I've heard that Bitcoin will finish mining in 2140, which is certainly a long way off. There's still a chance for us to continue dca BTC, as there's a strong possibility that in the future we'll see a higher BTC price than today, as BTC is constantly being mined, and we'll eventually see the BTC supply dwindle. Currently, I know there's only a small amount of unmined BTC left, approximately 1,100,000. While the number currently mined is 19,900,000, there's still time to accumulate BTC.

However, I'd like to know if there will be BTC miners once the supply is fully mined, and will the fees for sending from wallets to exchanges be high?

I also wonder if the price fluctuations will be similar to the current bearish and bullish market.

Currently, BTC is widely traded, buying at a low price and selling at a high price. But will BTC trading be possible in the future, similar to daily trading? I think this is worth discussing...

I also read this news 2 days ago and to be fair it is hard to know if El Salvador is lying to us or the IMF is lying?
But I lean towards the IMF and what they say, simply because El Salvador depends on them for loans, and the survival and interests of the nation must come first.

What is the point of investing in bitcoin if the national economy is collapsing and people's lives are miserable? As president, Nayib Bukele knows that better than anyone, so I think El Salvador is lying to us. But I don't blame them because as I said, the survival and interests of the nation must come first. Not only them, I believe any of us or any country in the same situation would do the same.

If Rishab Pant had not been injured, it would  not have been difficult for India to score 400  runs. Pant managed to score 37 runs on the scoreboard before retiring hurt. It is unfortunate for India that an experienced batsman like Pant retired hurt.

Jadeja and Shardul Thakur are at the crease. Jadeja is very skillful. And in the past matches we have seen better performances from Jadeja. Even then  it is quite hard to score 400 + runs. If india does not lose wickets in the beginning of the day , Jadeja and Thakur can stay at the crease for a long time , then India has a chance of scoring 400 runs. But if India loses wickets in the beginning of the day, then maybe  it will not be possible for India to score 400 runs.

Currently, Pakistani selectors are doing some experiments and these are not working for them just because of this now blaming on pitch or conditions are not helpful for them overall quality in cricket is going down badly.
They needed to work on improvement in domestic structure and other related stuff which give their players better chance of performance and also increase their confidence like India doing through IPL and few other domestic leagues.
Bangladesh having good momentum, but sadly they are also not consistent which is the biggest issue for them, they also needed to keep things on balance and their players also needed to be had consistent performance which will give them good chance of having win against big teams.

Bangladesh winning the series and the last game is still left and Pakistan going clearly to be whitewashed in this series. However, in the last match Fakhar Zaman broke the record and now we should be happy on these such things because Pakistan is not performing so it is the last thing to be happy on.

Now most of you will be wondering which record did he broke, it was the record of taking most catches in the T20 format for Pakistan, 53 catches and if we go back so Babar Azam was there by having 52 catches. In this series, Babar Azam is not selected and there is no update about Babar Azam that will he play the Aisa Cup or not.

India must have to score 400 runs in first innings to stay in the game. Although India lost 4 wickets on day one but Rishabh Pant is retired hurt and if he is not available for batting in first innings then not much batting is left behind. Shoaib Bashir is not playing this test and England relying mostly on seamers in this test. So far seamers have done good job for England by picking wickets and not allowed India to score too many runs. Tomorrow is crucial day for India, they have to make sure they score too many runs on day 2.

That was totally different performance by all players of both teams as we saw big target in this match by Bangladeshi U19 cricket team but South Africa U19 cricket team played very well in this match and chased the score and according to DLS method they won the match by 14 runs. They lost the series but they got respect after this match because players gave excellent effort in this match. Jorich Van was top performer of this match because he did excellent in this match and made 154 runs in this match which was top class performance and he was not out till end of the match and his fielding was also excellent in this matchBangladesh U19 cricket team performance was well but they could not win this match.

However, Bangladesh won the series by winning two consecutive matches and this can be called a big success for Bangladesh because Bangladesh has won very few matches against Pakistan, but this may be the first time for Bangladesh to win the series by winning two consecutive matches in Mirpur, Bangladesh. Pakistani cricket experts largely blame the condition of the Mirpur pitch, with Bangladesh benefiting from their well-known venue. Anyway, Bangladesh has won the match and won the series, so I congratulate Bangladesh on that.

He's probably lying when he says he plays for fun.
I'd believe someone with a lot of money if they said they played for the thrill of it, but fun isn't true.
Even when we play okey with friends, we get grumpy when we lose. If we're good at it, we whistle.
Even in this game, even though we don't win or lose money, I don't speak up when we lose.
And if there's a chance of winning or losing money involved, it's a different story.
Winning might be fun, exciting, and entertaining, but losing isn't fun.
Never...

Nah, I disagree. In my country, there are videos of people from the lower class playing slots while driving or working. When I visited a well-known local online casino, I saw a lot of whales playing, but there were even more people from the low to middle class. Why? Because of poverty. They want to escape poverty through gambling. So even while working or driving, they’re playing slots. It’s their greed for money that pushes them into that situation, and it’s usually the lower class people who end up getting into gambling because of that.

If Pakistan's Faheem Ashraf had not been caught out, Pakistan would have definitely won the match. Pakistan lost after Rishad Hossain was clean bowled off the last ball. However, today, the entire Bangladesh top order was a failure and only with the contribution of Zaker Ali, Bangladesh could score only 133 runs. However, Bangladesh's bowling was very good in the beginning but towards the end, Tanjim Shakib lost control and Rishad Hossain bowled at a high cost. Due to which Bangladesh almost won the match in the end from the possibility of losing.

It won't guarantee to solve the addiction problem of people if they're going to ban it. It will somehow retaliate still to what they've decided with.

Some gamblers might be discouraged with that and might just do some other things aside from gambling.

But the real gamblers will still be committed in finding some areas where they can gamble, physically or online.

Or put some of the capital to work from the get-go and trade little by little with what would be left - to train and to test what was previously learned (hopefully).

I agree with your take, it's a good start, but only with good knowledge.

I came across news that there’s a senator pushing to ban gambling in our country.

So I’d like to ask fellow gamblers here, do you think this move is justified? Or is it too harsh?

We all know that gambling is addictive by nature. No matter our financial status, anyone can fall into addiction. But is banning it entirely really the only solution?
And what could be the possible consequences if gambling were banned in a country? Can you share some thoughts or examples?

Let’s have an open discussion ...

As a parent to the child, can you allow the child to use your details to pass KYC verification, if asked? And if you do that, does it also mean that you are supporting underage gambling?

এগুলো দেখে মেনে নেয়া অনেক কষ্টকর একটা ব্যাপার। চোখের সামনে এরকম ছোট ছোট বাচ্চা গুলো। একটা স্কুল শিক্ষার্থীর যে বর্ণনা শুনেছি, ও যেভাবে বলছে যে কারো মাথা নাই, কারো হাফ বডি নাই। কারো মাথার মগজ নাই। কারো হাত পা আলাদা হয়ে গেছে, এগুলো শুনে আসলে কিছুতেই মেনে নিতে পারছি না। ছোট ছোট বাচ্চা গুলো কিছুই বুঝে না। প্লে থেকে ৮ম শ্রেনী অব্দি সম্ভবত সেই বিল্ডিং এ ক্লাস করে। এই ছোট ছোট বাচ্চা গুলো কিভাবে এই ধকল সামলাবে? আমার নিজের বাচ্চাকে এরকম সিচ্যুয়েশনে কখনোই কল্পনা করতে পারি না। ছোট ছোট মাসুম বাচ্চা গুলোর হাত পা আলাদা হয়ে যাওয়ার খবর শুনেই কষ্ট হচ্ছে। নিজের চোখে দেখার সাহস নেই আমার। বাচ্চা গুলোর জন্য অনেক কষ্ট হচ্ছে। যদিও আমার এক ফ্রেন্ড সেখানে যেতে বলেছিলো, ভেবে দেখলাম সেই এলাকা এমনিতেই মানুষ দিয়ে ভরে গেছে। আমি গেলে সেখানে কোনো হেল্প হবে না। উদ্ধার কাজ চলছে। তবে হয়তো হাসপাতালে রক্ত দিতে পারতাম।

Bangladesh Under 19s vs South Africa Under 19s

Is there anyone here who is familiar with this competition Bangladesh Under-19s tour of South Africa.

Total two matches were successfully finished among South Africa Under 19s squad and Bangladesh Under 19s squad and this match was played two days ago and third match will start tomorrow.  Bangladesh under 19s squad was begun match first with batting inning and batters were managed to collect 265 scores after playing 50 overs with lost of 6 wickets. Zawad Abrar displayed strong strength in start of inning and he managed to collect 57 scores with Azizul Hakim and Rizan Hossan, both collected 52 and 67 scores responsibility. South Africa under 19s squad failed two times and they faced bad defeat in second match and faced defeat with big difference 104 scores.

If you guys can remember, there was an old topic on this board that say that gamblers can not win a casino. While some people believed that that was true, some gamblers also opposed that statement because they believed that sometimes a gambler can win the casino. They believed that if a gambler wins a jackpot, he or she have won the casino, could that be true?

Some people can win a huge amount as jackpota but yet the amount that they won can not be compared to how much money they have lost in entire life while gambling, can you say such person has won the casino because they won a jackpot?

If you believe that sometimes, gamblers can also win the casino, kindly drop all the explanation of why you have such a believe.