["hip","hip"]

(hip hip array!)

Prove the recent testing and development have not resolved the sync issues as you claim please.

The proof you are requesting will be made available to you and everyone else in just a few weeks.

The ability to scale can easily be tested by adding more nodes to the network. Whilst testing we started with a base number of nodes. As the tests scaled up (we added more nodes) the capability of the network was indeed very close to linear.

Again you do not have to believe me, the proof will be made available to you and everyone else in just a few weeks.

Personal attacks? Not from me. If you mistook any of my previous statements as a personal attack I believe you're somewhat over sensitive.

That's it? The time period doesn't float your boat and your greedy? So you're still having to find something negative to say instead of something like "Isn't that a crypto first" or "Damn that takes some balls" or even "Not bad, but if it was me I would have (enter constructive criticism here eg:- made a longer time frame and higher bounties)".

starik69, please supply current proof to the contrary of what I am saying. All you are spouting so far is old inaccurate info that can now only be considered FUD.
I have been a part of the eMunie team for well over a year, I am in the development team private chat 24/7 and am up to speed with what does and does not work. I am happy to supply unclassified information with as much reason and accuracy as possible. You however are being unreasonable in your responses. You essentially are calling people liars for supplying information that is accurate without first doing any reasonable research into your replies to supply current proof of your claims.

Personally I do not care if you believe me or not,  maybe instead of focusing your negativity at eMunie you could do something a little more constructive with your time.

Maybe if you have the skills you could apply them to our bounty: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=772582

I just emphasized the operative part of your post. Yes there "was" a problem to start, this has been resolved during testing and development.

Firstly no, Dan has not disproved CAP theorem. The use of a block tree means that guaranteeing Consistency (all nodes see the same data at the same time) is not required. So long as a portion of nodes see a portion of the same data at the same time all is good.

Secondly, block tree's allow HIGH Partition tolerance because a block tree is allowed to be partitioned, (or forked in lay terms).

Hence the only guarantee we need to provide as per CAP theorem is availability.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAP_theorem

You clearly do not understand the Block Tree design that Dan has explained numerous times over the past year+. For example "fork problems?"; Block Trees are designed to fork, it makes the system far more secure and will lead to a lighter wallet resource wise. Less data to process and store makes syncing less of an issue than you seem to think it is.

Yea tests have never been of any use to indicate real world performance for anything. o.0

Nobody has got anything yet as it is still in beta. You're over jumping the gun a little don't you think?

I have been a part of the beta and founder team for well over a year and to be perfectly honest all the new "innovative" stuff that has turned up in the past 12 months throughout the crypto world I first saw discussed and thrashed out on the Emunie shout box long before they turned up in the real world. The vast majority of those ideas and the way to implement them to my knowledge were actually originally brought up by Dan and thrashed out by the team. The man is a machine, put your jealousy away please it is disgusting.

wow nice assumption people. No, the project is very much alive and getting closer to release.

"The reason why the genesis block mining reward transaction can not be spent is because the reference bitcoin client doesn't add it to the list of known transactions at startup. If it were a normal block that would happen, but it's not a normal block and doesn't get loaded like a normal block would. Thus any attempt to spend it will look like someone is attempting to spend a transaction that was never made in the first place.

Spending subsequent transactions to the address the genesis transaction was made to is possible because those transactions are normal transactions that every bitcoin client knows about."

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=119530.5;wap2


"but since no one has the private key for it" That statement cannot be proven and must therefore be considered false. Satoshi could prove exactly whom they are by producing that key, considering all the other stuff taken into account you think it would have just been discarded with no consideration of potential future use for it?

Just need the first 100 blocks to be treated like block 0.

From my understanding the first 50 BTC produced in the genesis block are not spendable. However the other UTxO sent to the same address are spendable. I believe that is where you may be getting confused.

Thank you Mystic Peg, I will keep that in mind. 

LOL you never mention BTC to anyone? I think you just discredited yourself as a probable liar. You feel the promotion that BT has brought to the BTC community the past few months through sponsorship has zero value? Please explain your view on this as I draw a blank when trying to understand your position on it.

You do not have to change their value, just make those blocks unspendable, much like the BTC genesis block is. Seems painfully obvious the "no pre-mine" is a lie and dev seems to be dragging heals over sorting out the issue. We can assume nothing dev. Those coins are out there somewhere. VC will die if you do not resolve it so the pre-mine will be worthless anyway.

More than 1/1,000,000 pick up a murder weapon at a scene without thinking especially if it was by a loved ones body. Yea blood gets everywhere. Rather crappy example you found there. I think a safe bet is never invest more than your IQ, or a comfortable factor there of.

Furthermore Shaky, I assume you promote BTC? So when a vastly superior alternative takes over and there are loads of BTC bag holders left making it look like the largest ponzi in history, you will be feeling bad? Or from today you'd rather no longer promote BTC?

All are innocent until proven guilty. Do your own due diligence and never invest more than you would be happy burning.

I read it before and thought your brother sounded like an idiot then in all honesty. Maybe he should look at it as an education, after all they cost money too.

From the bitterness you display I can only assume more was "invested" than could afford to be lost, if not then with all due respect so what. And if so, erm don't invest more than you can afford to lose. Pretty simple game tbh.

He invested $10 with Madoff?

A current 13%+ potential pre-mine lowering the price? Surely not.

I am still here, however the first 100 blocks need to be made unspendable.