Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 32 results by Fauderz
But it is definitely risky, if you are a new trader then you are likely to face the biggest losses. But if you adopt a strategy then surely you will be successful.
It is natural that investment will involve risk so everyone should invest with the risk. New investors suffer more from their investments than experienced investors because they lack experience. However, if a new investor invests in Bitcoin from the initial stage, the probability of loss is less, but it should be hold for a long time.Indeed, this seems like a classic reason where only the benefits we want to get but in the end we also have to be realistic because being in bitcoin for now is not trial and error but must be done with seriousness so that what we do can be profitable for us in the future. In addition, the benefits I mean are also not only based on the money we get later from the results of the investments we make but for bitcoin we still have a hope that in the end we can achieve financial freedom as we expect. Even though the obstacles are difficult as long as we believe that we can get it then indeed we as much as possible must realize it and the obstacle is to continue to believe that we can get our goals and must be prepared with all the risks we get later.
As for Osimhen, I am more confident that he will end up at PSG or Chelsea depending on the readiness in the clause given to Napoli from the 2 clubs rumored to be close to Osimhen at this time.
As for Chelsea they are also still very possible but looking at what Chelsea are doing now that Enzo Maresca has bought several players now it seems like this is also becoming difficult unless Chelsea again burn their money for player transfers.
Knowing the fact marriage is an everlasting agreement, the man is expected to take responsibility and at the other hand bitcoin investment is also there. For example after marriage couple look forward to build a family so mere looking at the responsibility you’ll make every possible effort to find a good job and not depending on your investment, during times like this if an investor have a quality reserve funds I think the reserve funds should stand in the gap and sometimes an investor can decide to take a break from accumulating maybe 2-3 month difference just to balance their financial life before they can start accumulating. In summary having an alternative is always advisable so it will be easier for any investor to continue their investment.
As for the pause, actually I don't really agree with what you said especially if we are focusing on DCA because precisely with a long enough pause that you do it will actually interfere with the DCA activities that you do so instead of that happening then from the beginning you focus first on your own readiness whether the investment you are doing is burdensome or not because if you feel it is burdensome then you can reduce a little from what you planned before.
An emergency fund is definitely important for investing but not all investors can invest by building an emergency fund. There are some investors who have a small amount of money to invest and they start their investment with that small amount of money and do not build up additional funds. Additional endowment is usually done to ensure continuity of investment in which case those who have good financial support can create additional funds to ensure continuity of investment. But I think it has to be done as an investor has no such thing. Emergency fund can be stressful for some people and surely an investor can't hold his investment for a long time with pressure so those investors can invest as they want in this case there is no need to take this pressure. Investors can invest as and when they want and with as much comfort as they can invest, so if it is not possible to build additional funds, then there is no reason to take this matter as a pressure at all. Additional funds can be taken by an investor only as an optional means.
Because in the end, this kind of reserve fund can be an important condition to support the sustainability of what we do, including investment.When someone wants to develop their economic conditions and make investments, they must indirectly know the initial steps that are developed and of course emergency funds are a situation that should not be absent because this will be an important situation to support so that the steps we take to invest and support life in order to continue to survive can be carried out.
This is basic but sometimes not seen by many people even though small things like this must be prepared so that situations that will occur especially with unexpected events can be minimized.
⭐ Merited by Crypto_I.N (1)
Tak terasa pesta pemilu 2024 tinggal 12 hari lagi dan kita akan mengadakan sebuah pesta akbar demokrasi dengan memilih pemimpin baru sebagai panutan dan harapan Indonesias menjadi lebih baik.
Tetapi dalam hal ini tentu saja selain dari kesenangan tentang pestapora pemilihan serentak kita juga pasti tahu ada ke khawatiran yang pasti terjadi untuk saat ini ketika terjadi pemilu.
Berkaca kepada pemilu di 2019 dengan skema yang sama mengusung pemilu serentak dengan pemilihan 5 perwakilan pemimpin dimulai dari Presiden dan Wakil Presiden, Dewan Perwakilan Daerah (DPD), DPR, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah (DPRD) provinsi dan DPRD kabupaten/kota. ada sebuah tragedi yang sebenarnya beberapa waktu lalu sempat ramai kembali dimana pemilu 2019 ini banyak sekali memakan korban khsusunya untuk anggota KPPS.
Refleksi Pemilu 2019, Sebanyak 894 Petugas KPPS Meninggal Dunia
Sebenarnya ada banyak sekali simpang siur tentang jumlah keseluruhan yang meninggal ketika pemilu 2019 tetapi saya hanya mengambil ini sebagai referensi.
Ketika melihat riwayat pemilu sebelumnya tentu ini menjadi sebuah sejarah yang kelam yang pernah terjadi karena bagaimanapun juga pestapora demokrasi yang terjadi di 2019 ini membuat banyak sekali orang yang kehilangan nyawa nya akibat beberapa alasan dan salah satunya adalah efek dari kelelahan karena terlalu beratnya beban kerja yang dilimpahkan dalam pemilu mengingat ini adalah pemilu serempak. Meskipun ada beberapa konspirasi seperti menutup kecurangan atau lain-lain tetapi konfirmasi yang terjadi saat ini adalah karena faktor kelelahan dan beratnya beban kerja.
Tentu saja dengan mengacu kepada hal ini kita juga perlu khawatir dengan kondisi saat ini terlebih skema yang dilakukan dalam pemilu kali ini dan periode sebelumnya terkesan sama.
Lantas muncul pemikiran liar untuk sekarang apakah memang kejadian kelam seperti 2019 akan kembali terjadi atau apakah memang sistem pemilihan serempak ini sudah sesuai dengan kebijakan yang pas karena jika memang periode sebelumnya banyak yang meninggal karena beban kerja yang berat lantas apa bedanya sekarang karena pada akhirnya skema dan sistem pemilu saat ini tidak berbeda dengan periode 2019.
Tapi apapun itu semoga kita semua diberikan kesehatan terutama untuk mereka yang bekerja di garda terdepan pemilu sebagai petugas KPU terutama KPPS dan Panwaslu yang turun langsung ke lapangan.
As a long time hodler why do you need to be bothering yourself with watching the market? Your sole purpose is just to keep buying and don't let your attention be bothered by market activities. If your goal is to accumulate and hodl for 6 years and above, then the market timing is not something you should be bothering yourself with. You should just be concerned with getting steady flow of liquidity to inject in bitcoin. Any price you meet bitcoin when you liquidity is available you buy. Let the day traders bother themselves with the market timing.
Bitcoin market is volatile which can create different sentiments at any time among those who follow the market. Those who are committed to long-term holding would definitely do well to keep an eye on how to further diversify their portfolio. Those who understand the value of Bitcoin see the dumping of Bitcoin as an opportunity for them. Those who are short-term investors may be happy with small profits but a Bitcoin holder usually dreams big.I think it might be possible to verify with other assets such as gold or real estate that can still be done if you have very large money but disverify bitcoin with altcoins will be a funny situation in the end because we actually make our risk bigger.
If in the end our money is only sober for what to think about diversification because it would be better to just focus on what you want to achieve with your bitcoin.
With bitcoin as well rest of the altcoins every dip is an opportunity to make an investment. Very few make use of this while majority of the users just keep hold of the assets for the bull trend. To make a good profit out of bitcoin it is a must to move along with the market than just holding focusing on targeted growth.
Perhaps we can capitalize on the current market downturn, but not everyone is knowledgeable about this. When the stock market appears to be in the red, some might think it will continue, waiting for the right time to buy. Without realizing that the market turns green again, and vice versa.
Maybe we realize that taking advantage of the market is much better than waiting for the target of a bull run. However, for those who lack patience, they often experience misfortune, so they prefer long-term investments by investing without checking the changing conditions of crypto prices.
Choosing a long-term investment is a choice not a misfortune so we have to choose correctly what we want to invest in and of course bitcoin is the right place for that. we have to distinguish bitcoin from others in this case especially when talking about the whole crypto then I think it will not be too relevant to the previous discussion because the initial focus remains on bitcoin not for others.
Masalahnya adalah tidak adanya aturan khsusu alias membebaskan para caleg atau anggota dewan memasang dimanapun yang bahkan dilakukan tanpa izin justru dijadikan alasan oleh beberapa oknum yang memang menghalalkan segala cara agar mereka dikenali.
Padahal sekalipun memang tidak ada aturan khusus tentunya harus ada adab tentang bagaimana pemasangan ini dilakukan karena jika memang tanpa permisi terlebih dahulu sebenarnya itu sudah melanggar norma menurut saya.
Saya melihat kasus ini di media sosial dan bahkan memang ada beberapa video yang memperlihatkan bahwa calon anggota dewan itu mengamuk karena spanduk yang mereka pasang dicopot dengan nada intimidasi dan ancaman pelaporan kepada pihak yang berwajib dan ini salah satu yang saya lihat sebelumnya video.
Disisi lain memang tidak hanya kasus ini saja yang ramai karena ada beberapa kasus yang sama walaupun konteksnya sedikit berbeda dimana salah seorang warga di intimidasi dan akan dilaporkan kepada polisi yang mengharuskan dia meminta maaf karena mencopot stiker salah satu calon yang terpasang di rumahnya padahal itu adalah hak dirinya sendiri dengan dalih karena sebelumnya pemasangan tersebut dilakukan tanpa izin tetapi memang mereka para oknum yang memiliki kuasa dan uang justru membuat intimidasi sedemikian rupa padahal tata letak kesalahannya kita sudah tahu siapa yang memulai.
Cabut Stiker Caleg di Rumahnya Sendiri, Pria ini Malah Diancam akan Dipolisikan
Kita memang bebas melakukan promosi dimanapun dengan bentuk apapun entah itu stiker, baliho spanduk atau yang lainnya sesuai dengan ketentuan dan aturan yang ditetapkan pemilu tetapi sejatinya kita juga harus memiliki tatakrama setidaknya perizinan terlebih dahulu sebelum melakukannya tetapi untuk sekarang manners seperti ini sudah hilang akibat beberapa oknum yang sebenarnya tingkah nya tidak dibenarkan.
Sebenarnya dalam hal ini ada beberapa aturan tentang baliho, stiker, spanduk atau alat kampanye lain yang memang sudah ada dalam undang-undang serta pemasangannya pun sudah diatur dalam beberapa kondisi seperti terkait dengan statemen bawaslu yang notabene adalah pengawas yang mengawasi ketertiban jalannya pemilu dimana pemasangan stiker, spanduk dan lain-lain jika memang berada di rumah atau dekat rumah itu harus izin dari yang memiliki tempat atau rumah hanya saja masih banyak saat ini yang memang tidak menaati aturan tersebut.Padahal sekalipun memang tidak ada aturan khusus tentunya harus ada adab tentang bagaimana pemasangan ini dilakukan karena jika memang tanpa permisi terlebih dahulu sebenarnya itu sudah melanggar norma menurut saya.
Saya melihat kasus ini di media sosial dan bahkan memang ada beberapa video yang memperlihatkan bahwa calon anggota dewan itu mengamuk karena spanduk yang mereka pasang dicopot dengan nada intimidasi dan ancaman pelaporan kepada pihak yang berwajib dan ini salah satu yang saya lihat sebelumnya video.
Disisi lain memang tidak hanya kasus ini saja yang ramai karena ada beberapa kasus yang sama walaupun konteksnya sedikit berbeda dimana salah seorang warga di intimidasi dan akan dilaporkan kepada polisi yang mengharuskan dia meminta maaf karena mencopot stiker salah satu calon yang terpasang di rumahnya padahal itu adalah hak dirinya sendiri dengan dalih karena sebelumnya pemasangan tersebut dilakukan tanpa izin tetapi memang mereka para oknum yang memiliki kuasa dan uang justru membuat intimidasi sedemikian rupa padahal tata letak kesalahannya kita sudah tahu siapa yang memulai.
Cabut Stiker Caleg di Rumahnya Sendiri, Pria ini Malah Diancam akan Dipolisikan
Kita memang bebas melakukan promosi dimanapun dengan bentuk apapun entah itu stiker, baliho spanduk atau yang lainnya sesuai dengan ketentuan dan aturan yang ditetapkan pemilu tetapi sejatinya kita juga harus memiliki tatakrama setidaknya perizinan terlebih dahulu sebelum melakukannya tetapi untuk sekarang manners seperti ini sudah hilang akibat beberapa oknum yang sebenarnya tingkah nya tidak dibenarkan.
Ini bukan salah dari aturan tetapi kesalahan terletak di mereka yang memang tidak menaati aturan karena seperti yang anda sebutkan sebelumnya, segalanya akan di halalkan termasuk cara-cara yang salah sekalipun agar mereka bisa melaksanakan rencanan mereka dengan baik untuk kekuasaan yang mereka incar dan memang kita terlalu baik dengan mengatakan hal ini hanya "oknum" padahal memang hal seperti ini seharusnya di tindak lebih keras tetapi justru seolah di lindungi karena tidak ada tindak lanjut lebih jauh kecuali jika memang beberapa pemberitaan viral yang mengahruskan mereka "para oknum" mengharuskan klarifikasi dan cuci tangan.
Beberapa contoh yang anda masukan dalam sumber jelas ini menunjukan masih lemahnya pemahaman tentang aturan dan memang hal seperti ini sudah seperti lumrah bahkan memang mungkin selentingan nyeleneh aturan ada hanya untuk dilanggar pun itu benar-benar terjadi padahal itu adalah bentuk sarkasme.
Cukup miris dengan yang terjadi di beberapa kasus dimana justru masyarakat biasa di intimidasi dan dipaksa untuk meminta maaf padahal mereka hanya menuntut haknya dan memperlihatkan kondisi yang salah dalam beberapa promosi yang dilakukan para caleg. Disisi lain sepertinya memang ada yang salah dalam yang terjadi sekarang padahal mereka harus mengayomi masyarakat agar bisa meyakinkan bahwa mereka itu adalah contoh wakil yang baik tetapi yang terjadi dalam beberapa kasus yang anda sebutkan justru ini berkebalikan. masih menjadi calon saja mereka sudah semena-mena dan berusaha melakukan intimidasi sedemikian rupa bagaimana jika mereka sudah duduk di kursi parlemen.
Hanya saja sampai saat ini ketika memang tidak ada aturan khusus tentang pemasangan justru ini menjadi sumber masalah dimana banyak sekali dari mereka para oknum yang memasang se enaknya di rumah-rumah warga tanpa se izin yang punya rumah atau beberapa tempat lain dengan sama tanpa seizin terlebih dahulu padahal ini harus diperhatikan karena menurut saya sekalipun memang pesta pemilu adalah pesta rakyat tetapi tetap saja harus ada beberapa kondisi dimana adab dan norma harus di dahulukan sebagai bentuk kesopanan.
Memang sekarang ini banyak sekali masalah yang terjadi terhadap pemasangan alat peraga ini dan saya ingin sedikit bercerita tentang yang terjadi di daerah saya beberapa waktu lalu dimana ada sebuah permasalahan yang terjadi akibat baliho salah satu caleg di tutupi dengan baliho dari partai lain. Ini menjadi suguhan yang menarik karena ketika tidak ada aturan resmi dan segala cara akan dilakukan maka tidak jarang hal seperti ini pasti terjadi.
In this case even though I like bitcoin and am still arguably a pro in it but what you are doing actually in my opinion is too aggressively.
When saying you are financially ready to invest does not mean you have to sell the livestock that your parents have because indirectly this does not indicate that you are ready and you are only trying to sell the livestock you have and the money is converted to bitcoin investment.
Although it does sound good but at least you also have to think further about what you are doing because in my opinion someone can be said to be financially ready to invest is to use some of the money they set aside or that is not too used to invest not that it sells some of the assets that you or your parents have to invest.
This is the same as you trying to convince your parents who are laymen to impose the will that you want to do in bitcoin and indirectly I think this does not mean financially ready because you only see the positive aspects but do not pay too much attention to the impact and risks that exist when you invest.
When saying you are financially ready to invest does not mean you have to sell the livestock that your parents have because indirectly this does not indicate that you are ready and you are only trying to sell the livestock you have and the money is converted to bitcoin investment.
Although it does sound good but at least you also have to think further about what you are doing because in my opinion someone can be said to be financially ready to invest is to use some of the money they set aside or that is not too used to invest not that it sells some of the assets that you or your parents have to invest.
This is the same as you trying to convince your parents who are laymen to impose the will that you want to do in bitcoin and indirectly I think this does not mean financially ready because you only see the positive aspects but do not pay too much attention to the impact and risks that exist when you invest.
Ada beberapa kasus yang terjadi termasuk salah satunya adalah yang viral di media sosial baru-baru ini tentang seorang yang memasang spanduk yang ditempatkan di depan etalase sebuah konter yang justru itu menimbulkan masalah. pasalnya itu menutup semua produk yang justru dirasa merugikan pemilik konter yang lebih parahnya adalah ketika ini viral dan mencoba untuk dicopot justru yang memasang tidak terima hal itu padahal sudah jelas itu melanggar karena ini jelas mengganggu pemilik toko atau konter dan para oknum seperti inilah yang justru merusak citra karena sekalipun memang kita bebas memasang apapun dan dimanapun tetapi tentu harus ada perijzinan dulu apalagi jika memang tempat yang digunakan untuk pemasangan baliho atau spanduk itu tempat pribadi.
Masalahnya adalah tidak adanya aturan khsusu alias membebaskan para caleg atau anggota dewan memasang dimanapun yang bahkan dilakukan tanpa izin justru dijadikan alasan oleh beberapa oknum yang memang menghalalkan segala cara agar mereka dikenali.Padahal sekalipun memang tidak ada aturan khusus tentunya harus ada adab tentang bagaimana pemasangan ini dilakukan karena jika memang tanpa permisi terlebih dahulu sebenarnya itu sudah melanggar norma menurut saya.
Saya melihat kasus ini di media sosial dan bahkan memang ada beberapa video yang memperlihatkan bahwa calon anggota dewan itu mengamuk karena spanduk yang mereka pasang dicopot dengan nada intimidasi dan ancaman pelaporan kepada pihak yang berwajib dan ini salah satu yang saya lihat sebelumnya video.
Disisi lain memang tidak hanya kasus ini saja yang ramai karena ada beberapa kasus yang sama walaupun konteksnya sedikit berbeda dimana salah seorang warga di intimidasi dan akan dilaporkan kepada polisi yang mengharuskan dia meminta maaf karena mencopot stiker salah satu calon yang terpasang di rumahnya padahal itu adalah hak dirinya sendiri dengan dalih karena sebelumnya pemasangan tersebut dilakukan tanpa izin tetapi memang mereka para oknum yang memiliki kuasa dan uang justru membuat intimidasi sedemikian rupa padahal tata letak kesalahannya kita sudah tahu siapa yang memulai.
Cabut Stiker Caleg di Rumahnya Sendiri, Pria ini Malah Diancam akan Dipolisikan
Kita memang bebas melakukan promosi dimanapun dengan bentuk apapun entah itu stiker, baliho spanduk atau yang lainnya sesuai dengan ketentuan dan aturan yang ditetapkan pemilu tetapi sejatinya kita juga harus memiliki tatakrama setidaknya perizinan terlebih dahulu sebelum melakukannya tetapi untuk sekarang manners seperti ini sudah hilang akibat beberapa oknum yang sebenarnya tingkah nya tidak dibenarkan.
Re: Liciknya Anggota DPR Boleh Menjabat Lebih dari 2 Periode!
Inilah dimana uang dan kekuasaan bisa merubah apapun yang bahkan tidak bisa dilakukan. Pada akhirnya Privilage dalam hal ini menjadi sebuah acuan dimana hal yang tidak seharusnya terjadi masih sangat bisa terjadi yang membuat ini menjadi sebuah hal yang sangat lumrah terjadi di indonesia karena memang politik di Indonesia sekarang adalah ladang basah untuk mereka para pencari cuan yang memiliki privilage uang dan kekuasaan sebelumnya agar menciptakan dinasti mereka sendiri.
Mereka terkadang tidak mengerti tentang apa tugas yang mereka akan lakukan karena tujuannya bukan untuk itu tetapi memang untuk kesejahteraan mereka sendiri.
Saat ini bahkan sedang ramai di media sosial tentang salah satu calon yang bernama Rasyid Rajasa. dia adalah salah satu politikus ternama hatta Rajasa yang memang saat ini menjadi salah satu Caleg dari PAN yang memang beberapa waktu lalu membuat baligo yang terkesan nyeleneh. Tetapi bukan itu yang membuat dia menjadi perbincangan karena pasalnya dia pernah di tetapkan sebagai tersangka kecelakaan yang mengakibatkan 2 orang meninggal dan sudah dijadikan tersangka dengan vonis diancam 6 tahun walaupun pada akhirnya dia dijatuhi hukuman beberapa bulan saja.
Tetapi sejak ditetapkan sebagai tersangka dia bahkan tidak pernah dipenjara karena beberapa alasan yang sebenarnya tidak masuk akal dan lucunya sekarang dia menjadi salah satu kandidat calon dari PAN.
Ini jelas menjadi bukti bahwa privilage, uang dan kekuasaan itu penting yang membuat sesuatu yang bahkan tidak pernah mungkin terjadi langsung menjadi mungkin.
Mereka terkadang tidak mengerti tentang apa tugas yang mereka akan lakukan karena tujuannya bukan untuk itu tetapi memang untuk kesejahteraan mereka sendiri.
Saat ini bahkan sedang ramai di media sosial tentang salah satu calon yang bernama Rasyid Rajasa. dia adalah salah satu politikus ternama hatta Rajasa yang memang saat ini menjadi salah satu Caleg dari PAN yang memang beberapa waktu lalu membuat baligo yang terkesan nyeleneh. Tetapi bukan itu yang membuat dia menjadi perbincangan karena pasalnya dia pernah di tetapkan sebagai tersangka kecelakaan yang mengakibatkan 2 orang meninggal dan sudah dijadikan tersangka dengan vonis diancam 6 tahun walaupun pada akhirnya dia dijatuhi hukuman beberapa bulan saja.
Tetapi sejak ditetapkan sebagai tersangka dia bahkan tidak pernah dipenjara karena beberapa alasan yang sebenarnya tidak masuk akal dan lucunya sekarang dia menjadi salah satu kandidat calon dari PAN.
Ini jelas menjadi bukti bahwa privilage, uang dan kekuasaan itu penting yang membuat sesuatu yang bahkan tidak pernah mungkin terjadi langsung menjadi mungkin.
⭐ Merited by BigBos (1)
Actually in this situation I think it is optional. We do need to learn about what bitcoin is and how to invest in bitcoin but we don't need to learn too much about investment theory if we really want to start because in the end this kind of theory will only make you struggle in learning but not dare to try.
I do not deny that learning is something very important but you should also try to directly practice what you learn because after all we can also still learn by doing so that the theory we learn is directly in the form of action in practice so that you know that what you learn is true or not.
I do not deny that learning is something very important but you should also try to directly practice what you learn because after all we can also still learn by doing so that the theory we learn is directly in the form of action in practice so that you know that what you learn is true or not.
How can you be motivated to invest in Bitcoin if you don't know about Bitcoin investing? Don't you know that the more experienced you are with Bitcoin the more successful you are. Because you don't know what to do about Bitcoin? There are ideas. Because of course our education about bitcoin is very important because if I don't have knowledge about bitcoin then investment is definitely ricks. Only after knowing the information should we awaken our ability to take risks, and invest in Bitcoin to the best of our ability as we move forward into the future. So I definitely prioritize learning about Bitcoin and gaining knowledge about investing.
What I mean is that we don't need the whole of bitcoin because we only need the basics to get started. as for after starting to be in bitcoin we learn further to increase the knowledge we have in bitcoin so that we can run investments that are run in bitcoin while continuing to learn bitcoin.
This is intended so that we don't have to wait long and lose momentum to be in bitcoin because in the end when we only focus on learning bitcoin without taking action in investing what we have is just an understanding and theory but not accompanied by practice that can make you more able to understand because the experience of running practice and talking about theory alone will be very different in terms of results.
Knowledge is important but to start being in bitcoin and investing in it we don't need to master all aspects of bitcoin because in the end when we have started the aspects that exist to support being in bitcoin to make it even better we can find it on the way in the process.
Investing in Bitcoin requires a lot of learning about investing. The more we study about investing the easier it seems to me. Studying specific topics is very important It is not just Bitcoin investing that you are asked to study but for every situation that you are in your business or situation that you are in, you have to study a lot.
Actually in this situation I think it is optional. We do need to learn about what bitcoin is and how to invest in bitcoin but we don't need to learn too much about investment theory if we really want to start because in the end this kind of theory will only make you struggle in learning but not dare to try.I do not deny that learning is something very important but you should also try to directly practice what you learn because after all we can also still learn by doing so that the theory we learn is directly in the form of action in practice so that you know that what you learn is true or not.
HODL does not mean "hold on for dear life"
That was some no coiner gambler who came up with that characterization of HODL in order to wrongly imply some level of gambling and/or panic/stress that a HODLer needs to have."<<<<<<<
That was some no coiner gambler who came up with that characterization of HODL in order to wrongly imply some level of gambling and/or panic/stress that a HODLer needs to have."<<<<<<<
I wonder where they got the idea from that holding means "hold on for dear life" I mean how did dey arrive at this conclusion, though we know bitcoin is more of long term holding but how can someone hold bitcoin without having a plan from the start or along his/her accumulation journey, they say " if you fail to plan you plan you to fail" so a holder without a goal to achieve with his/her bitcoin by the end of their accumulation journey is either making investment for their children/next of kin, that is if they have his mnemonic phrase and private key or they are just making investment to keep the system running if anything happens to them.
In addition, actually when talking about strategy, of course there must be a mature strategy from the start because if in the end you take the wrong step when taking a strategy at the beginning you are in bitcoin then you may not be optimal in terms of the results we want to achieve. I will take an example here. Suppose we want to do DCA but the nominal that we set to do DCA at the beginning is too imposing because it does not match your economic situation (greater than your income) then indeed it will not be optimal because the DCA that you do can be stopped halfway because the nominal that you determine to do DCA is greater than income and actually hampers your economy.
⭐ Merited by JayJuanGee (1)
Actually in this case when talking about investment it is a choice and indeed if we can do it then why not.
Regardless of whether or not fiat is safe at this time we must realize that fiat is the greatest power but investment can indeed be a necessity without leaving fiat because after all for everyday life fiat is still very much needed.
I will not leave fiat in this case because it is also impossible because fiat still has full power, especially to support life but for investment, especially in bitcoin, it is a different story. Do not merely when you are in bitcoin you forget and consider fiat bad because in the end when looking at the situation in everyday life fiat is still a primary factor if categorized as a necessity.
Regardless of whether or not fiat is safe at this time we must realize that fiat is the greatest power but investment can indeed be a necessity without leaving fiat because after all for everyday life fiat is still very much needed.
I will not leave fiat in this case because it is also impossible because fiat still has full power, especially to support life but for investment, especially in bitcoin, it is a different story. Do not merely when you are in bitcoin you forget and consider fiat bad because in the end when looking at the situation in everyday life fiat is still a primary factor if categorized as a necessity.
In this part of your post, your ideas sound a little lost Fauderz, even though I think that I understand what you are saying in regards to making sure to keep some feet in the fiat world, even while investing into BTC, and even on a personal level, I don't have any problem with the idea of keeping a foot in both worlds, but your comment's seeming attachment to fiat seems like it could be a bit problematic, as if you don't really understand what bitcoin is offering..... but from the rest of your post, I can see that you do seem to understand that bitcoin is a potentially powerful investment.. so what is it? Do you consider that there is anything wrong with establishing a bitcoin position and continuing to operate in the fiat world, so it is not like your choice to invest into bitcoin would result in your having to have to give up fiat? You seem to understand that, so why be so lovey-dovey in the way that you describe fiat? Sure fiat exists, but we don't need to be lovely-dovey about fiat, since fiat has a lot of problems and hopefully our investment into bitcoin allows us to have some non-correlated exposure to money that is not so controlled and manipulated by state actors, who might not even have bad intentions but the system that they are working within has gotten away from them, so they have to engage in deceptions, lies and desperations to try to keep normies trapped into such a controlling system.. especially ways that fiat is currently being manipulated to control people, which maybe had always been somewhat true and the powers that be do not really like normies using cash, either.
Bitcoin I use as an investment tool for my future but fiat I use to support today's needs. As long as both are still useful then I will continue to use both so there is no concept of wrong and right between bitcoin and fiat and they are also made not to blame each other.
Therefore, we must have a careful strategy from the beginning so that in the future the needs we need and the ongoing investment (DCA) are not disturbed. 20 percent is not the initial benchmark because if in the end if we are not able to be consistent in the future, why force something that is difficult for us to guarantee so that initial management of finances and planning in investment must be decided carefully from the start.
If we set too much from the beginning, for example 30 percent or 20 percent but are not able to be consistent, it will also be not optimal so it needs further emphasis on whether we are able to invest with an amount of 30 or 20 percent for the long term or not. If in the end this is burdensome then reduce it so that you are able to be consistent but on the other hand you are also able to support the needs of the life you live.
If we set too much from the beginning, for example 30 percent or 20 percent but are not able to be consistent, it will also be not optimal so it needs further emphasis on whether we are able to invest with an amount of 30 or 20 percent for the long term or not. If in the end this is burdensome then reduce it so that you are able to be consistent but on the other hand you are also able to support the needs of the life you live.
I agree with everything you say here Fauderz, and I would just add that it is likely better to find an amount that is sustainable that is lower than to pick too high an amount, but at the same time, if someone is really on top of their cashflow situation (and they have an emergency fund in place and have even projected out their cashflows for 6-18 months), they may well have enough information about their situation to really be aggressive and to push their DCA to its maximum amount every time they get paid or every month or however they have it set up and decide to fluctuate every paycheck between 10% and 30%, so it is not like they have to be exactly consistent, and just because exchanges allow people to set up automatic DCAs, I am not really much of a fan of the automatic DCA, yet at the same time, many times in the real world, people don't want to have to manually make their BTC buys on a weekly, bi-weekly or monthly basis.
Because indeed I still feel for now rather than we force trying to buy too high but instead it interferes with other needs it will actually make ourselves not be optimal and will actually mess up the initial plan so it doesn't matter if the DCA is lowered a little like 10-20 percent but it can guarantee you are able to do it well rather than forcing the will with 30 percent as a benchmark but instead it ruins the scheme that you will make for the future.
⭐ Merited by JayJuanGee (1)
It all depends on yourself and I don't think it's necessary to feel that your country alone has problems in the economy because for now almost all countries feel the same way but that's not the point, I think the point that needs to be emphasized in the current conditions is how you manage your money because in the end the current benchmark is not to the country but to yourself who must survive with all the circumstances that occur.
As long as you believe and want to invest in bitcoin then you definitely know what you will do. 30 percent of income if it feels too big then you can reduce it to 20% or 10% according to your own strength.
Many here are married but in the end they can still do DCA consistently. This indicates that belief can make us think more broadly and not only fixated on economic conditions because in the end when good management is done and you know how much income and expense from your income actually it can be a gap to make some changes if you want to invest and it depends on yourself whether you want or not to invest.
As long as you believe and want to invest in bitcoin then you definitely know what you will do. 30 percent of income if it feels too big then you can reduce it to 20% or 10% according to your own strength.
Many here are married but in the end they can still do DCA consistently. This indicates that belief can make us think more broadly and not only fixated on economic conditions because in the end when good management is done and you know how much income and expense from your income actually it can be a gap to make some changes if you want to invest and it depends on yourself whether you want or not to invest.
A man must have a future, so he must participate in investments thinking about the future. Because my country is dealing with a lot of economic conditions (all countries are suffering from economic problems all over the world) the bank money is being taken over by the government. Currently holding fiat currencies is not safe at all, so investing in bitcoins is a must. Investing in Bitcoin is of course the claimant to the property itself. And those who do not have savings, it is better to invest 10% to 15% of their monthly income in DCA method according to their monthly or weekly income. Because investing in Bitcoin will definitely increase your wealth, it is more profitable to invest than to keep your savings.
Regardless of whether or not fiat is safe at this time we must realize that fiat is the greatest power but investment can indeed be a necessity without leaving fiat because after all for everyday life fiat is still very much needed.
I will not leave fiat in this case because it is also impossible because fiat still has full power, especially to support life but for investment, especially in bitcoin, it is a different story. Do not merely when you are in bitcoin you forget and consider fiat bad because in the end when looking at the situation in everyday life fiat is still a primary factor if categorized as a necessity.
As long as you believe and want to invest in bitcoin then you definitely know what you will do. 30 percent of income if it feels too big then you can reduce it to 20% or 10% according to your own strength.
Many here are married but in the end they can still do DCA consistently. This indicates that belief can make us think more broadly and not only fixated on economic conditions because in the end when good management is done and you know how much income and expense from your income actually it can be a gap to make some changes if you want to invest and it depends on yourself whether you want or not to invest.
If we set too much from the beginning, for example 30 percent or 20 percent but are not able to be consistent, it will also be not optimal so it needs further emphasis on whether we are able to invest with an amount of 30 or 20 percent for the long term or not. If in the end this is burdensome then reduce it so that you are able to be consistent but on the other hand you are also able to support the needs of the life you live.
⭐ Merited by JayJuanGee (1)
Although it sound interesting but hard to achieve that amount of %30 on regular basis expecialy on DCA strategy. Considering the responsibilities in the family. for example a country like mine, if you continue like this you will put yourself in financial jopady. For me I think %20 will be good to go. but if one can develop and nuture that characteristics, I think it will go a long way if there are other means of lively hood.
As long as you believe and want to invest in bitcoin then you definitely know what you will do. 30 percent of income if it feels too big then you can reduce it to 20% or 10% according to your own strength.
Many here are married but in the end they can still do DCA consistently. This indicates that belief can make us think more broadly and not only fixated on economic conditions because in the end when good management is done and you know how much income and expense from your income actually it can be a gap to make some changes if you want to invest and it depends on yourself whether you want or not to invest.
I think there is no need for newbies to start investing after knowing everything. Just knowing how to buy and hold bitcoins, you can start holding bitcoins. You don't need to know everything about bitcoin right now, you just need to buy now and start with safety. And then you slowly get to know everything about Bitcoin.
But with this you will be someone who is naive because in the end when only buying bitcoin and holding bitcoin without knowing the basic science of what bitcoin is the same as buying an item which is locked in a chest without knowing what is in the chest.We must know what we are buying, the benefits we will get and the risks when we buy anything. Likewise with bitcoin when we buy bitcoin we must know what bitcoin is, its functions and uses as well as our benefits when buying bitcoin for what and the risks we will face like what when we buy and store bitcoin.
Many people feel they are deceived because they buy bitcoin and sell at a loss because they don't know what they are buying and don't want to learn more about what we are buying. That is not the fault of bitcoin but we ourselves are naive because we only follow your hype about bitcoin and follow to buy but do not realize that the risk we have to take is actually very large.
⭐ Merited by JayJuanGee (1)
https://www.talkimg.com/image/RcOUG
the FTX case has widened again and has led to several well-known celebrities and athletes now being questioned and charged for allegedly supporting FTX.
In some of the articles I've read there are at least a few names such as Naomi Osaka, former baseball superstar David Ortiz, and Kevin O'Leary currently being investigated for their involvement with Sam and FTX in addition to Tom Brady and Steph Curry are also now starting to be investigated for receiving money from Sam (which came from stolen customer money) for their endorsement deals in the form of FTX paltform advertisements.
Tom Brady reportedly received $55 million for just 20 hours of work advertising FTX for 3 years and $35 million for Steph Curry who did the same for 3 years.
https://fortune.com/crypto/2023/10/02/sam-bankman-fried-tom-brady-gisele-bundchen-michael-lewis-60-minutes/
https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/sam-bankman-fried-tom-brady-ftx-60-minutes-michael-lewis/
the FTX case has widened again and has led to several well-known celebrities and athletes now being questioned and charged for allegedly supporting FTX.
In some of the articles I've read there are at least a few names such as Naomi Osaka, former baseball superstar David Ortiz, and Kevin O'Leary currently being investigated for their involvement with Sam and FTX in addition to Tom Brady and Steph Curry are also now starting to be investigated for receiving money from Sam (which came from stolen customer money) for their endorsement deals in the form of FTX paltform advertisements.
Tom Brady reportedly received $55 million for just 20 hours of work advertising FTX for 3 years and $35 million for Steph Curry who did the same for 3 years.
https://fortune.com/crypto/2023/10/02/sam-bankman-fried-tom-brady-gisele-bundchen-michael-lewis-60-minutes/
https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/sam-bankman-fried-tom-brady-ftx-60-minutes-michael-lewis/
Agama menjadi sumber petunjuk bagi semua ummat yang meyakininya. Kaidah agama memang penting dalam segala aspek kehidupan kita yang hidup di negara yang punya aturan. Berbagai hal yang negatif seperti tingginya tingkat perjudian online dan meningkatnya kasus bully yang terjadi di sekolah dan banyak kasus lain yang tidak seharusnya terjadi, tidak serta merta dapat diarahkan dalangnya kepada agama karena tujuan agama bukan untuk itu (kejahatan) melainkan sebagai petunjuk. Semua fenemona yang terjadi yang sedang kita bicarakan ini murni karena penganut agama yang tidak menerapkan sepenuhnya norma dan etika beragama dalam menjalani kehidupan didalam negara yang tertata dengan aturan.
Sebenarnya maksud dari yang ingin saya sampaikan bukan kepada apa dalang dibalik itu semua karena ketika berbicara tentang agama kita juga tahu agama adalah sesuatu yang sakral dan benar (untuk semua penganutnya) sehingga tidak ada yang meragukan hal itu hanya saja dengan kondisi dimana kita hidup dengan agama sebagai patokan jujur ini tidak terlalu mencerminkan kita sebagai hidup dalam agama karena pada akhirnya ketika mengacu kepada hal ini agama hanya dijadikan sebagai kedok dan hanya sebagai sebuah ferivikasi bahwa kita tidak dianggap berbeda dari yang lain tetapi sikap dan sifat kita sangat jauh dari hal itu.Untuk kesekian kalinya ane bilang kalau survei yang model likert itu paling bisa mengukur PERSEPSI doang. Artinya menurut dia, dia itu religius, padahal belom tentu 
Menurut dia, dia itu religius, walaupun masih suka korupsi, judi, ngebully orang, dsb., tetep dia itu religius karena udah rajin beribadah.
Ga ada survey yang bisa ngukur religiusitas seseorang, karena yang mengukur itu yang di Atas.
Pada akhirnya agama dijadikan sebuah tameng agar kita dianggap sebagai orang yang beragama tetapi disisi lain kita juga justru jauh dari aturan agama yang harusnya kita lakukan. dalam hal ini saya juga tidak ingin menjadi seseorang yang dianggap religius karena memang kita tidak bisa menganggap diri kita religius mengingat dalam pribahasa diatas langit masih ada langit hanya saja jika melihat kondisi saat ini saya rasa sulit untuk membuat benteng diri karena pada akhirnya kata agama sekarang ini hanya dianggap sebagai remeh untuk sebagian orang. Bukan berarti semua seperti itu pasti masih ada banyak sekali yang menjunjung norma dan agama sebagai patokan hanya saja itu tidak akan menutup pandangan bahwa di indonesia saat ini agama hanya dijadikan sebagai kedok untuk sebagian orang.Menurut dia, dia itu religius, walaupun masih suka korupsi, judi, ngebully orang, dsb., tetep dia itu religius karena udah rajin beribadah.
Ga ada survey yang bisa ngukur religiusitas seseorang, karena yang mengukur itu yang di Atas.
Satu pertanyaan saya, apakah ini berkaitan langsung dengan pendidikan di kita masih kurang dibandingkan dengan negara negara lain? dan menurut saya itu berkaitan langsung. Sebab saya melihat penomena dimana di dalam pendidikan pun masih banyak kasus kasus yang tidak mencerminkan pendidikan. Seperti misalnya, sekolah yang seharusnya gratis dari biaya apapun masih memungut biaya dengan alasan alasan yang mereka buat sendiri, seperti infak lah, uang bangunan lah, dan lain lain. *Saya tidak mengatakan semua sekolah, namun masih banyak yang melakukan praktek itu.
Pendidikan adalah pondasi dasar, terutama dalam pendidikan akhlak, namun fakta yang terjadi dilapangan, kebiasaan buruk di pupuk dari hal terkecil.
Ini sudah jelas bahwa pendidikan di negara kita masih sangat jauh tertinggal. Contoh saja mungkin dari kurikulum yang diberlakukan di indonesi dimulai dari kurikulum 2006 (KTSP), Kurikulum 2013 (Kurtilas) dan sekarang kurikulum merdeka ini hanya bentuk adaptasi dari kurikulum dari negara lain yang bahkan ada yang sudah di tinggalkan sejak lama (dari sisi akademik) adapun ketika dari sisi permasalahan yang terjadi ini sebenarnya murni dari moral yang memang kurang serta norma yang perlahan di tinggalkan sehingga akan sangat sulit mengatasi permalasahan yang terjadi saat ini.Pendidikan adalah pondasi dasar, terutama dalam pendidikan akhlak, namun fakta yang terjadi dilapangan, kebiasaan buruk di pupuk dari hal terkecil.