The button bug could very likely be intentionally. We can all image who is getting benefit from the 6537.61-2344.5= 4193.11, the unregulated Bitfinex exchange.

Aug 31st, 2015.

Bitfinex is offline again.




Rumor goes that in webchat groups,

There is similar long time of history, when everything with mtgox is right. However, from some time the mtgox started to show very risky signals, and less than one year later, it collapsed.

Below is written by the user on Reddit whose ID is "elux". When I submit this, it has get 26 up votes already.

No, he was withdrawing the Bitcoin.

I have been in the Bitcoin community since 2011 and now I smell something that is not right about Bitfinex recently. I believe it is the right time to start this post, to let the community to have a full records of the ongoing history. I also want to start this post to let the whole community watch out for this risk. People are still using Bitfinex, and the trading volume of Bitfinex is still among the largest. However, I have already find the clue of fraud, and the evidence of amateur.

This unregulated exchange is a huge risk for the Bitcoin economy. We need to let more people to know about the risk associated with this exchange, and we should let other traders know.

I am living in China and getting communicated a lot with the bitcoin community there. On 14th Aug, the COO of btc123.com, Chandler Guo, has removed bitfinex from their list of quotations.


Chandler shared a very important piece of information in a Wechat group, indicate that a China arbitrage trading team have find issues when withdrawing bitcoin from the Bitfinex exchange. Soon, I myself get confirmed from the leader of the team, Mr. Zhao, confirmed it. He said that he had to "rummaged around" the whole Bitfinex contact list and trying every way to have a respond, and then got the Bitcoin withdraw done. The bitfinex give him an excuse of something with the evil U.S. government seizing their fund. This has never happened before. Mr Zhao showed us the email:



Evil U.S. government are seizing our fund. The withdraw is slow. Signs of market manipulation. Doesn't it looks pretty familiar? When we find signs of similar problems with mtgox, mtgox is not shutting down immediately. The whole situation of mtgox evolved in about 10 months time.

Now it is the time to be very cautious for us to look into what is happening with Bitfinex. And for those who are not trading there, I believe you will have a good time to look at the show in the next months.

If your power is free, the best strategy for you is to buy cheap second handed miners to deploy yourself, but not hosting.

Yes, the power cost can be a great influence. Sometimes a zero worth of junk miner for you, is something that can generate very good cash flow , and is money printing machines. So selling the used miners at the right timing and to the right buyer is a kind of art.

I think they take the "auto-Rebuy" feature. If we can re-invest the proceeds, it may reach much higher APR than 12.73%, but I have not done the model yet.

Sometimes for the miner, the best strategy is to run the miners that already in hands and not to buy any new miners. Only buy the miners that is best for you. For a home miner the electricity cost is high and noise is a pain, so we should buy the high efficiency mining rigs. But for large scale miners, the cost of electricity maybe low and noise level is not a concern, they may have better tolerence with the old chips and not so sexy power efficiency. 

It is very interesting that the FDSOI process is able to let the chip running at this super voltage, which is good for promoting the efficiency. Not every process will allow the chip to run at this voltage. What is the hashrate for the chip when it is running at 0.45V?


What is voltage when the chip is running at 152GH/s?

At the end day of the PACMiC, Bitmain will take away the miners and mined till the end. Bitmain only share the mining profit with the PACMiC buyers in the beginning months. After the buyer get their investment paid back, Bitmain owns nothing against the buyers. I think that is how they earn the money.

BtcLtcNmc's claim is the truth.

It must contain some double spent tx, but when it is recorded in the main chain, you don't have to worry about it.

Yes.

Nice to see the picture. Good luck in your future bitcoin life!

Cloud mining service has its end written in the contract. But the drawdown of the bitcoin exchange rate make it faster than expected. And the speculative market and the greedy of the cloud mining service providers stop the price of contract goes down. As the cloud mining contract buyers cannot get the contract at a low enough price, usually the investors who hold the contract in long term cannot get profitable.

Buy a cloud mining contract at reasonable price (very important) from reliable provider will still be a choice of Bitcoin investment.

It is good news that Bitstamp recover the operation again, but they still need to do audit again to show they have 100% reserve for the users' fund. It is very likely a mtgox 2.0 if they cannot provide enough evidence they have equity to cover the loss.

呵呵，是意淫贴还是强帖，引用存档，过年见分晓。