPT: 100% AI/GPT
Most of his posts are pretty short, so you can't check them because most AI detectors would want the text to be at least 80 words or above, but some of them are above 80 words, so I checked only a couple from those.
He probably has an AI text model opened in one tab, and forum on another, and he is copy-pasting posts from the forum to the AI to generate a response, and then copy-pasting the generated answer in the forum and posting it, and that's how he is making so many posts in such a short time.
Mods have noticed him and are starting to take action because I can see at least of his posts deleted in the modlog so far. He might get nuked soon.