Like I said before, am a big supporter of Usyk and I love everything he represents, his style of fighting and what he has accomplished so far in this industry. But what am just saying is that Parker shouldn't be written off until he gets the opportunity to show us what he got. I remember when Anthony Joshua was so hot and he was winning almost everything that came his way. When the chance of him fighting Usyk came, lots of people wrote off Usyk, he was considered underdog but at the end of the day, Usyk defeated him and since then he has been conquering everyone from then till this day. What if something like this happens with parker? Or don't you think that Usyk will lose a fight some day? As long as it is a competitive match I won't write anyone off, they both have the chances of winning, and if this fight is to happen, and with what Parker is doing, I will stay neutral.

Of course if you can spend that amount of money in getting Florian Wirtz and Ekitike, you should be ready to spend much more higher when you are going to price away one of premier league most prolific strikers. Newcastle are really holding out not to sell him, but it's really a big temptation for them. With that amount of money I think they will be force to sell. Liverpool shouldn't have gone for Ekitike as I don't see the possibility of them spending such an amount on Ekitike and still spend that much in signing Isak. They should have focused all their energy and resources in getting Isak. But if Liverpool gets Isak in addition to Ekitike, they will be unstoppable next season.

We can't be too sure about this till the fight happens only then can we find out if Joseph parker can beat Usyk or not. Am a big supporter of Usyk, but I also understand that Usyk cannot be champion forever. At some point he's going to lose unless he retire before then. Joseph parker has been winning his recent matches same as Usyk so you can't completely write off Parker. Parker is also showing some similarities that Usyk was showing back then when he was rising to stardom. Usyk Vs Parker would have been more interesting than what we saw against Dubios.

As long as there is still a chance that you are capable of losing that bet we can still call it gambling. The event is not 100% certified that you will win it, so even at 99.9%  chances that you are doing to win it is still gambling. I don't know about other sports, but in football, there many times that football matches that your analysis might have shown you that a certain club will win, but at the end of the day the match won't end as expected. The team that nobody thought could win ends up winning.

Rank- Hero Member
Segwit BTC address:bc1qfzt6jvjywxtnw39arkyllkztxhlw7tszjae7vl

Is not as if they are just going to pick the titles now that Viktor Gyökeres has joined their team. The possibilities of other challenges coming up in their team is still very high, because as they are recruiting, other teams are also recruiting very actively. Look at a team like Liverpool who has smashed lots of money on players. Look at Manchester city, Chelsea these clubs are recruiting actively. So Arsenal fans should have it in mind that Viktor Gyökeres has only come to do the role of a striker. The team has to play well in all areas to stand a chance of winning titles. Viktor Gyökeres alone won't give them the trophy they are desperately looking for. So this is the time for them to get whoever they know can help them. Be it in defence, midfield or goalkeeper.

So in essence what you are trying to say is that people are mostly talking about the negatives of gambling so they will discourage other people from coming into gambling? To me that doesn't really make any sense because you ain't really forcing anyone to gamble. Everyone who's into gambling today is doing it on their own will. That's why gambling is only available to adults, people who can make decisions on their own. Okay since the bad publicities about gambling has been going on over the ages, has it made gambling to reduce? New casinos and betting shops keeps coming up yearly. So wether we say bad or good about gambling, people keep coming into gambling.

Nobody is encouraging anyone to join gambling. I still repeat people join gambling out of their own free will. Besides almost everything we do in this life involves risks. But why is it that people makes it look like it's only in gambling that risks exists. We glorify the risks in gambling as if we don't have a choice to make in it. The casino's won't dip their hands in your account and take money from you. Whatever money we lost to the casino's is entirely our choice. If you can't lose big money, then don't gamble with big money. It's very simple. People lose big money because of their greed. And how is that individual greediness the fault of gambling or the casinos?

How many time has something like this happened with Fabrizio's news? If something happened once in 5 years or more, we can't question the integrity of the Man. So to me he's still accurate with his news. And in this case Viktor Gyökeres made it clear to Manchester United that wanted to snatch him in the late hour that he only wanted Arsenal and Fabrizio said it's a done deal, so you Arsenal fans should chill your Viktor Gyökeres is already in the bag for your club. There's no need for you guys to panic nobody is hijacking this deal at this stage.

The problem is from the coaches that they had over the years and their management. But in this case I will stress more on the coach. Why I said is the coach is that it's been same similar crop of players that Tottenham Hotspur has had over the past 5 years and nothing happened. But when Postcogulu came in, he let everyone know that he usually win something in his second year in his club. He built that mentality in his players and they delivered something in his second year. So if the previous coaches had set a standard that they wanted to win something, they would have won.  

I understand what you are saying, but there are also instances where players comes to the league and struggles to fit in. Some do fits in eventually but it does take time, while some fits in immediately. I said  because, if I was the one making the decision on who to buy between these guys, this's one major criteria I will look into in my decision making. Eberechi Eze is already living in London. He's fully settled there with his family. He has been a top performer for Crystal palace over the years. To me he's the one I will go for. That doesn't mean Xavi Simons is not a good option. He is, but on my own considerations Eze is best for me, and I want him to play for Arsenal.

If crystal palace will agree to sell Eberechi Eze to Arsenal, I will prefer him over Xavi Simons to join Arsenal, because of his premier league experience. Arsenal can't afford to have two of their new forwards players to be players that are entirely lacking premier league experience. It's will do them good since they have gotten Viktor Gyökeres that's going to play in the premier League for the first time, to add a player that has been in the league for years and Eberechi Eze fits that criteria and he's a goal scorer as well. So they should go for him over Xavi Simons

Arsenal didn't have any hand in that case as many believed they did. The investigation was ongoing and like every other accused persons, you are innocent until proven guilty by a court. Arsenal had a choice of suspending the player or allowing him to continue doing his job. Why will you suspend an innocent Man who hasn't been found guilty?

So for me Arsenal made the best decision by not suspending him. If they had and they player was eventually found innocent at the end of the day, he would have sued the club and it would have cost them millions of pounds. I believed they learned from what happened between Manchester city and Benjamin Mendy. Were Mendy was found not guilty by the court after City suspended him and weren't paying him wages. After the court case, he sued the club and won them in court and big money was paid to him as compensation.

How religious the country is will also determine their gambling habits. It doesn't matter how wealthy the people over there are or how vibrant their economy is, if the country has more religious population their gambling activities will be extremely low compared with countries that doesn't care much about religion. So this should also be put into consideration when deciding why some countries gambles more than others.

If I was in Marcus Rashford shoe I will do the same to revive my  dying career. Come on this dude has money already, but his career seems to be dying gradually, for a player who should be at the peak of his career at his current age. We all know that Marcus Rashford has a special talent and once he is in an environment where football and winning are taken serious, he will reinvent himself. And once he is reinvented and get back to his form that we all knew Rashford to be, his wage will definitely increase, if Barcelona decide to sign him from next season. Take a pay cut for just one season and revive your career is the ultimate sacrifice that a player has to do. Am really proud of Rashford for taking this decision.

Reapplying

Bitcointalk Profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3581354
Current amount of Posts: 2730
EARNED merit in the last 120 days: 53
Bech32 BTC address:
bc1qfzt6jvjywxtnw39arkyllkztxhlw7tszjae7vl

Most of the big transfers that happens in the market, the full payments don't happen at once. Some are  spread for reasonable number of years. Some take like 2 to 5 years to finish the payments. But it seems Galatasary will finish the payment next year, as they have paid more than half of the money. Which is one reason why I think Napoli were being more interested in selling to the Saudi club as they werr willing to make outright payment without owing except add on which would have come from performances. I don't have any concern about Osimhen, as am sure he will repay Galatasary of this money with his performances on the pitch. It's a good signing for them.

Let's not forget that Rashford can also play as No 9 sometimes. Besides there are many games to play and Raphinha can't play all the time let's be realistic with ourselves. And also to avoid overdependence in one particular player, Barcelona had to bring Rashford in. We have to be applauding Barcelona for have two good players in one position. How many clubs in the world can of having two quality players in LW? The world cup is coming up next summer and every player wants to be fit and available. If Raphinha plays all their games next season, he risk having long term injury.