Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 905 results by BlackyJacky
Re: ⚖️ Crypto Gambling Foundation ⚖️ - Fair Gambling For All
Since 2 YEARS and 8 months!!! I demand compensation for the unjustifiably lost 30,000 USD at Stake's provably rigged in-house Black Jack system!
Until today, Stake's alleged "Legal Department" is not willing to compensate me, even though they are clearly at fault here!
Below is proof that the Stake in-house Black Jack system is rigged!
Info 1)
The advertised house edge for Stake's in-house Black Jack is 0,5%, which means long-term I will lose 0,5% of all bets placed.
However, if you take a look at my Stake bets statistics here https://ibb.co/Hxf8NpR you can see the following total numbers:
Bets: 180,904
Wins: 78,285
Losses: 86,612
If we reduce the number of wins from the number of losses, we can see that I lost 8,327 bets (86,612 minus 78,285 = 8,327)
Losing 8,327 bets out of 180,904 bets placed = 4,6% of the bets lost.
0,5% house edge out of 180,900 bets placed I should lose 900 bets + a possible small deviation.
8,327 bets lost - 900 bets I should lose = 7,427 bets too much lost.
Info 2)
Bets
After 180,900 bets, the maximal possible deviation from the expected outcome is 0,4%, according to the law of large numbers (See Info 3) below).
180,000 bets x 0,4% = 720 bets I could maximal additionally lose on top of the 900 bets I will lose based on the 0,5% house edge.
7,427 bets too much lost minus 720 bets I can additionally maximal lose = 6,707 bets = additional 9,3 times on top of the maximal possible deviation!
House edge
0,5% house edge = 900 bets plus 720 bets maximal possible deviation = 80% additional maximal possible deviation from the house edge.
0,5% house edge plus 0,4% (80% additional maximal possible deviation) = 0,9% maximal possible experienced house edge!
Experienced house edge 4,6% minus 0,9% maximal possible experienced house edge = 3,7% additional experienced house edge!
3,7% additional experienced house edge : 0,4% additional maximal possible deviation = additional 9,3 times on top of the maximal possible deviation!
Stake's own bets statistics is 100% proof that their in-house Black Jack system is rigged!
Info 3)
When the house edge is 0,5% and you placed 180,900 bets, you will lose 900 bets and the remaining 180,000 bets are coin flips.
The remaining 180,000 bets are coin flips, because you will win 50% = 90,000 bets and lose 50% = 90,000 bets.
Now let's take a look at the technically maximal possible deviation for 180,000 coin flips:
A) Standard deviation for 180,000 coin flips = 212 coin flips = 0,12% (In 68% of all attempts, the deviation is up to 0,12%)
B) 3 times standard deviation for 180,000 coin flips = 0,36% (In 99,7% of all attempts, the deviation is up to 0.36%)
What does 99,7% mean?
When you make 333 times a series of 180,000 coin flips, then 332 times the deviation from the expected outcome will be up to 0,36% and only one time the deviation will be higher than 0,36%.
I was not able to find how much the deviation could be in this one case where it is higher than 0,36%, but likely not more than 10% of the 0,36% = 0,4%.
Below is Stake's deliberate deception answer:
How stupid a multi-billion USD profit online casino operation can be?
While the exact house edge applies only after 1 million bets, the law of great numbers determines the maximal possible deviation from the expected outcome based on the number of attempts.
And the higher the number of bets is, the lower is the maximal possible deviation from the expected outcome!
And after 180,900 bets, the maximal possible deviation from the expected outcome is 0,4%.
0,5% advertised house edge plus 0,4% maximal possible deviation = 0,9% maximal possible experienced house edge after 180,900 bets!
My experienced house edge 4,6% - 0,9% maximal possible experienced house edge = 3,7% ADDITIONAL technically not possible house edge!
Until today, Stake's alleged "Legal Department" is not willing to compensate me, even though they are clearly at fault here!
Below is proof that the Stake in-house Black Jack system is rigged!
Info 1)
The advertised house edge for Stake's in-house Black Jack is 0,5%, which means long-term I will lose 0,5% of all bets placed.
However, if you take a look at my Stake bets statistics here https://ibb.co/Hxf8NpR you can see the following total numbers:
Bets: 180,904
Wins: 78,285
Losses: 86,612
If we reduce the number of wins from the number of losses, we can see that I lost 8,327 bets (86,612 minus 78,285 = 8,327)
Losing 8,327 bets out of 180,904 bets placed = 4,6% of the bets lost.
0,5% house edge out of 180,900 bets placed I should lose 900 bets + a possible small deviation.
8,327 bets lost - 900 bets I should lose = 7,427 bets too much lost.
Info 2)
Bets
After 180,900 bets, the maximal possible deviation from the expected outcome is 0,4%, according to the law of large numbers (See Info 3) below).
180,000 bets x 0,4% = 720 bets I could maximal additionally lose on top of the 900 bets I will lose based on the 0,5% house edge.
7,427 bets too much lost minus 720 bets I can additionally maximal lose = 6,707 bets = additional 9,3 times on top of the maximal possible deviation!
House edge
0,5% house edge = 900 bets plus 720 bets maximal possible deviation = 80% additional maximal possible deviation from the house edge.
0,5% house edge plus 0,4% (80% additional maximal possible deviation) = 0,9% maximal possible experienced house edge!
Experienced house edge 4,6% minus 0,9% maximal possible experienced house edge = 3,7% additional experienced house edge!
3,7% additional experienced house edge : 0,4% additional maximal possible deviation = additional 9,3 times on top of the maximal possible deviation!
Stake's own bets statistics is 100% proof that their in-house Black Jack system is rigged!
Info 3)
When the house edge is 0,5% and you placed 180,900 bets, you will lose 900 bets and the remaining 180,000 bets are coin flips.
The remaining 180,000 bets are coin flips, because you will win 50% = 90,000 bets and lose 50% = 90,000 bets.
Now let's take a look at the technically maximal possible deviation for 180,000 coin flips:
A) Standard deviation for 180,000 coin flips = 212 coin flips = 0,12% (In 68% of all attempts, the deviation is up to 0,12%)
B) 3 times standard deviation for 180,000 coin flips = 0,36% (In 99,7% of all attempts, the deviation is up to 0.36%)
What does 99,7% mean?
When you make 333 times a series of 180,000 coin flips, then 332 times the deviation from the expected outcome will be up to 0,36% and only one time the deviation will be higher than 0,36%.
I was not able to find how much the deviation could be in this one case where it is higher than 0,36%, but likely not more than 10% of the 0,36% = 0,4%.
Below is Stake's deliberate deception answer:
Quote from: Stake legal department
The user has reached out to the complaints department more than 30 times for the same inquiry.
We have provided the user with the requested information and guided them on validating the license in accordance with Antillephones' preferred procedures.
The User has also been attempting to claim that the 8048/JAZ license is invalid for cryptocurrencies.
Our system allows users to access their complete bet history from the date of registration, and there is no limit on the data storage.
All data stored under the "bet archive" and other sections of your account, are protected by our License, which we strictly adhere to.
For the Blackjack game, users can easily filter data in their bet archive spreadsheet.
Our licensing information and regulations have been transparently available on our website since Stake's inception.
Upon registration, the User acknowledges and accepts our Terms of Service which provide information the above and also provides this clearly.
Prior to using our services, it's crucial for users to comprehend the inherent risks associated with gambling, as winning cannot be guaranteed.
Regarding RTP, it's important to note that this figure is based on a calculation involving at least 1 million bets.
In short sessions with a few hundred or thousand bets, variability is expected, it is impossible to make accurate calculations based on these sessions.
Overall, the frivolous claims made by this User have been explained to them many times by Support and other members of the community:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2178857.400.
It is clear to us that there are no ground for reimbursement.
We have provided the user with the requested information and guided them on validating the license in accordance with Antillephones' preferred procedures.
The User has also been attempting to claim that the 8048/JAZ license is invalid for cryptocurrencies.
Our system allows users to access their complete bet history from the date of registration, and there is no limit on the data storage.
All data stored under the "bet archive" and other sections of your account, are protected by our License, which we strictly adhere to.
For the Blackjack game, users can easily filter data in their bet archive spreadsheet.
Our licensing information and regulations have been transparently available on our website since Stake's inception.
Upon registration, the User acknowledges and accepts our Terms of Service which provide information the above and also provides this clearly.
Prior to using our services, it's crucial for users to comprehend the inherent risks associated with gambling, as winning cannot be guaranteed.
Regarding RTP, it's important to note that this figure is based on a calculation involving at least 1 million bets.
In short sessions with a few hundred or thousand bets, variability is expected, it is impossible to make accurate calculations based on these sessions.
Overall, the frivolous claims made by this User have been explained to them many times by Support and other members of the community:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2178857.400.
It is clear to us that there are no ground for reimbursement.
How stupid a multi-billion USD profit online casino operation can be?
While the exact house edge applies only after 1 million bets, the law of great numbers determines the maximal possible deviation from the expected outcome based on the number of attempts.
And the higher the number of bets is, the lower is the maximal possible deviation from the expected outcome!
And after 180,900 bets, the maximal possible deviation from the expected outcome is 0,4%.
0,5% advertised house edge plus 0,4% maximal possible deviation = 0,9% maximal possible experienced house edge after 180,900 bets!
My experienced house edge 4,6% - 0,9% maximal possible experienced house edge = 3,7% ADDITIONAL technically not possible house edge!
Re: 🚨 STAKE.COM’S RTP IS A SCAM! MATHEMATICALLY IMPOSSIBLE!
As of today, July 13, 2025, Stake is still running a provably rigged in-house Black Jack system!
Re: ⚖️ Crypto Gambling Foundation ⚖️ - Fair Gambling For All
@nutildah
Why did you skip the primary school?
I will inform about Stake's provably rigged in-house Black Jack system until the handcuffs will click on Bijan and Edward!
Whether you like it or not.
Why did you skip the primary school?
I will inform about Stake's provably rigged in-house Black Jack system until the handcuffs will click on Bijan and Edward!
Whether you like it or not.
Re: ⚖️ Crypto Gambling Foundation ⚖️ - Fair Gambling For All
@gunhell16
Did you skip the primary school?
Did you skip the primary school?
Re: 🚨 STAKE.COM’S RTP IS A SCAM! MATHEMATICALLY IMPOSSIBLE!
Sorry for bumping the thread guys
I had to make an account just for this, i was reading this entire thread and it was so entertaining i finished all the pages.
This was a blast reading through, the op definitely has an illness LOL still hasn't moved an inch after years of everybody telling him otherwise it's hilarious.
Anyways that was all, take the rage bait op please i wanna read more LOL.
Have a nice week lads!
I had to make an account just for this, i was reading this entire thread and it was so entertaining i finished all the pages.
This was a blast reading through, the op definitely has an illness LOL still hasn't moved an inch after years of everybody telling him otherwise it's hilarious.
Anyways that was all, take the rage bait op please i wanna read more LOL.
Have a nice week lads!
So you are an online doctor, analysing the mental status of Stake victims online?
Please show us your doctor's title?
Are you also qualified to comment on the house edge?
If yes, please let us check it and answer the below questions:
You go to a brick and mortar casino with 1,000 USD and make 10 USD bets at a Black Jack table:
Example A)
After 100 bets made you leave the table with 980 USD
1) How many bets did you lose?
2) How much percentage is your experienced house edge?
Example B)
After 100 bets made you leave the table with 1,020 USD
1) How many bets did you win?
2) How much percentage is your experienced player edge?
Example C)
After 100 bets made you leave the table with 1,000 USD
1) How many bets did you lose or win?
2) How much percentage is your experienced house or player edge?
To answer my questions, please use the following format:
Example A)
1) ? bets
2) ? %
Example B)
1) ? bets
2) ? %
Example C)
1) ? bets
2) ? %
My Pleasure my man.
Example A:
You started with $1,000 and left with $980 after 100 bets of $10 each. That’s a net loss of $20, which is the same as losing 2 bets.
Experienced house edge = (20 / 1000) x 100 = 2.0%
Example B:
You left with $1,020, a net gain of $20 (2 bets won).
Experienced player edge = (20 / 1000) x 100 = 2.0%
Example C:
You broke even, so you neither lost nor won any bets.
Experienced edge = (0 / 1000) x 100 = 0%
Correct!
No doctor degree needed for simple math.
The nonsense hallucinators here are not able to understand simple math!
If you went to high school you would know this three-fold.
I went to high school and I know it.
I developed this test for the nonsense hallucinators here, to see if they are qualified to comment in regard to house edge.
Do you also understand that if your experienced house edge is multiple times higher than the technically maximal possible deviation from the expected outcome, than the system is rigged?
Re: ⚖️ Crypto Gambling Foundation ⚖️ - Fair Gambling For All
I can't believe this conversation is still going on.
As long as desperate signature spammers are desperate to place their hallucinated nonsense to get some cents, the conversation will go on!
I'm beyond baffled by the attitude of this user.
I crushed the scam artists Bijan and Edward, no wonder you are surprised about my attitude.
He released his play logs and it was more than obvious that he didn't play the optimal strategy.
Ahh, it is more than obvious that I didn't play the optimal strategy, but why don't you publish the proof?
He was unaware of that.
Correct, I am unaware that my optimal drawing strategy caused a 5% house edge, instead of the advertised 0,5%.
I even pointed out some examples but it flew right above his head.
You did not publish the proof of my drawing strategy, even though you are in the possession of it!
So you mean, you posted some examples of your hallucinated nonsense?
Blackjack is a game where if you use suboptimal strategy you rely even more on your luck and actually put your odds against you even more.
So you can even raise the house edge. Exactly as blackjacky did and lost.
So you can even raise the house edge. Exactly as blackjacky did and lost.
Why don't you show the proof that my drawing strategy caused a 4,5% house edge instead of the advertised 0,5%?
Publishing hallucinated nonsense is only proof that you are mentally severly insane, but isn't proof of what you claim!
Although he disk actually have some lucky streaks too.
Proof?
Anyway, that should be the end of the discussion.
No, as long as desperate signature spammers are desperate to place their hallucinated nonsense to get some cents, the conversation will go on!
I wonder why stake support didn't include that in their rrsponse too but perhaps they realized it's a stupid case and left it to their lowly support agents for handling instead of wasting the time of an expert.
So it is your hallucinated nonsense against the Stake Legal Department!
Let me guess, the Stake Legal Department is wrong and the mentally severly insane nonsense hallucinator is right?
Oh wait, the Stake Legal Department didn't say my drawing strategy caused my experienced 4,5% house edge, because I used optimal drawing strategy!
Re: 🚨 STAKE.COM’S RTP IS A SCAM! MATHEMATICALLY IMPOSSIBLE!
Sorry for bumping the thread guys
I had to make an account just for this, i was reading this entire thread and it was so entertaining i finished all the pages.
This was a blast reading through, the op definitely has an illness LOL still hasn't moved an inch after years of everybody telling him otherwise it's hilarious.
Anyways that was all, take the rage bait op please i wanna read more LOL.
Have a nice week lads!
I had to make an account just for this, i was reading this entire thread and it was so entertaining i finished all the pages.
This was a blast reading through, the op definitely has an illness LOL still hasn't moved an inch after years of everybody telling him otherwise it's hilarious.
Anyways that was all, take the rage bait op please i wanna read more LOL.
Have a nice week lads!
So you are an online doctor, analysing the mental status of Stake victims online?
Please show us your doctor's title?
Are you also qualified to comment on the house edge?
If yes, please let us check it and answer the below questions:
You go to a brick and mortar casino with 1,000 USD and make 10 USD bets at a Black Jack table:
Example A)
After 100 bets made you leave the table with 980 USD
1) How many bets did you lose?
2) How much percentage is your experienced house edge?
Example B)
After 100 bets made you leave the table with 1,020 USD
1) How many bets did you win?
2) How much percentage is your experienced player edge?
Example C)
After 100 bets made you leave the table with 1,000 USD
1) How many bets did you lose or win?
2) How much percentage is your experienced house or player edge?
To answer my questions, please use the following format:
Example A)
1) ? bets
2) ? %
Example B)
1) ? bets
2) ? %
Example C)
1) ? bets
2) ? %
Re: ⚖️ Crypto Gambling Foundation ⚖️ - Fair Gambling For All
You cannot determine a house edge from wins and losses when it comes to Blackjack.
How did Stake calculate the 0,5% advertised house edge?
Re: ⚖️ Crypto Gambling Foundation ⚖️ - Fair Gambling For All
@nutildah
You want to add content in regard to the house edge?
Then you first need to show that you are qualified!
You want to add content in regard to the house edge?
Then you first need to show that you are qualified!
Nobody needs to do anything for you.
Not for me, for the other users here to show that you are qualified to comment in regard to the house edge.
You're the alt account of the least trusted account on the forum... you have less credibility than a brand new account.
Proven facts don't need any credibility!
You aknowledge that you aren't able to do very basic math and therefore you aren't qualified to comment in reagard to the house edge!
Correct. And 100 bets made and 2 bets net loss is how much percent?
Nice hallucination here!
The exact house edge applies only after 1 million bets.
The result after 100 or 1,000 or 10,000 bets is your experienced house or player edge.
This isn't something I made up, this is a fact!
Why is it a fact?
Because the casino doesn't reduce the house edge from every bet amount.
Proven facts don't need any credibility!
We've done this exercise in futility 10 times already, but:
1) Impossible to determine.
You go to a brick and mortar casino with 1,000 USD and make 10 USD bets at a Black Jack table:
Example A)
After 100 bets made you leave the table with 980 USD
1) How many bets did you lose?
2) How much percentage is your experienced house edge?
Example A)
After 100 bets made you leave the table with 980 USD
1) How many bets did you lose?
2) How much percentage is your experienced house edge?
1) Impossible to determine.
You aknowledge that you aren't able to do very basic math and therefore you aren't qualified to comment in reagard to the house edge!
It suggests a net 2 bets lost,
Correct. And 100 bets made and 2 bets net loss is how much percent?
but also suggests that the player never won a Blackjack (highly unlikely after 100 hands) and that there were never any splits or double downs.
Nice hallucination here!
2) There is no such thing as "experienced house edge." It is a term you have made up.
The exact house edge applies only after 1 million bets.
The result after 100 or 1,000 or 10,000 bets is your experienced house or player edge.
This isn't something I made up, this is a fact!
Why is it a fact?
Because the casino doesn't reduce the house edge from every bet amount.
Re: ⚖️ Crypto Gambling Foundation ⚖️ - Fair Gambling For All
@nutildah
You want to add content in regard to the house edge?
Then you first need to show that you are qualified!
You go to a brick and mortar casino with 1,000 USD and make 10 USD bets at a Black Jack table:
Example A)
After 100 bets made you leave the table with 980 USD
1) How many bets did you lose?
2) How much percentage is your experienced house edge?
Example B)
After 100 bets made you leave the table with 1,020 USD
1) How many bets did you win?
2) How much percentage is your experienced player edge?
Example C)
After 100 bets made you leave the table with 1,000 USD
1) How many bets did you lose or win?
2) How much percentage is your experienced house or player edge?
To answer my questions, please use the following format:
Example A)
1) ? bets
2) ? %
Example B)
1) ? bets
2) ? %
Example C)
1) ? bets
2) ? %
You want to add content in regard to the house edge?
Then you first need to show that you are qualified!
You go to a brick and mortar casino with 1,000 USD and make 10 USD bets at a Black Jack table:
Example A)
After 100 bets made you leave the table with 980 USD
1) How many bets did you lose?
2) How much percentage is your experienced house edge?
Example B)
After 100 bets made you leave the table with 1,020 USD
1) How many bets did you win?
2) How much percentage is your experienced player edge?
Example C)
After 100 bets made you leave the table with 1,000 USD
1) How many bets did you lose or win?
2) How much percentage is your experienced house or player edge?
To answer my questions, please use the following format:
Example A)
1) ? bets
2) ? %
Example B)
1) ? bets
2) ? %
Example C)
1) ? bets
2) ? %
Re: 🚨 STAKE.COM’S RTP IS A SCAM! MATHEMATICALLY IMPOSSIBLE!
The new partner in crime, the Curacao Gaming Control Board gave on June 2025 a license to the website stake.com, even though I inform them (with proof) since December 2023 about the provably rigged in-house Black Jack system on the website stake.com!
The mirror websites still operate without a license!
The mirror websites still operate without a license!
Re: [STAKE.COM] [BITPANDA.COM] 40 LTC Scam - Who's responsible ?
Bitpanda doesn't have any responsibility, because they are obligated by AML laws to send the funds back if the transaction is suspicious.
Of course they have a responsability there.
BUT BIG CHANGE TODAY, i finally got credited, Bitpanda did the job and refunded me after a week. THAT'S A HUGE GREEN FLAG for them.
GGWP Bitpanda !
Quote the law saying that financial institutions sending funds back because of money laundering suspicion are responsible?
This is about rejecting a deposit to a wrong address imo...
Your Bitpanda account LTC deposit address you gave to Stake for your was wrong?
And as Bitpanda did not know to which Bitpanda account holder this LTC address belongs, they send it back to the sender address?
Bitpanda recognized their responsability so i guess most of the people here were right.
You say that Bitpanda is responsible, but you are not able to quote the law saying that financial institutions sending funds back because of money laundering suspicion are responsible!
Re: [STAKE.COM] [BITPANDA.COM] 40 LTC Scam - Who's responsible ?
Bitpanda doesn't have any responsibility, because they are obligated by AML laws to send the funds back if the transaction is suspicious.
Of course they have a responsability there.
BUT BIG CHANGE TODAY, i finally got credited, Bitpanda did the job and refunded me after a week. THAT'S A HUGE GREEN FLAG for them.
GGWP Bitpanda !
I don't know why Bitpanda sent the funds back, but I they did it because of money laundering suspicion, they don't have any responsibility.
Re: ⚖️ Crypto Gambling Foundation ⚖️ - Fair Gambling For All
Since 2 YEARS and 7 months!!! I demand compensation for the unjustifiably lost 30,000 USD at Stake's provably rigged in-house Black Jack system!
Until today, Stake's alleged "Legal Department" is not willing to compensate me, even though they are clearly at fault here!
Below is proof that the Stake in-house Black Jack system is rigged!
Info 1)
The advertised house edge for Stake's in-house Black Jack is 0,5%, which means long-term I will lose 0,5% of all bets placed.
However, if you take a look at my Stake bets statistics here https://ibb.co/Hxf8NpR you can see the following total numbers:
Bets: 180,904
Wins: 78,285
Losses: 86,612
If we reduce the number of wins from the number of losses, we can see that I lost 8,327 bets (86,612 minus 78,285 = 8,327)
Losing 8,327 bets out of 180,904 bets placed = 4,6% of the bets lost.
0,5% house edge out of 180,900 bets placed I should lose 900 bets + a possible small deviation.
8,327 bets lost - 900 bets I should lose = 7,427 bets too much lost.
Info 2)
Bets
After 180,900 bets, the maximal possible deviation from the expected outcome is 0,4%, according to the law of large numbers (See Info 3) below).
180,000 bets x 0,4% = 720 bets I could maximal additionally lose on top of the 900 bets I will lose based on the 0,5% house edge.
7,427 bets too much lost minus 720 bets I can additionally maximal lose = 6,707 bets = additional 9,3 times on top of the maximal possible deviation!
House edge
0,5% house edge = 900 bets plus 720 bets maximal possible deviation = 80% additional maximal possible deviation from the house edge.
0,5% house edge plus 0,4% (80% additional maximal possible deviation) = 0,9% maximal possible experienced house edge!
Experienced house edge 4,6% minus 0,9% maximal possible experienced house edge = 3,7% additional experienced house edge!
3,7% additional experienced house edge : 0,4% additional maximal possible deviation = additional 9,3 times on top of the maximal possible deviation!
Stake's own bets statistics is 100% proof that their in-house Black Jack system is rigged!
Info 3)
When the house edge is 0,5% and you placed 180,900 bets, you will lose 900 bets and the remaining 180,000 bets are coin flips.
The remaining 180,000 bets are coin flips, because you will win 50% = 90,000 bets and lose 50% = 90,000 bets.
Now let's take a look at the technically maximal possible deviation for 180,000 coin flips:
A) Standard deviation for 180,000 coin flips = 212 coin flips = 0,12% (In 68% of all attempts, the deviation is up to 0,12%)
B) 3 times standard deviation for 180,000 coin flips = 0,36% (In 99,7% of all attempts, the deviation is up to 0.36%)
What does 99,7% mean?
When you make 333 times a series of 180,000 coin flips, then 332 times the deviation from the expected outcome will be up to 0,36% and only one time the deviation will be higher than 0,36%.
I was not able to find how much the deviation could be in this one case where it is higher than 0,36%, but likely not more than 10% of the 0,36% = 0,4%.
Below is Stake's deliberate deception answer:
How stupid a multi-billion USD profit online casino operation can be?
While the exact house edge applies only after 1 million bets, the law of great numbers determines the maximal possible deviation from the expected outcome based on the number of attempts.
And the higher the number of bets is, the lower is the maximal possible deviation from the expected outcome!
And after 180,900 bets, the maximal possible deviation from the expected outcome is 0,4%.
0,5% advertised house edge plus 0,4% maximal possible deviation = 0,9% maximal possible experienced house edge after 180,900 bets!
My experienced house edge 4,6% - 0,9% maximal possible experienced house edge = 3,7% ADDITIONAL technically not possible house edge!
Until today, Stake's alleged "Legal Department" is not willing to compensate me, even though they are clearly at fault here!
Below is proof that the Stake in-house Black Jack system is rigged!
Info 1)
The advertised house edge for Stake's in-house Black Jack is 0,5%, which means long-term I will lose 0,5% of all bets placed.
However, if you take a look at my Stake bets statistics here https://ibb.co/Hxf8NpR you can see the following total numbers:
Bets: 180,904
Wins: 78,285
Losses: 86,612
If we reduce the number of wins from the number of losses, we can see that I lost 8,327 bets (86,612 minus 78,285 = 8,327)
Losing 8,327 bets out of 180,904 bets placed = 4,6% of the bets lost.
0,5% house edge out of 180,900 bets placed I should lose 900 bets + a possible small deviation.
8,327 bets lost - 900 bets I should lose = 7,427 bets too much lost.
Info 2)
Bets
After 180,900 bets, the maximal possible deviation from the expected outcome is 0,4%, according to the law of large numbers (See Info 3) below).
180,000 bets x 0,4% = 720 bets I could maximal additionally lose on top of the 900 bets I will lose based on the 0,5% house edge.
7,427 bets too much lost minus 720 bets I can additionally maximal lose = 6,707 bets = additional 9,3 times on top of the maximal possible deviation!
House edge
0,5% house edge = 900 bets plus 720 bets maximal possible deviation = 80% additional maximal possible deviation from the house edge.
0,5% house edge plus 0,4% (80% additional maximal possible deviation) = 0,9% maximal possible experienced house edge!
Experienced house edge 4,6% minus 0,9% maximal possible experienced house edge = 3,7% additional experienced house edge!
3,7% additional experienced house edge : 0,4% additional maximal possible deviation = additional 9,3 times on top of the maximal possible deviation!
Stake's own bets statistics is 100% proof that their in-house Black Jack system is rigged!
Info 3)
When the house edge is 0,5% and you placed 180,900 bets, you will lose 900 bets and the remaining 180,000 bets are coin flips.
The remaining 180,000 bets are coin flips, because you will win 50% = 90,000 bets and lose 50% = 90,000 bets.
Now let's take a look at the technically maximal possible deviation for 180,000 coin flips:
A) Standard deviation for 180,000 coin flips = 212 coin flips = 0,12% (In 68% of all attempts, the deviation is up to 0,12%)
B) 3 times standard deviation for 180,000 coin flips = 0,36% (In 99,7% of all attempts, the deviation is up to 0.36%)
What does 99,7% mean?
When you make 333 times a series of 180,000 coin flips, then 332 times the deviation from the expected outcome will be up to 0,36% and only one time the deviation will be higher than 0,36%.
I was not able to find how much the deviation could be in this one case where it is higher than 0,36%, but likely not more than 10% of the 0,36% = 0,4%.
Below is Stake's deliberate deception answer:
Quote from: Stake legal department
The user has reached out to the complaints department more than 30 times for the same inquiry.
We have provided the user with the requested information and guided them on validating the license in accordance with Antillephones' preferred procedures.
The User has also been attempting to claim that the 8048/JAZ license is invalid for cryptocurrencies.
Our system allows users to access their complete bet history from the date of registration, and there is no limit on the data storage.
All data stored under the "bet archive" and other sections of your account, are protected by our License, which we strictly adhere to.
For the Blackjack game, users can easily filter data in their bet archive spreadsheet.
Our licensing information and regulations have been transparently available on our website since Stake's inception.
Upon registration, the User acknowledges and accepts our Terms of Service which provide information the above and also provides this clearly.
Prior to using our services, it's crucial for users to comprehend the inherent risks associated with gambling, as winning cannot be guaranteed.
Regarding RTP, it's important to note that this figure is based on a calculation involving at least 1 million bets.
In short sessions with a few hundred or thousand bets, variability is expected, it is impossible to make accurate calculations based on these sessions.
Overall, the frivolous claims made by this User have been explained to them many times by Support and other members of the community:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2178857.400.
It is clear to us that there are no ground for reimbursement.
We have provided the user with the requested information and guided them on validating the license in accordance with Antillephones' preferred procedures.
The User has also been attempting to claim that the 8048/JAZ license is invalid for cryptocurrencies.
Our system allows users to access their complete bet history from the date of registration, and there is no limit on the data storage.
All data stored under the "bet archive" and other sections of your account, are protected by our License, which we strictly adhere to.
For the Blackjack game, users can easily filter data in their bet archive spreadsheet.
Our licensing information and regulations have been transparently available on our website since Stake's inception.
Upon registration, the User acknowledges and accepts our Terms of Service which provide information the above and also provides this clearly.
Prior to using our services, it's crucial for users to comprehend the inherent risks associated with gambling, as winning cannot be guaranteed.
Regarding RTP, it's important to note that this figure is based on a calculation involving at least 1 million bets.
In short sessions with a few hundred or thousand bets, variability is expected, it is impossible to make accurate calculations based on these sessions.
Overall, the frivolous claims made by this User have been explained to them many times by Support and other members of the community:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2178857.400.
It is clear to us that there are no ground for reimbursement.
How stupid a multi-billion USD profit online casino operation can be?
While the exact house edge applies only after 1 million bets, the law of great numbers determines the maximal possible deviation from the expected outcome based on the number of attempts.
And the higher the number of bets is, the lower is the maximal possible deviation from the expected outcome!
And after 180,900 bets, the maximal possible deviation from the expected outcome is 0,4%.
0,5% advertised house edge plus 0,4% maximal possible deviation = 0,9% maximal possible experienced house edge after 180,900 bets!
My experienced house edge 4,6% - 0,9% maximal possible experienced house edge = 3,7% ADDITIONAL technically not possible house edge!
Re: [STAKE.COM] [BITPANDA.COM] 40 LTC Scam - Who's responsible ?
Stake’s answer:
Hello there.
We are contacting you regarding the LTC transaction that you have submitted to be recovered.
Unfortunately, you have sent the funds to an address that belongs to another account, therefore we are simply not able to recover them.
We are, by no means, able to simply deduce the funds from other players accounts, therefore the recovery procedure is canceled and the funds are permanently lost.
Kindly try to be a bit more careful with your transactions in the future, since we can't always guarantee a successful recovery, and we have a limited number of transactions to be recovered per account.
Hello there.
We are contacting you regarding the LTC transaction that you have submitted to be recovered.
Unfortunately, you have sent the funds to an address that belongs to another account, therefore we are simply not able to recover them.
We are, by no means, able to simply deduce the funds from other players accounts, therefore the recovery procedure is canceled and the funds are permanently lost.
Kindly try to be a bit more careful with your transactions in the future, since we can't always guarantee a successful recovery, and we have a limited number of transactions to be recovered per account.
Bijan and Edward are proven stupid liars and criminals!
Stake sent your LTC withdrawal to Bitpanda from Stake's LTC wallet.
And when Bitpanda sends the LTC back to the Stake sender address(es), then they sent the LTC back to the Stake LTC wallet.
How is it technically possible that the 40 LTC Bitpanda sent to the Stake LTC wallet went to a Stake player account?
Despite of this, all deposits to player accounts go to a Stake wallet.
So if the 40 LTC are on a player account, the 40 LTC are on a Stake wallet and Stake can send them to you!
Such stupid scam liars!
Re: [STAKE.COM] [BITPANDA.COM] 40 LTC Scam - Who's responsible ?
Feel free to listen to hallucinated nonsense, but when Stake embezzles your 40 LTC, then it is Stake's fault!