The admins should review this thread prior to considering to unban the OP!

The owner of Just Dice advertising those scam sites is only a small piece of the puzzle. The owner of Just Dice was also actively telling people to play at the scam sites, which was him defacto telling people to invest their BTC at those scam sites' bankrolls that eventually got stolen. The scam sites also stole money from the bankrolls almost immediately after the owner of Just Dice was able to withdraw his BTC. If the scam sites were planning on scamming then they might as well have not honored the withdrawal request from the owner of Just Dice unless this person was somehow involved in the scam.

One explanation, that I personally believe as to how the owner of Just Dice was able to withdraw his BTC before those sites stole the BTC in their bankrolls was that the sites sent the owner of Just Dice an equal (or greater) amount of BTC as "collateral" so the owner of Just Dice could deposit his "own" BTC to those scam sites, and possibly earn a fee from doing so. There would be no risk to the owner of Just Dice, but he would still be allowed to publicly proclaim that he was investing in (and "trusting") these scam sites in order to give them additional legitimacy. Just Dice actually engaged in a similar setup with inputs.io and TradeFortress (someone who turned out to be a serial scammer who has stolen thousands of BTC on multiple occasions) openly.

The owner behind Just-Dice has been involved in multiple multi-million dollar thefts from crowdfunded bankrolls. The owner of Just-Dice was never "officially" behind these sites, however he was involved to the point that he was telling people to gamble on these sites, was publicly investing in these sites' bankrolls (yet managed to not lose any money when the bankrolls were stolen), and was advertising for these sites.

I think it should be safe to say that any site that the owner of Just-Dice is involved in, including Just-Dice should be considered a scam

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=856691 - JonD0w1968

That signature is from John K's GPG key from back in 2013.

It looks like he has been AFK for a while, otherwise I could ask him who he sent that message to

Should I assume this means that you are unable to sign a message?

Do you have a link to the post that discussed the ICO expiring within the next 24 hours? Are you able to sign a message from one of the addresses that I suggested?

I am pretty sure that you are just trying to increase your post count by asking for a loan that you know you will not get, both because you have never been trusted with anywhere near the amount you are asking for and because of your absurdly low interest rate you are offering.

With the above being said, I will play your game. What ICO are you interested in participating in that closes within the next 24 hours? How are you planning on purchasing BTC to repay your loan/acquiring BTC to repay your loan within the next 24 hours?

Are you able to sign a message from an old address associated with your account such as:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=717300.msg8114856#msg8114856

It is fairly obvious that you are just making useless posts in order to increase your post count. You have zero history of being trusted with any amount of money and the interest you are offering is essentially zero. This is in addition to the fact that the OP has not made any loans via this thread or otherwise in months. There is no chance  that your loan will be approved and you know it.

Scammer

It should be fairly obvious that the OP is promoting a scam site

I verified your GPG signed message and left you a negative rating. I archived your profile, which currently has a link to your GPG key.

It looks like your password was recently reset via email about 3 hours ago. Was your email address public? Was your email hacked?

Anyway, please let me know once you have access to your account again and I will remove my negative trust.

Hi there,
I got my account back after it's been hacked. I'd appreciate it if my negative ratings were now removed.. I've signed a message with my known vanity address '1BoeLensDrVHLjYW4pPab5UENKBuDupfKt'.

I signed the following message, without quotes : "As of May 20, 2016 (20-05-16) I, Boelens have retrieved access to my account. It is now fully under my control."
With the address : 1BoeLensDrVHLjYW4pPab5UENKBuDupfKt
Signature : G60RzE16vNSTUmOr5Z7v3/343niVeXMPWnD1h1MkyglpXnPLC+/XtOYKKcZRBkOZNX5DFAI7iejcfVV6vrKW9Xc=

You have made multiple scam attempts in the very recent past. At this point the comment on your trust does not matter. I don't think you can, but if you can get me to agree to remove your current negative then I will just add another with another comment about your scam attempts.

what

I received the following PMx from The Prince Of Egifts:


He is pretty clearly just blowing a bunch of smoke, but is still very annoying. I had asked for proof of his transaction with Skeptical One

I also believe that he has the following alts:
iulianbutanu - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=834958
Tred - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=823413
Skeptical One - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=696473

This is based on the fact that they have all had successful trades with Skeptical One who is clearly a scammer and most of the alts have also scammed others.

Asking for another loan with bogus/worthless collateral is not helping your cause

It is pretty rare, but sometimes I may make mistakes when I leave a trust rating.

Please post here (or PM me) if you disagree with a trust rating that I have left. Or if you think you have reformed yourself and no longer deserve the trust rating that I left you, please post here (or PM me).

-

This is not exactly the kind of person that I would consider doing business with.

If I had to guess I would say this guy is butthurt that his obvious scam is not working

I have left a negative trust that will remain until the lenders recover their money.

Add me to the list.

You can send the gratitude here