BitcoinBoardGame.com
BoardGameBitcoin.com

Both for Sale.  Some similarly named twitter/social accounts can be included as well.
Would love to see someone develop a project in this direction. 

Accepting offers here or via PM.
BTC / ETH preferred but anything can be made to work.
I don't think Escrow.com handles crypto anymore (I've been out of the loop for a while) but I'm sure some sort of trusted domain escrow service exists upon which we could both agree.

Happy bidding.

WalletReputation.com

For Sale.

Accepting offers here or via PM.
BTC / ETH preferred but anything can be made to work.
I don't think Escrow.com handles crypto anymore (I've been out of the loop for a while) but I'm sure some sort of trusted domain escrow service exists upon which we could both agree.

Happy bidding.

PoolEthereum.com

For Sale.

Accepting offers here or via PM.
BTC / ETH preferred but anything can be made to work.
I don't think Escrow.com handles crypto anymore (I've been out of the loop for a while) but I'm sure some sort of trusted domain escrow service exists upon which we could both agree.

Happy bidding.

Looks like PoW ends on block 262800 and the BCC blockchain is currently at height 206387.  Unclear when the estimated transition to PoS-only will occur given highly variable block times across last ~50 blocks.
https://www.blockexperts.com/bcc

Is proof-of-work mining still occurring with BCC or is minting currently PoS only?
I can't seem to find information on the lifecycle of coinbase design for BCC.  Asking here before I poke around the code to see if it is easily discernible there.

Is anyone aware of an instrument, mechanism, or exchange-trade of any manner that allows for the shorting of BCC?

Do any instruments exist at present by which one could short Bitconnect?

For anyone interested, Theymos has posted a poll regarding what to do with the Wall Obs. situation:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1993570.0

To those who say Bitcoin and Bitcoin only, what would you say to those who notice the dominance share of Bitcoin declining over time relative to the crypto market as a whole?
Is this a temporary trend?  Immaterial?  The numbers seem hard to ignore at present. 

With how quickly the space is moving, it's certainly possible that the eventual winner(s) in the space won't necessarily be those at the top of the list right now.  However, it's hard to imagine BTC / ETH, at the very least, being entirely supplanted.

This message by Theymos explains the most recent locking of the previous Wall Obs. thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1990962.msg19827736#msg19827736

Who are the best speculators around?  Are they on this board or elsewhere?

Whose post history tells the greatest tale of accurate prediction and keen insight?  Who was right when everyone else was wrong?

What if the best speculators are just whales of sufficient size to enact their own predictions?

Is the signal to noise ratio worth the time investment involved in parsing through many of the posts here?
If you know what others don't, why share that information ahead of time?  Are the reputational gains sufficiently explanatory?

I'm curious about the value ( both true and perceived ) of this board as a meaningful tool.  Or is it all just a cacophony of guesses, generated and read for entertainment?

Start by trading synthetically ( i.e. on paper with fantasy funds ).  Stay honest; commit for at least a month or a quarter.  See how you do and reevaluate subsequently.
Read books on technical trading; lists of the classics are everywhere.
Identify others who trade and see what they do ( or rather, what they say they will do and how successful or not their decisions are ).  Trust predictions, not retrospectives.
Even still, the markets are small enough and there are enough anonymous whales out there that big moves can happen on the whim of an individual; there's no way around that.

Too much homelessness is driven by addiction and mental illness for paper-wallet handouts to be claimed at any significant rate.
Those most likely to lay claim to the funds therein would be the people who, after a day of panhandling, drive home to the houses that they pretend not to have during the day.
College students would be a better target group.  Given their average debt, they are also almost surely poorer ( if only on paper ).

Distribution remains an oft-overlooked consideration with Bitcoin.  Large swaths of currency are held in high concentration by few actors.
Absolute poverty may be alleviated by some global cryptocurrency adoption ( direct access to all markets, fewer middlemen, etc. ).  Consider, for example, what MPESA has achieved in Africa.  Relative poverty, however, may even be exacerbated by cryptocurrency.

One consideration that is often overlooked in such comparative discussions is the operational security required when handling crypto.  Physical security is important with gold but if you input the wrong combination on your safe, your gold doesn't have a chance of disappearing. 
Not necessarily an insoluble problem but user experience remains frightening even for many technically-competent users.

Bought bitcoin, of course!

A curious parallel train of thought that I have heard goes something like this:

As the number of Bitcoin nodes continues to decline and mining centralization continues to be an issue, does Bitcoin's decentralization become a less compelling argument in it's favor when compared with potentially looming blockchain offerings run by existing banking institutions?

Not my own argument but perhaps it is worth considering.

see:
https://bitnodes.21.co/dashboard/?days=365
https://blog.ethereum.org/2014/06/19/mining (from last year but still relevant)

I'm curious about your estimate of 1-1.5 million users.  Although knowing for sure is impossible, have you read any recent, compelling research that suggests those figures are accurate?  Adoption is a critical metric to track but other than the figures self-reported by online wallet services with KYC barriers, it seems difficult to even venture a guess at a headcount.

Yes, mainly for research purposes.

No worries.  I'm glad to get these resources into the hands of the folks now running the project.

Distribution (i.e. concentration of cryptocurrency amongst early adopters) is one of the big economic/psychological issues I see frequently in my conversations with folks who are interested in cryptocurrency but who nonetheless remain on the sidelines.  Auroracoin was the first serious project I noticed that sought to address distribution in a novel and compelling fashion. 

Best of luck to the team as they move forward!

For some of the research regarding distribution please see:

• Risto Pietilä's research:
  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=316297.0
• Mining research presentation:
  https://youtu.be/aHX34MbXuOk?t=17153
• Presentation slides:
  http://davidlio.com/mining
• Research paper collection:
  http://smithandcrown.com/research